Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Factors predicting myopia incidence in China and Europe

  • Nina Tahhan
  • , Xiangui He
  • , Kathryn Saunders
  • , Pelsin Demir
  • , Rebecca Leighton
  • , Sara McCullough
  • , Karthikeyan Baskaran
  • , Antonio Filipe Macedo
  • , Xun Xu
  • , Padmaja Sankaridurg
  • , Thomas Naduvilath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aims: To develop a predictive model for myopia incidence using population-based data from Chinese and European children. Methods: Analysis of four longitudinal studies from the UK, Sweden and China was conducted. Data from 4405 non-myopic children aged 6 to 16.8 years with spherical equivalent (SE) refraction from −0.49 D to +10.00 D were analysed. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the probability of myopia incidence by 12 and 24 months based on age, sex, parental myopia, cycloplegic SE, axial length and axial length/corneal radius of curvature (AL/CR). Hyperopic reserve was defined as the minimum level of hyperopia required to provide <10% probability of developing myopia by 24 months. Results: The cumulative incidence of myopia by the 24th month was 18.8% for Chinese and 6.7% for European (p < 0.001) populations. Based on multivariate Cox regression, a greater risk of myopia incidence was seen in Chinese children, younger ages, females, children with parental myopia, less hyperopic SE and higher AL/CR. SE had the highest predictive accuracy (C statistic 0.90). The AL/CR ratio had a greater predictive accuracy (C statistic 0.75) than axial length alone (C statistic 0.63). Predictive accuracy of all variables was similar between ethnicities (p > 0.50) apart from axial length, which was higher in Chinese children (C statistic 0.65) versus European children (C statistic 0.55, p = 0.04). To avert the risk of myopia, Chinese eyes required a greater hyperopic reserve ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 D compared to European eyes ranging from 0 to 0.5 D, depending on age and other predictive factors. Conclusions: SE is the strongest predictive factor for both ethnicities. The influence of predictive factors is similar between ethnicities/regions though Chinese children have a greater risk of developing myopia and require a higher hyperopic reserve. These data could be useful for developing a predictive tool of myopia incidence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1867-1881
Number of pages15
JournalOphthalmic and Physiological Optics
Volume45
Issue number7
Early online date31 Jul 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 30 Nov 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China, Grant/Award Number: 2021YFC2702100, 2021YFC2702104 and 2019YFC0840607; Shanghai Municipal Hospital Development Center, Grant/Award Number: SHDC2022CRD015; The College of Optometrists; Department for the Economy-Northern Ireland; Ulster University; Specssavers Sweden AB; Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University Kalmar; Shanghai Science and Technology Commission, Grant/Award Number: 21S31900800; Brien Holden Vision Institute.

FundersFunder number
University of New South Wales
SHDC2022CRD015
2019YFC0840607, 2021YFC2702104, 2021YFC2702100
21S31900800

    Keywords

    • myopia
    • incidence
    • risk factors
    • children
    • predictive
    • Humans
    • Risk Factors
    • Proportional Hazards Models
    • Myopia/epidemiology
    • Male
    • Incidence
    • Europe/epidemiology
    • Adolescent
    • Female
    • Refraction, Ocular/physiology
    • Child
    • China/epidemiology
    • Sweden/epidemiology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Factors predicting myopia incidence in China and Europe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this