Factors associated with employment outcomes in cancer survivors: a systematic scoping review spanning a decade of international research

Emma Kemp, Anna Ugalde, Skye Marshall, Lisa Grech, Imogen Ramsey, Deborah Kirk, Georgia Halkett, Cherith Semple, Cristiane Bergerot, Yu Ke, Hannah Jongebloed, Nicolas H Hart, Darren Haywood, Ian Olver, Carolyn Taylor, Sue Woodall, Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy, Larissa Nekhlyudov, Suvam Banerjee, Wendy W T LamJuhee Cho, Bogda Koczwara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Employment for cancer survivors impacts psychological, physical, and financial wellbeing. Existing systematic reviews of factors associated with employment outcomes are limited to specific cancer types, determinants, outcomes, and/or settings. This scoping review spanning one decade of international research aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of factors associated with employment outcomes in cancer survivors. Methods: Systematic scoping review methodology was used to identify primary studies conducting multivariate analysis of factors associated with any employment outcome (negative: reduced or less timely, productive, sustained, or satisfying employment or positive: maintained/return or more timely, productive, sustained, or satisfying employment) in adult cancer survivors (January 2014 to March 2024). Data were extracted on population, setting, outcomes, and associated factors. Results: Across 185 included studies, factors frequently associated with negative employment outcomes included older age, female sex, advanced cancer stage, some cancer types, and receipt of chemotherapy. Factors frequently associated with positive employment outcomes included higher education, more advantaged insurance status, some cancer types, and higher physical function. Research gaps were identified in specific populations/settings at risk of poorer outcomes. Conclusions: Modifiable and nonmodifiable factors associated with employment outcomes require screening and targeted interventions in clinical settings as well as the development of healthcare delivery, workplace, and national policies and resources. Future research should address gaps in people with advanced cancer, vulnerable groups, and lower resource settings. Implications for cancer survivors: Survivors at risk for negative outcomes should be identified and offered relevant, tailored information and resources regarding the impact of cancer and treatment on employment outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number994
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
Volume33
Issue number11
Early online date30 Oct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 30 Oct 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2025.

Data Access Statement

Data is provided within the manuscript or supplementary information files.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript. NHH receives support from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Investigator Fellowship (APP2017080).

FundersFunder number
National Health and Medical Research CouncilAPP2017080

    Keywords

    • Sex Factors
    • Male
    • Age Factors
    • Humans
    • Female
    • Neoplasms - psychology
    • Adult
    • International research
    • Cancer Survivors - statistics & numerical data - psychology
    • Employment - statistics & numerical data
    • Employment outcomes
    • Cancer survivors
    • Modifiable and nonmodifiable factors
    • Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data
    • Employment/statistics & numerical data
    • Neoplasms/psychology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Factors associated with employment outcomes in cancer survivors: a systematic scoping review spanning a decade of international research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this