Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ethics and Regulation of Human Brain Organoid Research: Recommendations from the Asia Pacific Neuroethics Working Group

  • Shu Ishida
  • , Brett J. Kagan
  • , Masanori Kataoka
  • , Julian Koplin
  • , Sebastian Porsdam Mann
  • , Jonathan Lewis
  • , Heather Browning
  • , Alexandre Erler
  • , Faisal Feroz
  • , Tamami Fukushi
  • , Søren Holm
  • , Masatoshi Kokubo
  • , Stephen Latham
  • , Andrea Lavazza
  • , Ilhak Lee
  • , Tsung-Ling Lee
  • , David Lyreskog
  • , Jerry Menikoff
  • , Takuya Niikawa
  • , Naoya Nagaishi
  • Eisuke Nakazawa, Serene Ong, Koji Ota, Christopher Register, Walter Veit, Ji Hyun Yang, Shang Long Yeo, Tsutomu Sawai, Julian Savulescu, Brian D. Earp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

55 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Human brain organoids (HBOs) are three-dimensional structures derived from human stem cells that model aspects of brain development and function, offering potentially unprecedented opportunities for studying neurological disorders and for developing treatments. This consensus paper presents recommendations from the Asia Pacific Neuroethics Working Group, developed through interdisciplinary collaboration among scientists, bioethicists, philosophers, and legal scholars who convened in Singapore in November 2024. We provide a comprehensive analysis of the ethical, legal, and sociocultural dimensions of HBO research, addressing both current realities and future possibilities. The paper examines key ethical considerations, including the potential moral status of HBOs, particularly regarding sentience and consciousness, while identifying and dispelling common misconceptions and “ethical red herrings” arising from sensationalized portrayals. We analyze consent frameworks for cell donation, privacy concerns, dual-use risks, and questions of distributive justice. Legal challenges are explored, including the categorical ambiguity of HBOs within existing regulatory frameworks, intellectual property issues, and cross-border inconsistencies in standards. Sociocultural perspectives emphasize the importance of public understanding, cross-cultural engagement, and empirical research on diverse community attitudes toward HBO research. In our recommendations, we advocate for evidence-based ethical discussions, anticipatory frameworks addressing potential future developments, contextualized analysis comparing HBOs to related experimental models, robust informed consent processes, proportionate responses to consciousness concerns, development of adaptive regulatory frameworks, responsible science communication to manage public expectations, and sustained interdisciplinary collaboration. We emphasize a balanced approach that promotes scientific innovation while maintaining rigorous ethical oversight, recognizing HBOs’ significant potential for advancing neuroscience and medicine. This represents the first comprehensive ethical framework for HBO research from the Asia Pacific region, helping to establish foundational principles for responsible development of this rapidly advancing field.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-31
Number of pages31
JournalAsian Bioethics Review
Early online date29 Apr 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 29 Apr 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026.

Funding

BDE’s work is supported by NUSMed and ODPRT (NUHSRO/2024/035/Startup/04) for the project “Experimental Philosophical Bioethics and Relational Moral Psychology.” TS, MKataoka, and SI received funding from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [Grant Number JP24K00039 and JP24H00813], and were funded in whole or in part by the Uehiro Foundation on Ethics and Education [Grant Number UEHIRO2023-0130]. TF received funding from JSPS KAKENHI [Grant Number JP22K20228 and JP24K06393]. TS and TN received funding from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [Grant Number JP24wm0425021]. KO, EN, and TS received funding from the JST Research Institute of Science and Technology for Society (RISTEX) [Grant Number JPMJRS22J4]. EN and TS received funding from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED), Multidisciplinary Frontier Brain and Neuroscience Discoveries (Brain/MINDS 2.0) [Grant Number JP24wm0625012]. WV and HB received funding from Open Philanthropy. SH and JL received funding from the European Commission [Project No 101006012 HYBRIDA]. SPM’s research was supported by a Novo Nordisk Foundation Grant for a scientifically independent International Collaborative Bioscience Innovation & Law Programme (Inter-CeBIL programme—grant no. NNF23SA0087056).

FundersFunder number
JP24K06393, JP22K20228, UEHIRO2023-0130
NUHSRO/2024/035/Startup/04
Japan Society for the Promotion of ScienceJP24K00039, JP24H00813
JPMJRS22J4
JP24wm0625012
European Commission101006012 HYBRIDA
NNF23SA0087056
JP24wm0425021

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Human brain organoids
    • Neuroethics
    • Moral status
    • Regulation Consent
    • Science communication
    • Consent
    • Regulation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Ethics and Regulation of Human Brain Organoid Research: Recommendations from the Asia Pacific Neuroethics Working Group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this