Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Factors associated with screening positive for immediate or sustained distress from a longitudinal study of older victims of community crime

  • Marc Serfaty
  • , Victoria Vickerstaff
  • , Teresa Lee
  • , Monica Panca
  • , Gloria Laycock
  • , Chris R Brewin
  • , Marta Buszewicz
  • , Gerard Leavey
  • , Vari M Drennan
  • , Jonathan Cooke
  • , Anthony Kessel
  • , Jessica Satchell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background The psychological impact of community crime on older people was significant, but there is a dearth of data assessing victims’ risk of sustained distress to inform practice. Aim To determine factors associated with initial distress and sustained depressive and/or anxiety symptoms following a community crime in older victims. Method In 12 UK urban areas, police screened older crime victims for distress within two months of a reported crime using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 and Generalised Anxiety Disorder-2 scales and then rescreened those initially distressed at three months. Logistic regression identified associated factors, and screening costs were estimated. Results Of the thirty one percent (2,915/9,391) of victims screened, 40% (1,171/2,915) were positive on at least one measure; 61% (717/1,171) were rescreened and 50.4% (361/717) remained significantly distressed at three months. Sustained symptoms were associated with being female (Odds Ratio (OR)=0.58 95% Confidence interval (CI):0.40, 0.86. P = 0.007), having previous anxiety or depression (OR = 1.75, 95% CI:1.12, 2.57. P = 0.004), their daily lives been affected (OR = 3.99, 95% CI:2.60, 6.13. P < 0.001) and a change in sense of safety since crime (very much more unsafe OR = 15.39, 95% CI:4.16, 56.95. P < 0.001). Sustained distress was decreased with home ownership (owner/occupier OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.69; private rented OR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.67 vs council rented. P = 0.004). Factors associated with initial distress were also identified. Conclusions Crime-related distress was common and linked to sociodemographic factors and prior mental health issues; structured face-to-face assessments offered a quick, low-cost way to identify those at risk.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages33
JournalResearch Connections
Volume1
Issue number2
Early online date24 Apr 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 30 Apr 2026

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press.

Data Availability Statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. We are cautious about any information which may lead to identification of participants. For this reason, any raw data sharing outside of the publication will only be for the purpose of a serious research proposal and the request must be in writing and sent to [email protected] where it will be considered. Data will be available for up to 10 years from publication.

Funding

The data used was generated by the funded NIHR-PHR Victim Improvement Package Trial (grant number 13/164/32). JS and MS are also supported by the NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre at University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University College London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The funders had no other role other than financial support.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • older people
  • Screening
  • cost estimation
  • community crime
  • depression
  • anxiety

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Factors associated with screening positive for immediate or sustained distress from a longitudinal study of older victims of community crime'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this