Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research

Felicity Hasson, Sinead Keeney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

181 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The cornerstone of good research is establishing integrity. However, identifying and gauging methodological rigour for the Delphi technique remains elusive. This is due to a number of reasons such as the ongoing epistemological debate, along with continual modifications. Consequently, the scant studies exploring rigour are mainly experimental, component specific and outdated. This paper discusses the literature on establishing rigour in Delphi studies, the methodological trinity of reliability, validity and trustworthiness. In addition it presents a discussion of the principal forms of establishing rigour, such as the application of rigour using both qualitative and quantitative measurements and corroborating results with relevant evidence in the field for each individual Delphi. Addressing such issues will help enhance the development and utilisation of rigour in the future
LanguageEnglish
Pages1695-1704
JournalTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
Volume78
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Delphi Technique
Gaging
Research
Reproducibility of Results
Delphi technique

Cite this

Hasson, Felicity ; Keeney, Sinead. / Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. 2011 ; Vol. 78, No. 9. pp. 1695-1704.
@article{4ed28c816e8447bc80e5644b785a4e64,
title = "Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research",
abstract = "The cornerstone of good research is establishing integrity. However, identifying and gauging methodological rigour for the Delphi technique remains elusive. This is due to a number of reasons such as the ongoing epistemological debate, along with continual modifications. Consequently, the scant studies exploring rigour are mainly experimental, component specific and outdated. This paper discusses the literature on establishing rigour in Delphi studies, the methodological trinity of reliability, validity and trustworthiness. In addition it presents a discussion of the principal forms of establishing rigour, such as the application of rigour using both qualitative and quantitative measurements and corroborating results with relevant evidence in the field for each individual Delphi. Addressing such issues will help enhance the development and utilisation of rigour in the future",
author = "Felicity Hasson and Sinead Keeney",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.005",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "1695--1704",
number = "9",

}

Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. / Hasson, Felicity; Keeney, Sinead.

Vol. 78, No. 9, 11.2011, p. 1695-1704.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research

AU - Hasson, Felicity

AU - Keeney, Sinead

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - The cornerstone of good research is establishing integrity. However, identifying and gauging methodological rigour for the Delphi technique remains elusive. This is due to a number of reasons such as the ongoing epistemological debate, along with continual modifications. Consequently, the scant studies exploring rigour are mainly experimental, component specific and outdated. This paper discusses the literature on establishing rigour in Delphi studies, the methodological trinity of reliability, validity and trustworthiness. In addition it presents a discussion of the principal forms of establishing rigour, such as the application of rigour using both qualitative and quantitative measurements and corroborating results with relevant evidence in the field for each individual Delphi. Addressing such issues will help enhance the development and utilisation of rigour in the future

AB - The cornerstone of good research is establishing integrity. However, identifying and gauging methodological rigour for the Delphi technique remains elusive. This is due to a number of reasons such as the ongoing epistemological debate, along with continual modifications. Consequently, the scant studies exploring rigour are mainly experimental, component specific and outdated. This paper discusses the literature on establishing rigour in Delphi studies, the methodological trinity of reliability, validity and trustworthiness. In addition it presents a discussion of the principal forms of establishing rigour, such as the application of rigour using both qualitative and quantitative measurements and corroborating results with relevant evidence in the field for each individual Delphi. Addressing such issues will help enhance the development and utilisation of rigour in the future

U2 - 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.005

DO - 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.005

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 1695

EP - 1704

IS - 9

ER -