Femtocell versus WiFi - A survey and comparison of architecture and performance

Syed Faraz Hasan, NH Siddique, Shyam Chakraborty

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Femtocells use common cellular air access technologies, but claim to improve system capacity according to Shannon's law by reducing distance between transmitter and receiver and thus improving the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Femtocells, however, use the IP network as backhaul architecture instead of the conventional cellular network infrastructure. Thus, femtocell and WiFi infrastructure networks have a lot in common. This raises a curiosity whether femtocell technology would replace existing WiFi technology. This can be answered only by carefully analyzing the similarities and differences between the two technologies. This paper provides a technical comparison between femtocells and WiFi in terms of architecture, operation and standards.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationUnknown Host Publication
Place of PublicationAalborg, Denmark
Pages916-920
Number of pages5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 May 2009
Event1st International Conference on Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace & Electronic Systems Technology - Aalborg, Denmark
Duration: 17 May 2009 → …

Conference

Conference1st International Conference on Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace & Electronic Systems Technology
Period17/05/09 → …

Fingerprint

Femtocell
Transmitters
Signal to noise ratio
Air

Cite this

Hasan, S. F., Siddique, NH., & Chakraborty, S. (2009). Femtocell versus WiFi - A survey and comparison of architecture and performance. In Unknown Host Publication (pp. 916-920). Aalborg, Denmark. https://doi.org/10.1109/WIRELESSVITAE.2009.5172572
Hasan, Syed Faraz ; Siddique, NH ; Chakraborty, Shyam. / Femtocell versus WiFi - A survey and comparison of architecture and performance. Unknown Host Publication. Aalborg, Denmark, 2009. pp. 916-920
@inproceedings{d5e8d263f9a645ca93a4c27477910aa0,
title = "Femtocell versus WiFi - A survey and comparison of architecture and performance",
abstract = "Femtocells use common cellular air access technologies, but claim to improve system capacity according to Shannon's law by reducing distance between transmitter and receiver and thus improving the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Femtocells, however, use the IP network as backhaul architecture instead of the conventional cellular network infrastructure. Thus, femtocell and WiFi infrastructure networks have a lot in common. This raises a curiosity whether femtocell technology would replace existing WiFi technology. This can be answered only by carefully analyzing the similarities and differences between the two technologies. This paper provides a technical comparison between femtocells and WiFi in terms of architecture, operation and standards.",
author = "Hasan, {Syed Faraz} and NH Siddique and Shyam Chakraborty",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1109/WIRELESSVITAE.2009.5172572",
language = "English",
pages = "916--920",
booktitle = "Unknown Host Publication",

}

Hasan, SF, Siddique, NH & Chakraborty, S 2009, Femtocell versus WiFi - A survey and comparison of architecture and performance. in Unknown Host Publication. Aalborg, Denmark, pp. 916-920, 1st International Conference on Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace & Electronic Systems Technology, 17/05/09. https://doi.org/10.1109/WIRELESSVITAE.2009.5172572

Femtocell versus WiFi - A survey and comparison of architecture and performance. / Hasan, Syed Faraz; Siddique, NH; Chakraborty, Shyam.

Unknown Host Publication. Aalborg, Denmark, 2009. p. 916-920.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Femtocell versus WiFi - A survey and comparison of architecture and performance

AU - Hasan, Syed Faraz

AU - Siddique, NH

AU - Chakraborty, Shyam

PY - 2009/5/17

Y1 - 2009/5/17

N2 - Femtocells use common cellular air access technologies, but claim to improve system capacity according to Shannon's law by reducing distance between transmitter and receiver and thus improving the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Femtocells, however, use the IP network as backhaul architecture instead of the conventional cellular network infrastructure. Thus, femtocell and WiFi infrastructure networks have a lot in common. This raises a curiosity whether femtocell technology would replace existing WiFi technology. This can be answered only by carefully analyzing the similarities and differences between the two technologies. This paper provides a technical comparison between femtocells and WiFi in terms of architecture, operation and standards.

AB - Femtocells use common cellular air access technologies, but claim to improve system capacity according to Shannon's law by reducing distance between transmitter and receiver and thus improving the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Femtocells, however, use the IP network as backhaul architecture instead of the conventional cellular network infrastructure. Thus, femtocell and WiFi infrastructure networks have a lot in common. This raises a curiosity whether femtocell technology would replace existing WiFi technology. This can be answered only by carefully analyzing the similarities and differences between the two technologies. This paper provides a technical comparison between femtocells and WiFi in terms of architecture, operation and standards.

U2 - 10.1109/WIRELESSVITAE.2009.5172572

DO - 10.1109/WIRELESSVITAE.2009.5172572

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 916

EP - 920

BT - Unknown Host Publication

CY - Aalborg, Denmark

ER -