Effectiveness of policy measures and language dynamics

Michele Gazzola, Bengt-Arne Wickström, Torsten Templin

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

The effect of a given language policy can be very different in the short, medium and long run. We illustrate this, looking at the effects of language planning on inclusion given different mobility patterns. The choice is between different status and acquisition planning measures. This choice gives rise to different degrees of inclusion (in the form of bilingualism) given the costs of the policy and the linguistic environment. In a mobility/inclusion trade-off, a higher level of inclusion can be reached for a given amount of migration through a well-designed language policy. Different scenarios require different policy measures in the cost-effectiveness analysis. The effects of status and acquisition planning are modelled in a dynamic setting, where language learning depends on compulsory measures as well as voluntary decisions by the individuals involved based on their individual cost-benefit calculations (or those of their parents). The effects on inclusion are simulated in various scenarios when language skills are transferred from one generation to the next. The scenarios include migration of majority-language speakers into a region with a strong minority language (Spanish-speakers migrating into the Basque Country) and migration of speakers of a ‘foreign’ language into a country with enclaves of speakers of this language (Spanish-speakers in the USA).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAdvances in Interdisciplinary Language Policy
EditorsFrançois Grin, László Marácz, Nike K. Pokorn
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company
Pages320–342
ISBN (Electronic)9789027258274
ISBN (Print)9789027210159
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jan 2022

Keywords

  • language policy
  • language dynamics
  • Policy Evaluation
  • language planning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of policy measures and language dynamics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this