Abstract
Most of the traditional technology acceptance models revolve around information systems (IS)/information technology (IT) adoption at individual user level. Organizations are complex social systems in which stakeholders interact and play different roles in IS/IT adoption and use. This study provides an organizational perspective through multiple stakeholder viewpoints to explore ‘systemic problems’ in IS adoption. This paper contributes to IS literature by applying boundary critique mechanism of Critical Systems Heuristics (CSH) through an interpretive study of a web portal implementation project in a West Australian University. This perspective considers systemic problems as a ‘system of conflicts’ comprising key factors and organization-wide stakeholder interactions. Moreover, it adds to CSH theory as to how systemic problems are
identified by using boundary judgments and evaluated using a hermeneutic approach.
identified by using boundary judgments and evaluated using a hermeneutic approach.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 125 |
| Number of pages | 153 |
| Journal | Systemic Practice and Action Research |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published online - 13 Sept 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Keywords
- Information systems/information technology adoption
- Boundary critique
- Critical Systems Heuristics
- Systemic problems
- Systems Thinking
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring Systemic Problems in IS Adoption Using Critical Systems Heuristics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver