Experimental auction confirmation that social desirability bias does not predict willingness to pay for eco-labeled goods

Kieran Higgins, Alberto Longo, W.G. Hutchinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

It is often assumed that consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for eco-labeled products in research settings is not because of a desire for environmental protection, but rather that they are socially compelled to make decisions that reflects favorably on them, limiting the validity of findings. Using a second-price Vickrey experimental auction, this study found higher WTP for an eco-labeled product than a comparable good, but that social desirability bias, measured by the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale, was not a significant predictor of WTP. Instead, environmental consciousness, environmental knowledge, education, and available information were stronger predictors of WTP for eco-labeled goods.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalExperimental Results
Volume3
Issue number1
Early online date10 Dec 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished online - 10 Dec 2021

Keywords

  • eco-label
  • experimental auction
  • second-price Vickrey auction
  • social desirability bias
  • willingness to pay

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Experimental auction confirmation that social desirability bias does not predict willingness to pay for eco-labeled goods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this