Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Family‐Led Decision‐Making Meetings as an Alternative to Initial Child Protection Conferences: Findings From a Realist Evaluation of the Safeguarding Family Group Conferencing Pilot in England

  • Bekkah Bernheim
  • , Jennie Hayes
  • , Alankrita Singh
  • , Katrina Wyatt
  • , Donald Forrester
  • , Lorna Stabler

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Safeguarding Family Group Conferencing (FGC) is a family‐led decision‐making process offered to some families in England as an alternative to an Initial Child Protection Conference when Children's Services have safeguarding concerns. A realist evaluation was conducted within three local authorities piloting this approach to build understanding around how Safeguarding FGC works in relation to desired outcomes. Qualitative data including semi‐structured interviews ( n = 27) with families and professionals, meeting observations and researchers' reflective notes were generated and used to develop, test and refine a programme theory about how the intervention works. In this paper, we highlight two key generative causal mechanisms, which help explain how Safeguarding FGC works—information sharing between families and professionals and the capacity of the family's network. The programme theory could help policy‐makers and practitioners interested in adopting family‐led approaches to child protection social work like Safeguarding FGC in England and further afield by articulating clearly the ways in which the intervention could lead to important outcomes for families.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2315-2326
Number of pages12
JournalChild and Family Social Work
Volume31
Issue number4
Early online date3 Feb 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished online - 3 Feb 2026

Bibliographical note

© 2026 The Author(s). Child & Family Social Work published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Data Availability Statement

Due to the sensitive nature of the data collected, the small sample size, and in keeping with ethics requirements, data were not made publicly available.

Funding

This study was supported by the NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research Programme (Grant reference Number NIHR131922). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. This study received the support of the Clinical Research Network South West Peninsula (CPMS54314). The Children's Social Care Research and Development Centre (CASCADE) receives infrastructure funding from the Health and Care Research Wales.

FundersFunder number
NIHRNIHR131922

    Keywords

    • child and family social work
    • child protection
    • family group conference
    • programme theory
    • realist evaluation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Family‐Led Decision‐Making Meetings as an Alternative to Initial Child Protection Conferences: Findings From a Realist Evaluation of the Safeguarding Family Group Conferencing Pilot in England'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this