Evaluating an holistic assessment tool for palliative care practice"

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To evaluate a holistic assessment tool for palliative care practice. This included identifying patients’ needsusing the holistic tool and exploring the usability, applicability and barriers and facilitators towards implementation in practice.Background. The delivery of effective holistic palliative care requires a careful assessment of the patients’ needs and circumstances.Whilst holistic assessment of palliative care needs is advocated, questions exist around the appropriateness of toolsto assist this process.Design. Mixed-method research design.Methods. Data collection involved an analysis of piloted holistic assessments undertaken using the tool (n = 132) and twofocus groups with healthcare professionals (n = 10).Results. The tool enabled health professionals to identify and gain an understanding of the needs of the patients, specificallyin relation to the physical healthcare needs. Differences, however, between the analysis of the tool documentation and focusgroup responses were identified in particular areas. For example, 59 (688%) respondents had discussed preferred prioritiesof care with the patient; however, focus group comments revealed participants had concerns around this. Similarly, whilstover half of responses (n = 50; 575%) had considered a prognostic clinical indicator for the patient as an action, focusgroup results indicated questions around healthcare professionals’ knowledge and perceived usefulness of such indicators.Positive aspects of the tool were that it was easy to understand and captured the needs of individuals. Negative aspects ofthe tool were that it was repetitive and the experience of assessors required consideration.Conclusion. The tool evaluation identified questions regarding holistic assessment in palliative care practice and the importanceof communication.Relevance to clinical practice. A holistic assessment tool can support patient assessment and identification of patients’ needsin the ‘real world’ of palliative care practice, but the ‘tool’ is merely an aid to assist professionals to discuss difficult andsensitive aspects of care.
LanguageEnglish
JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
Volumeearly
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Palliative Care
Delivery of Health Care
Needs Assessment
Focus Groups
Documentation
Patient Care
Research Design
Communication
Health

Cite this

@article{f36b884bb16c4126abae7605c8e2a881,
title = "Evaluating an holistic assessment tool for palliative care practice{"}",
abstract = "Aims and objectives. To evaluate a holistic assessment tool for palliative care practice. This included identifying patients’ needsusing the holistic tool and exploring the usability, applicability and barriers and facilitators towards implementation in practice.Background. The delivery of effective holistic palliative care requires a careful assessment of the patients’ needs and circumstances.Whilst holistic assessment of palliative care needs is advocated, questions exist around the appropriateness of toolsto assist this process.Design. Mixed-method research design.Methods. Data collection involved an analysis of piloted holistic assessments undertaken using the tool (n = 132) and twofocus groups with healthcare professionals (n = 10).Results. The tool enabled health professionals to identify and gain an understanding of the needs of the patients, specificallyin relation to the physical healthcare needs. Differences, however, between the analysis of the tool documentation and focusgroup responses were identified in particular areas. For example, 59 (688{\%}) respondents had discussed preferred prioritiesof care with the patient; however, focus group comments revealed participants had concerns around this. Similarly, whilstover half of responses (n = 50; 575{\%}) had considered a prognostic clinical indicator for the patient as an action, focusgroup results indicated questions around healthcare professionals’ knowledge and perceived usefulness of such indicators.Positive aspects of the tool were that it was easy to understand and captured the needs of individuals. Negative aspects ofthe tool were that it was repetitive and the experience of assessors required consideration.Conclusion. The tool evaluation identified questions regarding holistic assessment in palliative care practice and the importanceof communication.Relevance to clinical practice. A holistic assessment tool can support patient assessment and identification of patients’ needsin the ‘real world’ of palliative care practice, but the ‘tool’ is merely an aid to assist professionals to discuss difficult andsensitive aspects of care.",
author = "Sonja McIlfatrick and Felicity Hasson",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/jocn.12320",
language = "English",
volume = "early",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Nursing",
issn = "0962-1067",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating an holistic assessment tool for palliative care practice"

AU - McIlfatrick, Sonja

AU - Hasson, Felicity

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Aims and objectives. To evaluate a holistic assessment tool for palliative care practice. This included identifying patients’ needsusing the holistic tool and exploring the usability, applicability and barriers and facilitators towards implementation in practice.Background. The delivery of effective holistic palliative care requires a careful assessment of the patients’ needs and circumstances.Whilst holistic assessment of palliative care needs is advocated, questions exist around the appropriateness of toolsto assist this process.Design. Mixed-method research design.Methods. Data collection involved an analysis of piloted holistic assessments undertaken using the tool (n = 132) and twofocus groups with healthcare professionals (n = 10).Results. The tool enabled health professionals to identify and gain an understanding of the needs of the patients, specificallyin relation to the physical healthcare needs. Differences, however, between the analysis of the tool documentation and focusgroup responses were identified in particular areas. For example, 59 (688%) respondents had discussed preferred prioritiesof care with the patient; however, focus group comments revealed participants had concerns around this. Similarly, whilstover half of responses (n = 50; 575%) had considered a prognostic clinical indicator for the patient as an action, focusgroup results indicated questions around healthcare professionals’ knowledge and perceived usefulness of such indicators.Positive aspects of the tool were that it was easy to understand and captured the needs of individuals. Negative aspects ofthe tool were that it was repetitive and the experience of assessors required consideration.Conclusion. The tool evaluation identified questions regarding holistic assessment in palliative care practice and the importanceof communication.Relevance to clinical practice. A holistic assessment tool can support patient assessment and identification of patients’ needsin the ‘real world’ of palliative care practice, but the ‘tool’ is merely an aid to assist professionals to discuss difficult andsensitive aspects of care.

AB - Aims and objectives. To evaluate a holistic assessment tool for palliative care practice. This included identifying patients’ needsusing the holistic tool and exploring the usability, applicability and barriers and facilitators towards implementation in practice.Background. The delivery of effective holistic palliative care requires a careful assessment of the patients’ needs and circumstances.Whilst holistic assessment of palliative care needs is advocated, questions exist around the appropriateness of toolsto assist this process.Design. Mixed-method research design.Methods. Data collection involved an analysis of piloted holistic assessments undertaken using the tool (n = 132) and twofocus groups with healthcare professionals (n = 10).Results. The tool enabled health professionals to identify and gain an understanding of the needs of the patients, specificallyin relation to the physical healthcare needs. Differences, however, between the analysis of the tool documentation and focusgroup responses were identified in particular areas. For example, 59 (688%) respondents had discussed preferred prioritiesof care with the patient; however, focus group comments revealed participants had concerns around this. Similarly, whilstover half of responses (n = 50; 575%) had considered a prognostic clinical indicator for the patient as an action, focusgroup results indicated questions around healthcare professionals’ knowledge and perceived usefulness of such indicators.Positive aspects of the tool were that it was easy to understand and captured the needs of individuals. Negative aspects ofthe tool were that it was repetitive and the experience of assessors required consideration.Conclusion. The tool evaluation identified questions regarding holistic assessment in palliative care practice and the importanceof communication.Relevance to clinical practice. A holistic assessment tool can support patient assessment and identification of patients’ needsin the ‘real world’ of palliative care practice, but the ‘tool’ is merely an aid to assist professionals to discuss difficult andsensitive aspects of care.

U2 - 10.1111/jocn.12320

DO - 10.1111/jocn.12320

M3 - Article

VL - early

JO - Journal of Clinical Nursing

T2 - Journal of Clinical Nursing

JF - Journal of Clinical Nursing

SN - 0962-1067

ER -