Exploring organizational support for the provision of structured self-management education for people with Type 2 diabetes: findings from a qualitative study

Marian Carey, Shona Agarwal, Rosie Horne, Mark Davies, Mary Slevin, Vivien Coates

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aim: To explore the organizational context in which Type 2 diabetes structured group education is provided. Methods: Four Clinical Commissioning Groups in England providing Type 2 diabetes structured self-management education participated in a qualitative study exploring the context for provision of that education. Using UK National Diabetes Audit returns, two Clinical Commissioning Groups were selected that had non-attendance rates of ≤25%, and two that had non-attendance rates of ≥50%. Between May 2016 and August 2017, 20 interviews were conducted with Clinical Commissioning Group staff including: commissioners, healthcare professionals, managers, general practitioners and diabetes educators. Data gathering was prolonged as it proved challenging to engage with healthcare staff as a result of frequent local restructuring and service disruption. Results: Local audits revealed discrepancies in basic data such as referral and attendance numbers compared with national audit data. There was a commonality in the themes identified from interviews: diabetes education was rarely embedded in service structure; where education uptake was poor, a lack of central support to delivery teams was noticeable; and where education uptake was positive, delivery teams were actively engaged, sometimes relying on enthusiastic individuals. Both situations put the local sustainability of diabetes education at risk. Conclusions: There appears to be a link between attendance rates and organizational issues, therefore, when considering how to increase attendance rates, the state of the diabetes education infrastructure should be reviewed. Good uptake of diabetes education can be too reliant on the enthusiastic commitment of small teams or individuals delivering the education.

LanguageEnglish
Pages761-770
Number of pages10
JournalDiabetic medicine
Volume36
Issue number6
Early online date13 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Self Care
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Education
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care
England
General Practitioners
Referral and Consultation

Keywords

  • Type 2 diabetes
  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Structured diabetes education
  • DSME
  • Primary Health Care
  • Health Organisations
  • Self-Management
  • Qualitative Research

Cite this

@article{8d3cc4dc7a1f40c1bb1c51ea169d0f01,
title = "Exploring organizational support for the provision of structured self-management education for people with Type 2 diabetes: findings from a qualitative study",
abstract = "Aim: To explore the organizational context in which Type 2 diabetes structured group education is provided. Methods: Four Clinical Commissioning Groups in England providing Type 2 diabetes structured self-management education participated in a qualitative study exploring the context for provision of that education. Using UK National Diabetes Audit returns, two Clinical Commissioning Groups were selected that had non-attendance rates of ≤25{\%}, and two that had non-attendance rates of ≥50{\%}. Between May 2016 and August 2017, 20 interviews were conducted with Clinical Commissioning Group staff including: commissioners, healthcare professionals, managers, general practitioners and diabetes educators. Data gathering was prolonged as it proved challenging to engage with healthcare staff as a result of frequent local restructuring and service disruption. Results: Local audits revealed discrepancies in basic data such as referral and attendance numbers compared with national audit data. There was a commonality in the themes identified from interviews: diabetes education was rarely embedded in service structure; where education uptake was poor, a lack of central support to delivery teams was noticeable; and where education uptake was positive, delivery teams were actively engaged, sometimes relying on enthusiastic individuals. Both situations put the local sustainability of diabetes education at risk. Conclusions: There appears to be a link between attendance rates and organizational issues, therefore, when considering how to increase attendance rates, the state of the diabetes education infrastructure should be reviewed. Good uptake of diabetes education can be too reliant on the enthusiastic commitment of small teams or individuals delivering the education.",
keywords = "Type 2 diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Structured diabetes education, DSME, Primary Health Care, Health Organisations, Self-Management, Qualitative Research",
author = "Marian Carey and Shona Agarwal and Rosie Horne and Mark Davies and Mary Slevin and Vivien Coates",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/dme.13946",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "761--770",
journal = "Diabetes Medicine",
issn = "0742-3071",
number = "6",

}

Exploring organizational support for the provision of structured self-management education for people with Type 2 diabetes: findings from a qualitative study. / Carey, Marian; Agarwal, Shona ; Horne, Rosie; Davies, Mark; Slevin, Mary; Coates, Vivien.

In: Diabetic medicine, Vol. 36, No. 6, 01.06.2019, p. 761-770.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring organizational support for the provision of structured self-management education for people with Type 2 diabetes: findings from a qualitative study

AU - Carey, Marian

AU - Agarwal, Shona

AU - Horne, Rosie

AU - Davies, Mark

AU - Slevin, Mary

AU - Coates, Vivien

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Aim: To explore the organizational context in which Type 2 diabetes structured group education is provided. Methods: Four Clinical Commissioning Groups in England providing Type 2 diabetes structured self-management education participated in a qualitative study exploring the context for provision of that education. Using UK National Diabetes Audit returns, two Clinical Commissioning Groups were selected that had non-attendance rates of ≤25%, and two that had non-attendance rates of ≥50%. Between May 2016 and August 2017, 20 interviews were conducted with Clinical Commissioning Group staff including: commissioners, healthcare professionals, managers, general practitioners and diabetes educators. Data gathering was prolonged as it proved challenging to engage with healthcare staff as a result of frequent local restructuring and service disruption. Results: Local audits revealed discrepancies in basic data such as referral and attendance numbers compared with national audit data. There was a commonality in the themes identified from interviews: diabetes education was rarely embedded in service structure; where education uptake was poor, a lack of central support to delivery teams was noticeable; and where education uptake was positive, delivery teams were actively engaged, sometimes relying on enthusiastic individuals. Both situations put the local sustainability of diabetes education at risk. Conclusions: There appears to be a link between attendance rates and organizational issues, therefore, when considering how to increase attendance rates, the state of the diabetes education infrastructure should be reviewed. Good uptake of diabetes education can be too reliant on the enthusiastic commitment of small teams or individuals delivering the education.

AB - Aim: To explore the organizational context in which Type 2 diabetes structured group education is provided. Methods: Four Clinical Commissioning Groups in England providing Type 2 diabetes structured self-management education participated in a qualitative study exploring the context for provision of that education. Using UK National Diabetes Audit returns, two Clinical Commissioning Groups were selected that had non-attendance rates of ≤25%, and two that had non-attendance rates of ≥50%. Between May 2016 and August 2017, 20 interviews were conducted with Clinical Commissioning Group staff including: commissioners, healthcare professionals, managers, general practitioners and diabetes educators. Data gathering was prolonged as it proved challenging to engage with healthcare staff as a result of frequent local restructuring and service disruption. Results: Local audits revealed discrepancies in basic data such as referral and attendance numbers compared with national audit data. There was a commonality in the themes identified from interviews: diabetes education was rarely embedded in service structure; where education uptake was poor, a lack of central support to delivery teams was noticeable; and where education uptake was positive, delivery teams were actively engaged, sometimes relying on enthusiastic individuals. Both situations put the local sustainability of diabetes education at risk. Conclusions: There appears to be a link between attendance rates and organizational issues, therefore, when considering how to increase attendance rates, the state of the diabetes education infrastructure should be reviewed. Good uptake of diabetes education can be too reliant on the enthusiastic commitment of small teams or individuals delivering the education.

KW - Type 2 diabetes

KW - Diabetes Mellitus

KW - Structured diabetes education

KW - DSME

KW - Primary Health Care

KW - Health Organisations

KW - Self-Management

KW - Qualitative Research

U2 - 10.1111/dme.13946

DO - 10.1111/dme.13946

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 761

EP - 770

JO - Diabetes Medicine

T2 - Diabetes Medicine

JF - Diabetes Medicine

SN - 0742-3071

IS - 6

ER -