Abstract
Purpose
Social supermarkets (SSMs) are increasingly being used as a form of food aid. However, there is limited literature on how these models operate. The aim of this study is to investigate existing SSM models’ standard operating procedures and related barriers and facilitators.
Design/methodology/approach
Data were collected from nine SSMs in the form of interviews with SSM managers. Data were thematically analysed to identify key principles relating to SSM operations and deductively analysed to identify key barriers and facilitators.
Findings
There were variations regarding how these models were operated by different organisations, with differences including those relating to membership criteria, food sourcing and pricing. Although there were operational differences, some common key principles were identified, including the importance of wraparound provision, the need to diversify food sources and the need for flexibility on a case-by-case basis. Various barriers and facilitators were also identified.
Originality/value
There is currently limited research on SSM operating practices. This exploratory study addresses that gap, providing direct insight and advice from the managerial perspective related to developing and managing SSMs.
Social supermarkets (SSMs) are increasingly being used as a form of food aid. However, there is limited literature on how these models operate. The aim of this study is to investigate existing SSM models’ standard operating procedures and related barriers and facilitators.
Design/methodology/approach
Data were collected from nine SSMs in the form of interviews with SSM managers. Data were thematically analysed to identify key principles relating to SSM operations and deductively analysed to identify key barriers and facilitators.
Findings
There were variations regarding how these models were operated by different organisations, with differences including those relating to membership criteria, food sourcing and pricing. Although there were operational differences, some common key principles were identified, including the importance of wraparound provision, the need to diversify food sources and the need for flexibility on a case-by-case basis. Various barriers and facilitators were also identified.
Originality/value
There is currently limited research on SSM operating practices. This exploratory study addresses that gap, providing direct insight and advice from the managerial perspective related to developing and managing SSMs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 697-711 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | British Food Journal |
| Volume | 128 |
| Issue number | 13 |
| Early online date | 27 Jul 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published online - 27 Jul 2026 |
Bibliographical note
© 2026 Emma Beacom and Sinéad Furey.Funding
BAM-IAM Collaborative Research Award.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| British Academy | 2024-434 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Keywords
- Social supermarket
- Food poverty
- Food insecurity
- Food aid
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring key principles for development and management of social supermarkets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver