Effects of Fatigue on Running Mechanics Associated with Tibial Stress Fracture Risk

Adam C. Clansey, Michael Hanlon, Eric S. Wallace, Mark J. Lake

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

107 Citations (Scopus)


Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the acute effects of progressive fatigue on the parameters of runningmechanics previously associated with tibial stress fracture risk.Methods: Twenty-one trained male distance runners performed three sets (Pre, Mid, and Post) of six overground running trials at 4.5 mIsj1 (T5%). Kinematic and kinetic data were collected during each trial using a 12-camera motion capture system, force platform,and head and leg accelerometers. Between tests, each runner ran on a treadmill for 20 min at their corresponding lactate threshold (LT) speed. Perceived exertion levels (RPE) were recorded at the third and last minute of each treadmill run. Results: RPE scores increased from 11.8 T 1.3 to 14.4 T 1.5 at the end of the first LT run and then further to 17.4 T 1.6 by the end of the second LT run. Peak rearfoot eversion, peak axial head acceleration, peak free moment and vertical force loading rates were shown to increase (P G 0.05) with moderate–large effect sizes during the progression from Pre to Post tests, although vertical impact peak and peak axial tibial acceleration were not significantly affected by the high-intensity running bouts. Conclusion: Previously identified risk factors for impact-related injuries (such as tibial stress fracture) are modified with fatigue. Because fatigue is associated with a reduced tolerance for impact, these findings lend support to the importance of those measures to identify individuals at risk of injury from lower limb impact loading during running.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1917-1923
JournalMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - Oct 2012

Bibliographical note

Reference text: 1. Abt JP, Sell TC, Chu Y, Lovalekar M, Burdett RG, Lephart SM. Running kinematics and shock absorption do not change after brief exhaustive running. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(6):1479–85.
2. Begon M, Monnet T, Lacouture P. Effects of movement for estimating the hip joint centre. Gait Posture. 2007;25(3):353–9.
3. Bennell KL, Crossley K, Jayarajan J, et al. Ground reaction forces and bone parameters in females with tibial stress fracture. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(3):397–404.
4. Bennell KL, Malcolm SA, Thomas SA, Wark JD, Brukner PD. The incidence and distribution of stress fractures in competitive track and field athletes: a twelve-month prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24(2):211–7.
5. Christina KA, White SC, Gilchrist LA. Effect of localized muscle fatigue on vertical ground reaction forces and ankle joint motion during running. Hum Mov Sci. 2001;20(3):257–76.
6. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988. pp. 8–14.
7. Collins TD, Ghoussayni SN, Ewins DJ, Kent JA. A six degreesof- freedom marker set for gait analysis: repeatability and comparison with a modified Helen Hayes set. Gait Posture. 2009; 30(2):173–80.
8. Coventry E, O’Connor KM, Hart BA, Earl JE, Ebersole KT. The effect of lower extremity fatigue on shock attenuation during single-leg landing. Clin Biomech. 2006;21(10):1090–7.
9. Crossley K, Bennell KL, Wrigley T, Oakes BW. Ground reaction forces, bone characteristics, and tibial stress fracture in male runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31(8):1088–93.
10. Davis I, Bowser B, Mullineaux D. Do impacts cause running injuries? A prospective investigation. In: Conference proceedings of the 34th ASB. 2010. p. 248–9.
11. Davis I, Milner CE, Hamill J, Davis IS. Does increased loading during running lead to tibial stress fractures? A prospective study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(5):S58.
12. Dempster WT. Space requirements of the seated operator. WADC Tech Rep. 1955:55–159.
13. Denadai BS, Greco CC, Tufik S, De Mello MT. Effects of high intensity running to fatigue on isokinetic muscular strength in endurance athletes. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2007;15(4):281–5.
14. Derrick TR. The effects of knee contact angle on impact forces and accelerations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(5):832–7.
15. Derrick TR, Dereu D, McLean SP. Impacts and kinematic adjustments during an exhaustive run. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34 (6):998–1002.
16. Dierks TA, Davis IS, Hamill J. The effects of running in an exerted state on lower extremity kinematics and joint timing. J Biomech. 2010;43(15):2993–8.
17. Dierks TA, Manal KT, Hamill J, Davis I. Lower extremity kinematics in runners with patellofemoral pain during a prolonged run. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(4):693–700.
18. Farley CT, Gonza´lez O. Leg stiffness and stride frequency in human running. J Biomech. 1996;29(2):181–6.
19. Gerlach KE, White SC, Burton HW, Dorn JM, Leddy JJ, Horvath PJ. Kinetic changes with fatigue and relationship to injury in female runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(4):657–63.
20. Gerritsen KGM, van den Bogert AJ, Nigg BM. Direct dynamics simulation of the impact phase in heel-toe running. J Biomech. 1995;28(6):661–8.
21. Grimston S, Engsberg J, Kloiber R, Hanley D. Bone mass, external loads, and stress fractures in female runners. Int J Sport Biomech. 1991;7:293–302.
22. Grood ES, Suntay WJ. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng. 1983;105:136–44.
23. Harrast MA, Colonno D. Stress fractures in runners. Clin Sports Med. 2010;29(3):399–416.
24. Holden JP, Cavanagh PR. The free moment of ground reaction in distance running and its changes with pronation. J Biomech. 1991; 24(10):887–97.
25. Hreljac A. Etiology, prevention, and early intervention of overuse injuries in runners: a biomechanical perspective. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2005;16(3):651–67.
26. Hreljac A, Ferber R. A biomechanical perspective of predicting injury risk in running. Int Sportsmed J. 2006;7(2):98–108.
27. Johnson AW, Weiss CB, Wheeler DL. Stress fractures of the femoral shaft in athletes—more common than expected. A new clinical test. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22(2):248–56.
28. Keller T, Weisberger A, Ray J, Hasan S, Shiavi R, Spengler D. Relationship between vertical ground reaction force and speed during walking, slow jogging, and running. Clin Biomech. 1996; 11(5):253–9.
29. Komi PV. Stretch-shortening cycle: a powerful model to study normal and fatigued muscle. J Biomech. 2000;33(10):1197–206.
30. Lafortune MA, Lake MJ, Hennig EM. Transfer function between tibial acceleration and ground reaction force. J Biomech. 1995; 28(1):113–7.
31. Leetun D, Ireland M, Willson J, Ballantyne B, Davis I. Core stability measures as risk factors for lower extremity injury in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(6):926–34.
32. Mercer J, Bates BT, Dufek J, Hreljac A. Characteristics of shock attenuation during fatigued running. J Sports Sci. 2003;21 (11):911–9.
33. Miller RH, Lowry JL, Meardon SA, Gillette JC. Lower extremity mechanics of iliotibial band syndrome during an exhaustive run. Gait Posture. 2007;26(3):407–13.
34. Milner CE, Ferber R, Pollard CD, Hamill J, Davis IS. Biomechanical factors associated with tibial stress fracture in female runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(2):323–8.
35. Milner CE, Hamill J, Davis I. Are knee mechanics during early stance related to tibial stress fracture in runners? Clin Biomech. 2007;22(6):697–703.
36. Mizrahi J, Verbitsky O, Isakov E, Daily D. Effect of fatigue on leg kinematics and impact acceleration in long distance running. Hum Mov Sci. 2000;19(2):139–51.
37. Nicol C, Komi PV, Marconnet P. Fatigue effects of marathon running on neuromuscular performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1991; 1(1):10–7.
38. Pohl MB, Mullineaux DR, Milner CE, Hamill J, Davis IS. Biomechanical predictors of retrospective tibial stress fractures in runners. J Biomech. 2008;41(6):1160–5.
39. Radin EL. Role of muscles in protecting athletes from injury. Acta Med Scand. 1986;220(S711):143–7.
40. Saldanha A, Nordlund Ekblom MM, Thorstensson A. Central fatigue affects plantar flexor strength after prolonged running. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008;18(3):383–8.
41. Skof B, Strojnik V. Neuromuscular fatigue and recovery dynamics following prolonged continuous run at anaerobic threshold. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(3):219–22.
42. Steed J, Gaesser GA, Weltman A. Rating of perceived exertion and blood lactate concentration during submaximal running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;26(6):797–803.
43. Verbitsky O, Mizrahi J, Voloshin A, Treiger J, Isakov E. Shock transmission and fatigue in human running. J Appl Biomech. 1998;14:300–11.
44. Voloshin AS, Mizrahi J, Verbitsky O, Isakov E. Dynamic loading on the human musculoskeletal system—effect of fatigue. Clin Biomech. 1998;13(7):515–20.
45. Winter DA. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. 4th ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 2009. pp. 70–3.
46. Winter EM. Sport and Exercise Physiology Testing Guidelines: The British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences Guide. London: Routledge; 2006. pp 112–20.


  • High Intensity
  • Kinematics
  • Kinetics
  • Overuse Injury Potential
  • Runners


Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of Fatigue on Running Mechanics Associated with Tibial Stress Fracture Risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this