Ethical and Legal Analyses of Policy Prohibiting Tobacco Smoking in Enclosed Public Spaces

Taiwo Oriola

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A spate of legislations prohibiting cigarette smoking in enclosed public spaces, mainly on grounds of public health protection, recently swept across cities around the world. This is in tandem with a raft of increasingly restrictive national laws that emerged on the back of the ratification of the WHO Framework for Tobacco Control by more than one 168 countries in 2005. The central debate on the increasingly restrictive tobacco laws revolves on the extent to which public health interests justification should ground political intervention in a private right as basic as tobacco smoking, which interestingly is often lumped in the food and beverage category. The pertinent legal and ethical questions therefore are the following: Is or should there be a general unrestricted right to tobacco smoking? If there were such a right, should public health or ethical considerations trump private right to smoke in enclosed public spaces? And if public health interests were so paramount, should they go farther and ground tobacco smoking proscription in all private and public spheres? Using ethical principles and rights-based arguments, the paper critically examines the legal and ethical ramifications of public health justification for tobacco smoking proscription in enclosed public spaces.
LanguageEnglish
Pages828-840
JournalJournal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Dec 2009

Fingerprint

Ethical Analysis
Public Health
Smoking
Tobacco
Food and Beverages
Legislation
Smoke
Haemophilus influenzae type b-polysaccharide vaccine-diphtheria toxoid conjugate

Keywords

  • Tobacco smoking discouragement policy
  • enclosed public spaces
  • public health protection
  • paternalism
  • the harm principle
  • utilitarianism
  • rights-based perspectives on tobacco smoking

Cite this

@article{cac82c7b1dbf4438b59d1924befedc00,
title = "Ethical and Legal Analyses of Policy Prohibiting Tobacco Smoking in Enclosed Public Spaces",
abstract = "A spate of legislations prohibiting cigarette smoking in enclosed public spaces, mainly on grounds of public health protection, recently swept across cities around the world. This is in tandem with a raft of increasingly restrictive national laws that emerged on the back of the ratification of the WHO Framework for Tobacco Control by more than one 168 countries in 2005. The central debate on the increasingly restrictive tobacco laws revolves on the extent to which public health interests justification should ground political intervention in a private right as basic as tobacco smoking, which interestingly is often lumped in the food and beverage category. The pertinent legal and ethical questions therefore are the following: Is or should there be a general unrestricted right to tobacco smoking? If there were such a right, should public health or ethical considerations trump private right to smoke in enclosed public spaces? And if public health interests were so paramount, should they go farther and ground tobacco smoking proscription in all private and public spheres? Using ethical principles and rights-based arguments, the paper critically examines the legal and ethical ramifications of public health justification for tobacco smoking proscription in enclosed public spaces.",
keywords = "Tobacco smoking discouragement policy, enclosed public spaces, public health protection, paternalism, the harm principle, utilitarianism, rights-based perspectives on tobacco smoking",
author = "Taiwo Oriola",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00454.x",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "828--840",
journal = "Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics",
issn = "1073-1105",
number = "4",

}

Ethical and Legal Analyses of Policy Prohibiting Tobacco Smoking in Enclosed Public Spaces. / Oriola, Taiwo.

In: Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Vol. 37, No. 4, 17.12.2009, p. 828-840.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical and Legal Analyses of Policy Prohibiting Tobacco Smoking in Enclosed Public Spaces

AU - Oriola, Taiwo

PY - 2009/12/17

Y1 - 2009/12/17

N2 - A spate of legislations prohibiting cigarette smoking in enclosed public spaces, mainly on grounds of public health protection, recently swept across cities around the world. This is in tandem with a raft of increasingly restrictive national laws that emerged on the back of the ratification of the WHO Framework for Tobacco Control by more than one 168 countries in 2005. The central debate on the increasingly restrictive tobacco laws revolves on the extent to which public health interests justification should ground political intervention in a private right as basic as tobacco smoking, which interestingly is often lumped in the food and beverage category. The pertinent legal and ethical questions therefore are the following: Is or should there be a general unrestricted right to tobacco smoking? If there were such a right, should public health or ethical considerations trump private right to smoke in enclosed public spaces? And if public health interests were so paramount, should they go farther and ground tobacco smoking proscription in all private and public spheres? Using ethical principles and rights-based arguments, the paper critically examines the legal and ethical ramifications of public health justification for tobacco smoking proscription in enclosed public spaces.

AB - A spate of legislations prohibiting cigarette smoking in enclosed public spaces, mainly on grounds of public health protection, recently swept across cities around the world. This is in tandem with a raft of increasingly restrictive national laws that emerged on the back of the ratification of the WHO Framework for Tobacco Control by more than one 168 countries in 2005. The central debate on the increasingly restrictive tobacco laws revolves on the extent to which public health interests justification should ground political intervention in a private right as basic as tobacco smoking, which interestingly is often lumped in the food and beverage category. The pertinent legal and ethical questions therefore are the following: Is or should there be a general unrestricted right to tobacco smoking? If there were such a right, should public health or ethical considerations trump private right to smoke in enclosed public spaces? And if public health interests were so paramount, should they go farther and ground tobacco smoking proscription in all private and public spheres? Using ethical principles and rights-based arguments, the paper critically examines the legal and ethical ramifications of public health justification for tobacco smoking proscription in enclosed public spaces.

KW - Tobacco smoking discouragement policy

KW - enclosed public spaces

KW - public health protection

KW - paternalism

KW - the harm principle

KW - utilitarianism

KW - rights-based perspectives on tobacco smoking

U2 - 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00454.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00454.x

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 828

EP - 840

JO - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics

T2 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics

JF - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics

SN - 1073-1105

IS - 4

ER -