Does the level of graphical detail of a virtual handball thrower influence a goal-keeper's motor response?

N. Vignais, B. Bideau, Cathy Craig, S. Brault, F. Multon, P. Delamarche, R. Kulpa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors investigated how different levels of detail (LODs) of a virtual throwing action can influence a handball goalkeeper's motor response. Goalkeepers attempted to stop a virtual ball emanating from five different graphical LODs of the same virtual throwing action. The five levels of detail were: a textured reference level (L0), a non-textured level (L1), a wire-frame level (L2), a point-light-display (PLD) representation (L3) and a PLD level with reduced ball size (L4). For each motor response made by the goalkeeper we measured and analyzed the time to respond (TTR), the percentage of successful motor responses, the distance between the ball and the closest limb (when the stopping motion was incorrect) and the kinematics of the motion. Results showed that TTR, percentage of successful motor responses and distance with the closest limb were not significantly different for any of the five different graphical LODs. However the kinematics of the motion revealed that the trajectory of the stopping limb was significantly different when comparing the L1 and L3 levels, and when comparing the L1 and L4 levels. These differences in the control of the goalkeeper's actions suggests that the different level of information available in the PLD representations ( L3 and L4) are causing the goalkeeper to adopt different motor strategies to control the approach of their limb to stop the ball.
LanguageEnglish
Pages501-508
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Sports Science and Medicine
Volume8
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Extremities
Biomechanical Phenomena
Light

Cite this

Vignais, N. ; Bideau, B. ; Craig, Cathy ; Brault, S. ; Multon, F. ; Delamarche, P. ; Kulpa, R. / Does the level of graphical detail of a virtual handball thrower influence a goal-keeper's motor response?. In: Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 8. pp. 501-508.
@article{ca8ee768f5d84d32ac8e94534a0ac7cf,
title = "Does the level of graphical detail of a virtual handball thrower influence a goal-keeper's motor response?",
abstract = "The authors investigated how different levels of detail (LODs) of a virtual throwing action can influence a handball goalkeeper's motor response. Goalkeepers attempted to stop a virtual ball emanating from five different graphical LODs of the same virtual throwing action. The five levels of detail were: a textured reference level (L0), a non-textured level (L1), a wire-frame level (L2), a point-light-display (PLD) representation (L3) and a PLD level with reduced ball size (L4). For each motor response made by the goalkeeper we measured and analyzed the time to respond (TTR), the percentage of successful motor responses, the distance between the ball and the closest limb (when the stopping motion was incorrect) and the kinematics of the motion. Results showed that TTR, percentage of successful motor responses and distance with the closest limb were not significantly different for any of the five different graphical LODs. However the kinematics of the motion revealed that the trajectory of the stopping limb was significantly different when comparing the L1 and L3 levels, and when comparing the L1 and L4 levels. These differences in the control of the goalkeeper's actions suggests that the different level of information available in the PLD representations ( L3 and L4) are causing the goalkeeper to adopt different motor strategies to control the approach of their limb to stop the ball.",
author = "N. Vignais and B. Bideau and Cathy Craig and S. Brault and F. Multon and P. Delamarche and R. Kulpa",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "501--508",
journal = "Journal of Sports Science and Medicine",
issn = "1303-2968",

}

Does the level of graphical detail of a virtual handball thrower influence a goal-keeper's motor response? / Vignais, N.; Bideau, B.; Craig, Cathy; Brault, S.; Multon, F.; Delamarche, P.; Kulpa, R.

In: Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, Vol. 8, 2009, p. 501-508.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does the level of graphical detail of a virtual handball thrower influence a goal-keeper's motor response?

AU - Vignais, N.

AU - Bideau, B.

AU - Craig, Cathy

AU - Brault, S.

AU - Multon, F.

AU - Delamarche, P.

AU - Kulpa, R.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The authors investigated how different levels of detail (LODs) of a virtual throwing action can influence a handball goalkeeper's motor response. Goalkeepers attempted to stop a virtual ball emanating from five different graphical LODs of the same virtual throwing action. The five levels of detail were: a textured reference level (L0), a non-textured level (L1), a wire-frame level (L2), a point-light-display (PLD) representation (L3) and a PLD level with reduced ball size (L4). For each motor response made by the goalkeeper we measured and analyzed the time to respond (TTR), the percentage of successful motor responses, the distance between the ball and the closest limb (when the stopping motion was incorrect) and the kinematics of the motion. Results showed that TTR, percentage of successful motor responses and distance with the closest limb were not significantly different for any of the five different graphical LODs. However the kinematics of the motion revealed that the trajectory of the stopping limb was significantly different when comparing the L1 and L3 levels, and when comparing the L1 and L4 levels. These differences in the control of the goalkeeper's actions suggests that the different level of information available in the PLD representations ( L3 and L4) are causing the goalkeeper to adopt different motor strategies to control the approach of their limb to stop the ball.

AB - The authors investigated how different levels of detail (LODs) of a virtual throwing action can influence a handball goalkeeper's motor response. Goalkeepers attempted to stop a virtual ball emanating from five different graphical LODs of the same virtual throwing action. The five levels of detail were: a textured reference level (L0), a non-textured level (L1), a wire-frame level (L2), a point-light-display (PLD) representation (L3) and a PLD level with reduced ball size (L4). For each motor response made by the goalkeeper we measured and analyzed the time to respond (TTR), the percentage of successful motor responses, the distance between the ball and the closest limb (when the stopping motion was incorrect) and the kinematics of the motion. Results showed that TTR, percentage of successful motor responses and distance with the closest limb were not significantly different for any of the five different graphical LODs. However the kinematics of the motion revealed that the trajectory of the stopping limb was significantly different when comparing the L1 and L3 levels, and when comparing the L1 and L4 levels. These differences in the control of the goalkeeper's actions suggests that the different level of information available in the PLD representations ( L3 and L4) are causing the goalkeeper to adopt different motor strategies to control the approach of their limb to stop the ball.

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 501

EP - 508

JO - Journal of Sports Science and Medicine

T2 - Journal of Sports Science and Medicine

JF - Journal of Sports Science and Medicine

SN - 1303-2968

ER -