Exploring Barriers to Constructing Locally Based Peacebuilding Theory: The Case of Northern Ireland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article seeks to explore why, after significant financial investment and a history of nearly 50 years of civil society activity, there is a paucity of explicitly codified and consolidated indigenous theory that has emerged from peacebuilding practice in Northern Ireland. Methodologically, this apparent contradiction is explored, utilizing both empirical research (interviews with key peacebuilders) and the wide practitioner experience of the authors. It is argued that two complex dynamics have contributed to the subordination of local practice-based knowledge, namely, the professionalization of peace and the dominance of research over practice within academia. These two dynamics have played a mutually exacerbatory and significant role in creating barriers to constructing local peacebuilding theory. Phronesis, an Aristotelian term for practical knowledge, is explored to discover what insights it may contribute to both research, theory and practice in the field of peacebuilding, followed by examples of institutions demonstrating its value for practice–theory reflexivity. The article concludes with a call for peace research that validates and values practical knowledge. By doing so, the authors argue, new avenues for collaborative partnership between practitioners and academics can open up, which may play a constructive role in bridging practice–theory divides and, most importantly, contribute to building more effective and sustainable peacebuilding processes in Northern Ireland and in other conflict contexts.
LanguageEnglish
Pages33-52
JournalInternational Journal of Conflict Engagement and Resolution
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Aug 2015

Fingerprint

theory-practice
peace research
financial investment
professionalization
reflexivity
empirical research
Values
civil society
peace
history
interview
experience

Keywords

  • peacebuilding
  • phronesis
  • civil society
  • Northern Ireland
  • practice-theory

Cite this

@article{466d5494ea89450ab91b379ac46554e5,
title = "Exploring Barriers to Constructing Locally Based Peacebuilding Theory: The Case of Northern Ireland",
abstract = "This article seeks to explore why, after significant financial investment and a history of nearly 50 years of civil society activity, there is a paucity of explicitly codified and consolidated indigenous theory that has emerged from peacebuilding practice in Northern Ireland. Methodologically, this apparent contradiction is explored, utilizing both empirical research (interviews with key peacebuilders) and the wide practitioner experience of the authors. It is argued that two complex dynamics have contributed to the subordination of local practice-based knowledge, namely, the professionalization of peace and the dominance of research over practice within academia. These two dynamics have played a mutually exacerbatory and significant role in creating barriers to constructing local peacebuilding theory. Phronesis, an Aristotelian term for practical knowledge, is explored to discover what insights it may contribute to both research, theory and practice in the field of peacebuilding, followed by examples of institutions demonstrating its value for practice–theory reflexivity. The article concludes with a call for peace research that validates and values practical knowledge. By doing so, the authors argue, new avenues for collaborative partnership between practitioners and academics can open up, which may play a constructive role in bridging practice–theory divides and, most importantly, contribute to building more effective and sustainable peacebuilding processes in Northern Ireland and in other conflict contexts.",
keywords = "peacebuilding, phronesis, civil society, Northern Ireland, practice-theory",
author = "Grainne Kelly and Emily Stanton",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "27",
doi = "10.5553/IJCER/221199652015003001002",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "33--52",
number = "3",

}

Exploring Barriers to Constructing Locally Based Peacebuilding Theory: The Case of Northern Ireland. / Kelly, Grainne; Stanton, Emily.

Vol. 1, No. 3, 27.08.2015, p. 33-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring Barriers to Constructing Locally Based Peacebuilding Theory: The Case of Northern Ireland

AU - Kelly, Grainne

AU - Stanton, Emily

PY - 2015/8/27

Y1 - 2015/8/27

N2 - This article seeks to explore why, after significant financial investment and a history of nearly 50 years of civil society activity, there is a paucity of explicitly codified and consolidated indigenous theory that has emerged from peacebuilding practice in Northern Ireland. Methodologically, this apparent contradiction is explored, utilizing both empirical research (interviews with key peacebuilders) and the wide practitioner experience of the authors. It is argued that two complex dynamics have contributed to the subordination of local practice-based knowledge, namely, the professionalization of peace and the dominance of research over practice within academia. These two dynamics have played a mutually exacerbatory and significant role in creating barriers to constructing local peacebuilding theory. Phronesis, an Aristotelian term for practical knowledge, is explored to discover what insights it may contribute to both research, theory and practice in the field of peacebuilding, followed by examples of institutions demonstrating its value for practice–theory reflexivity. The article concludes with a call for peace research that validates and values practical knowledge. By doing so, the authors argue, new avenues for collaborative partnership between practitioners and academics can open up, which may play a constructive role in bridging practice–theory divides and, most importantly, contribute to building more effective and sustainable peacebuilding processes in Northern Ireland and in other conflict contexts.

AB - This article seeks to explore why, after significant financial investment and a history of nearly 50 years of civil society activity, there is a paucity of explicitly codified and consolidated indigenous theory that has emerged from peacebuilding practice in Northern Ireland. Methodologically, this apparent contradiction is explored, utilizing both empirical research (interviews with key peacebuilders) and the wide practitioner experience of the authors. It is argued that two complex dynamics have contributed to the subordination of local practice-based knowledge, namely, the professionalization of peace and the dominance of research over practice within academia. These two dynamics have played a mutually exacerbatory and significant role in creating barriers to constructing local peacebuilding theory. Phronesis, an Aristotelian term for practical knowledge, is explored to discover what insights it may contribute to both research, theory and practice in the field of peacebuilding, followed by examples of institutions demonstrating its value for practice–theory reflexivity. The article concludes with a call for peace research that validates and values practical knowledge. By doing so, the authors argue, new avenues for collaborative partnership between practitioners and academics can open up, which may play a constructive role in bridging practice–theory divides and, most importantly, contribute to building more effective and sustainable peacebuilding processes in Northern Ireland and in other conflict contexts.

KW - peacebuilding

KW - phronesis

KW - civil society

KW - Northern Ireland

KW - practice-theory

U2 - 10.5553/IJCER/221199652015003001002

DO - 10.5553/IJCER/221199652015003001002

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 33

EP - 52

IS - 3

ER -