Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: the plot thickens

JR Cutcliffe, Hugh McKenna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

124 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

qualitative research is increasingly recognized and valued and its unique place in nursing research is highlighted by many. Despite this, some nurse researchers continue to raise epistemological issues about the problems of objectivity and the validity of qualitative research findings. This paper explores the issues relating to the representativeness or credibility of qualitative research findings. It therefore critiques the existing distinct philosophical and methodological positions concerning the trustworthiness of qualitative research findings, which are described as follows: quantitative studies should be judged using the same criteria and terminology as quanitative studies; it is impossible, in a meaningful way, for any criteria to be used to judge qualitative studies; qualitative studies should be judged using criteria that are developed for and fit the qualitative paradigm; and the credibility of qualitative research findings could be established by testing out the emerging theory by means of conducting a deductive quantitative study. The authors conclude by providing some guidelines for establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings.
LanguageEnglish
Pages374-380
JournalJournal of Advanced Nursing
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1999

Fingerprint

credibility
qualitative research
trustworthiness
objectivity
technical language
nursing
nurse
paradigm

Cite this

Cutcliffe, JR ; McKenna, Hugh. / Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: the plot thickens. In: Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1999 ; Vol. 30, No. 2. pp. 374-380.
@article{95b91ce44ca34316b35b532d3a7fbd66,
title = "Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: the plot thickens",
abstract = "qualitative research is increasingly recognized and valued and its unique place in nursing research is highlighted by many. Despite this, some nurse researchers continue to raise epistemological issues about the problems of objectivity and the validity of qualitative research findings. This paper explores the issues relating to the representativeness or credibility of qualitative research findings. It therefore critiques the existing distinct philosophical and methodological positions concerning the trustworthiness of qualitative research findings, which are described as follows: quantitative studies should be judged using the same criteria and terminology as quanitative studies; it is impossible, in a meaningful way, for any criteria to be used to judge qualitative studies; qualitative studies should be judged using criteria that are developed for and fit the qualitative paradigm; and the credibility of qualitative research findings could be established by testing out the emerging theory by means of conducting a deductive quantitative study. The authors conclude by providing some guidelines for establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings.",
author = "JR Cutcliffe and Hugh McKenna",
year = "1999",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01090.x",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "374--380",
journal = "Journal of Advanced Nursing",
issn = "0309-2402",
number = "2",

}

Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: the plot thickens. / Cutcliffe, JR; McKenna, Hugh.

In: Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 30, No. 2, 08.1999, p. 374-380.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: the plot thickens

AU - Cutcliffe, JR

AU - McKenna, Hugh

PY - 1999/8

Y1 - 1999/8

N2 - qualitative research is increasingly recognized and valued and its unique place in nursing research is highlighted by many. Despite this, some nurse researchers continue to raise epistemological issues about the problems of objectivity and the validity of qualitative research findings. This paper explores the issues relating to the representativeness or credibility of qualitative research findings. It therefore critiques the existing distinct philosophical and methodological positions concerning the trustworthiness of qualitative research findings, which are described as follows: quantitative studies should be judged using the same criteria and terminology as quanitative studies; it is impossible, in a meaningful way, for any criteria to be used to judge qualitative studies; qualitative studies should be judged using criteria that are developed for and fit the qualitative paradigm; and the credibility of qualitative research findings could be established by testing out the emerging theory by means of conducting a deductive quantitative study. The authors conclude by providing some guidelines for establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings.

AB - qualitative research is increasingly recognized and valued and its unique place in nursing research is highlighted by many. Despite this, some nurse researchers continue to raise epistemological issues about the problems of objectivity and the validity of qualitative research findings. This paper explores the issues relating to the representativeness or credibility of qualitative research findings. It therefore critiques the existing distinct philosophical and methodological positions concerning the trustworthiness of qualitative research findings, which are described as follows: quantitative studies should be judged using the same criteria and terminology as quanitative studies; it is impossible, in a meaningful way, for any criteria to be used to judge qualitative studies; qualitative studies should be judged using criteria that are developed for and fit the qualitative paradigm; and the credibility of qualitative research findings could be established by testing out the emerging theory by means of conducting a deductive quantitative study. The authors conclude by providing some guidelines for establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings.

U2 - 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01090.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01090.x

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 374

EP - 380

JO - Journal of Advanced Nursing

T2 - Journal of Advanced Nursing

JF - Journal of Advanced Nursing

SN - 0309-2402

IS - 2

ER -