Evaluating a common semi-mechanistic mathematical model of gene-regulatory networks

Mizeranschi Alexandru, Huiru Zheng, Paul Thompson, Werner Dubitzky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Modeling and simulation of gene-regulatory networks (GRNs) has become an important aspect of modern systems biology investigations into mechanisms underlying gene regulation. A key challenge in this area is the automated inference (reverse-engineering) of dynamic, mechanistic GRN models from gene expression time-course data. Common mathematical formalisms for representing such models capture two aspects simultaneously within a single parameter: (1) Whether or not a gene is regulated, and if so, the type of regulator (activator or repressor), and (2) the strength of influence of the regulator (if any) on the target or effector gene. To accommodate both roles, "generous" boundaries or limits for possible values of this parameter are commonly allowed in the reverse-engineering process. This approach has several important drawbacks. First, in the absence of good guidelines, there is no consensus on what limits are reasonable. Second, because the limits may vary greatly among different reverse-engineering experiments, the concrete values obtained for the models may differ considerably, and thus it is difficult to compare models. Third, if high values are chosen as limits, the search space of the model inference process becomes very large, adding unnecessary computational load to the already complex reverse-engineering process. In this study, we demonstrate that restricting the limits to the [−1, +1] interval is sufficient to represent the essential features of GRN systems and offers a reduction of the search space without loss of quality in the resulting models. To show this, we have carried out reverse-engineering studies on data generated from artificial and experimentally determined from real GRN systems.
LanguageEnglish
JournalBMC Systems Biology 2015
Volume9(Supp
Issue numberS2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2015

Fingerprint

Reverse engineering
Genes
Mathematical models
Gene expression
Concretes
Experiments

Keywords

  • Modeling and simulation
  • gene regulation

Cite this

@article{c9f1521580a24c78a4621ab172fba1e3,
title = "Evaluating a common semi-mechanistic mathematical model of gene-regulatory networks",
abstract = "Modeling and simulation of gene-regulatory networks (GRNs) has become an important aspect of modern systems biology investigations into mechanisms underlying gene regulation. A key challenge in this area is the automated inference (reverse-engineering) of dynamic, mechanistic GRN models from gene expression time-course data. Common mathematical formalisms for representing such models capture two aspects simultaneously within a single parameter: (1) Whether or not a gene is regulated, and if so, the type of regulator (activator or repressor), and (2) the strength of influence of the regulator (if any) on the target or effector gene. To accommodate both roles, {"}generous{"} boundaries or limits for possible values of this parameter are commonly allowed in the reverse-engineering process. This approach has several important drawbacks. First, in the absence of good guidelines, there is no consensus on what limits are reasonable. Second, because the limits may vary greatly among different reverse-engineering experiments, the concrete values obtained for the models may differ considerably, and thus it is difficult to compare models. Third, if high values are chosen as limits, the search space of the model inference process becomes very large, adding unnecessary computational load to the already complex reverse-engineering process. In this study, we demonstrate that restricting the limits to the [−1, +1] interval is sufficient to represent the essential features of GRN systems and offers a reduction of the search space without loss of quality in the resulting models. To show this, we have carried out reverse-engineering studies on data generated from artificial and experimentally determined from real GRN systems.",
keywords = "Modeling and simulation, gene regulation",
author = "Mizeranschi Alexandru and Huiru Zheng and Paul Thompson and Werner Dubitzky",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/1752-0509-9-S5-S2",
language = "English",
volume = "9(Supp",
journal = "BMC Systems Biology",
issn = "1752-0509",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "S2",

}

Evaluating a common semi-mechanistic mathematical model of gene-regulatory networks. / Alexandru, Mizeranschi; Zheng, Huiru; Thompson, Paul; Dubitzky, Werner.

In: BMC Systems Biology 2015, Vol. 9(Supp, No. S2, 01.09.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating a common semi-mechanistic mathematical model of gene-regulatory networks

AU - Alexandru, Mizeranschi

AU - Zheng, Huiru

AU - Thompson, Paul

AU - Dubitzky, Werner

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Modeling and simulation of gene-regulatory networks (GRNs) has become an important aspect of modern systems biology investigations into mechanisms underlying gene regulation. A key challenge in this area is the automated inference (reverse-engineering) of dynamic, mechanistic GRN models from gene expression time-course data. Common mathematical formalisms for representing such models capture two aspects simultaneously within a single parameter: (1) Whether or not a gene is regulated, and if so, the type of regulator (activator or repressor), and (2) the strength of influence of the regulator (if any) on the target or effector gene. To accommodate both roles, "generous" boundaries or limits for possible values of this parameter are commonly allowed in the reverse-engineering process. This approach has several important drawbacks. First, in the absence of good guidelines, there is no consensus on what limits are reasonable. Second, because the limits may vary greatly among different reverse-engineering experiments, the concrete values obtained for the models may differ considerably, and thus it is difficult to compare models. Third, if high values are chosen as limits, the search space of the model inference process becomes very large, adding unnecessary computational load to the already complex reverse-engineering process. In this study, we demonstrate that restricting the limits to the [−1, +1] interval is sufficient to represent the essential features of GRN systems and offers a reduction of the search space without loss of quality in the resulting models. To show this, we have carried out reverse-engineering studies on data generated from artificial and experimentally determined from real GRN systems.

AB - Modeling and simulation of gene-regulatory networks (GRNs) has become an important aspect of modern systems biology investigations into mechanisms underlying gene regulation. A key challenge in this area is the automated inference (reverse-engineering) of dynamic, mechanistic GRN models from gene expression time-course data. Common mathematical formalisms for representing such models capture two aspects simultaneously within a single parameter: (1) Whether or not a gene is regulated, and if so, the type of regulator (activator or repressor), and (2) the strength of influence of the regulator (if any) on the target or effector gene. To accommodate both roles, "generous" boundaries or limits for possible values of this parameter are commonly allowed in the reverse-engineering process. This approach has several important drawbacks. First, in the absence of good guidelines, there is no consensus on what limits are reasonable. Second, because the limits may vary greatly among different reverse-engineering experiments, the concrete values obtained for the models may differ considerably, and thus it is difficult to compare models. Third, if high values are chosen as limits, the search space of the model inference process becomes very large, adding unnecessary computational load to the already complex reverse-engineering process. In this study, we demonstrate that restricting the limits to the [−1, +1] interval is sufficient to represent the essential features of GRN systems and offers a reduction of the search space without loss of quality in the resulting models. To show this, we have carried out reverse-engineering studies on data generated from artificial and experimentally determined from real GRN systems.

KW - Modeling and simulation

KW - gene regulation

U2 - 10.1186/1752-0509-9-S5-S2

DO - 10.1186/1752-0509-9-S5-S2

M3 - Article

VL - 9(Supp

JO - BMC Systems Biology

T2 - BMC Systems Biology

JF - BMC Systems Biology

SN - 1752-0509

IS - S2

ER -