EMTReK: An Evidence-based Model for Transfer & exchange of Research Knowledge: five case studies in Palliative Care

Catherine Payne, Mary Brown, Suzanne Guerin, W.George Kernohan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Knowledge transfer is recognised as a vital stage in evidence-informed nursing with several models available to guide the process. Although the main components involve identification of messages, stakeholders, processes and contexts; the underpinning models remain largely unrefined and untested; and the processes need to be evaluated.
Objective: We set out to verify the “Evidence-based Model for the Transfer and Exchange of Research Knowledge” (EMTReK) using knowledge created from palliative care research.
Methods: Between January 2016 and May 2017, data was collected from five case studies which used the EMTReK model as a means to transfer knowledge relating to palliative care research, undertaken in Ireland. A qualitative approach was taken with thematic analysis of case documentation, semi-structured interviews and field notes from the case studies.
Results: Qualitative analysis supports the core components of EMTReK as a model of knowledge transfer and exchange in palliative care. Results focused upon identification of messages to be transferred to defined stakeholders through interactive processes that take account of context. Case study findings show how the model was interpreted and operationalised by participants and demonstrate its impact on knowledge transfer and exchange. Eight themes were drawn from the data: Credibility of the Model; Model Accessibility; Applicability to Palliative Care; A Matter of Timing; Positive Role of Facilitation; Required Resources; Enhancing Research Quality; Limitations or Areas for Further Consideration.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that study participants found the EMTReK model components were useful to guide knowledge transfer plans when combined with adequate facilitation and guidance. Further exploration of the model’s utility is warranted.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages8
JournalSAGE Open
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 13 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

evidence
knowledge transfer
Palliative Care
stakeholder
credibility
documentation
Ireland
nursing
Knowledge Transfer
interview
resources
Stakeholders
Facilitation

Keywords

  • Evaluation Studies
  • knowledge transfer
  • Knowledge Exchange
  • Stakeholder
  • communication

Cite this

@article{598d85ae89ba443fb05f715693696534,
title = "EMTReK: An Evidence-based Model for Transfer & exchange of Research Knowledge: five case studies in Palliative Care",
abstract = "Introduction: Knowledge transfer is recognised as a vital stage in evidence-informed nursing with several models available to guide the process. Although the main components involve identification of messages, stakeholders, processes and contexts; the underpinning models remain largely unrefined and untested; and the processes need to be evaluated.Objective: We set out to verify the “Evidence-based Model for the Transfer and Exchange of Research Knowledge” (EMTReK) using knowledge created from palliative care research. Methods: Between January 2016 and May 2017, data was collected from five case studies which used the EMTReK model as a means to transfer knowledge relating to palliative care research, undertaken in Ireland. A qualitative approach was taken with thematic analysis of case documentation, semi-structured interviews and field notes from the case studies. Results: Qualitative analysis supports the core components of EMTReK as a model of knowledge transfer and exchange in palliative care. Results focused upon identification of messages to be transferred to defined stakeholders through interactive processes that take account of context. Case study findings show how the model was interpreted and operationalised by participants and demonstrate its impact on knowledge transfer and exchange. Eight themes were drawn from the data: Credibility of the Model; Model Accessibility; Applicability to Palliative Care; A Matter of Timing; Positive Role of Facilitation; Required Resources; Enhancing Research Quality; Limitations or Areas for Further Consideration.Conclusion: The findings indicate that study participants found the EMTReK model components were useful to guide knowledge transfer plans when combined with adequate facilitation and guidance. Further exploration of the model’s utility is warranted.",
keywords = "Evaluation Studies, knowledge transfer, Knowledge Exchange, Stakeholder, communication",
author = "Catherine Payne and Mary Brown and Suzanne Guerin and W.George Kernohan",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "13",
language = "English",
journal = "SAGE Open",
issn = "2158-2440",

}

EMTReK: An Evidence-based Model for Transfer & exchange of Research Knowledge : five case studies in Palliative Care. / Payne, Catherine; Brown, Mary; Guerin, Suzanne; Kernohan, W.George.

In: SAGE Open, 13.06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - EMTReK: An Evidence-based Model for Transfer & exchange of Research Knowledge

T2 - SAGE Open

AU - Payne, Catherine

AU - Brown, Mary

AU - Guerin, Suzanne

AU - Kernohan, W.George

PY - 2019/6/13

Y1 - 2019/6/13

N2 - Introduction: Knowledge transfer is recognised as a vital stage in evidence-informed nursing with several models available to guide the process. Although the main components involve identification of messages, stakeholders, processes and contexts; the underpinning models remain largely unrefined and untested; and the processes need to be evaluated.Objective: We set out to verify the “Evidence-based Model for the Transfer and Exchange of Research Knowledge” (EMTReK) using knowledge created from palliative care research. Methods: Between January 2016 and May 2017, data was collected from five case studies which used the EMTReK model as a means to transfer knowledge relating to palliative care research, undertaken in Ireland. A qualitative approach was taken with thematic analysis of case documentation, semi-structured interviews and field notes from the case studies. Results: Qualitative analysis supports the core components of EMTReK as a model of knowledge transfer and exchange in palliative care. Results focused upon identification of messages to be transferred to defined stakeholders through interactive processes that take account of context. Case study findings show how the model was interpreted and operationalised by participants and demonstrate its impact on knowledge transfer and exchange. Eight themes were drawn from the data: Credibility of the Model; Model Accessibility; Applicability to Palliative Care; A Matter of Timing; Positive Role of Facilitation; Required Resources; Enhancing Research Quality; Limitations or Areas for Further Consideration.Conclusion: The findings indicate that study participants found the EMTReK model components were useful to guide knowledge transfer plans when combined with adequate facilitation and guidance. Further exploration of the model’s utility is warranted.

AB - Introduction: Knowledge transfer is recognised as a vital stage in evidence-informed nursing with several models available to guide the process. Although the main components involve identification of messages, stakeholders, processes and contexts; the underpinning models remain largely unrefined and untested; and the processes need to be evaluated.Objective: We set out to verify the “Evidence-based Model for the Transfer and Exchange of Research Knowledge” (EMTReK) using knowledge created from palliative care research. Methods: Between January 2016 and May 2017, data was collected from five case studies which used the EMTReK model as a means to transfer knowledge relating to palliative care research, undertaken in Ireland. A qualitative approach was taken with thematic analysis of case documentation, semi-structured interviews and field notes from the case studies. Results: Qualitative analysis supports the core components of EMTReK as a model of knowledge transfer and exchange in palliative care. Results focused upon identification of messages to be transferred to defined stakeholders through interactive processes that take account of context. Case study findings show how the model was interpreted and operationalised by participants and demonstrate its impact on knowledge transfer and exchange. Eight themes were drawn from the data: Credibility of the Model; Model Accessibility; Applicability to Palliative Care; A Matter of Timing; Positive Role of Facilitation; Required Resources; Enhancing Research Quality; Limitations or Areas for Further Consideration.Conclusion: The findings indicate that study participants found the EMTReK model components were useful to guide knowledge transfer plans when combined with adequate facilitation and guidance. Further exploration of the model’s utility is warranted.

KW - Evaluation Studies

KW - knowledge transfer

KW - Knowledge Exchange

KW - Stakeholder

KW - communication

M3 - Article

JO - SAGE Open

JF - SAGE Open

SN - 2158-2440

ER -