Do we need stochastic models for healthcare? The case of ICATS?

Jennifer Gillespie, Sally McClean, Francis FitzGibbon, Bryan Scotney, Frank Dobbs, Brian Meenan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Healthcare stakeholders require accurate and reliable models to aid performance management, but there is an issue as to whether deterministic or stochastic modelling is more appropriate. Deterministic models are usually simpler, more easily understood, and less data intensive. However, stochastic models tend to be more realistic, but require significant data to develop a realistic model. We illustrate that when queueing is a defining property of the problem semantics then we need suitable data and a model that allows us to describe and characterise the relationship between the queueing process, its parameters and delay. By comparing an analytic deterministic model with a stochastic simulation of an orthopaedic Integrated Clinical Assessment and Treatment Service, we show that when uncertainty is ignored in the planning stages then there will be a deficiency in the number of staff allocated. This causes queues to build up and it follows that patients will receive a diminished quality of care.
LanguageEnglish
Pages293-303
JournalJournal of Simulation
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Stochastic model
Healthcare
Queueing
Stochastic modeling
Staff
Planning
Performance management
Queue
Stochastic simulation
Stakeholders
Integrated
Quality of care
Process parameters
Uncertainty

Cite this

Gillespie, Jennifer ; McClean, Sally ; FitzGibbon, Francis ; Scotney, Bryan ; Dobbs, Frank ; Meenan, Brian. / Do we need stochastic models for healthcare? The case of ICATS?. In: Journal of Simulation. 2014 ; Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 293-303.
@article{daea7c858dcb492092322169f67c1f96,
title = "Do we need stochastic models for healthcare? The case of ICATS?",
abstract = "Healthcare stakeholders require accurate and reliable models to aid performance management, but there is an issue as to whether deterministic or stochastic modelling is more appropriate. Deterministic models are usually simpler, more easily understood, and less data intensive. However, stochastic models tend to be more realistic, but require significant data to develop a realistic model. We illustrate that when queueing is a defining property of the problem semantics then we need suitable data and a model that allows us to describe and characterise the relationship between the queueing process, its parameters and delay. By comparing an analytic deterministic model with a stochastic simulation of an orthopaedic Integrated Clinical Assessment and Treatment Service, we show that when uncertainty is ignored in the planning stages then there will be a deficiency in the number of staff allocated. This causes queues to build up and it follows that patients will receive a diminished quality of care.",
author = "Jennifer Gillespie and Sally McClean and Francis FitzGibbon and Bryan Scotney and Frank Dobbs and Brian Meenan",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1057/jos.2014.8",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "293--303",
journal = "Journal of Simulation",
issn = "1747-7778",
number = "4",

}

Do we need stochastic models for healthcare? The case of ICATS? / Gillespie, Jennifer; McClean, Sally; FitzGibbon, Francis; Scotney, Bryan; Dobbs, Frank; Meenan, Brian.

In: Journal of Simulation, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2014, p. 293-303.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do we need stochastic models for healthcare? The case of ICATS?

AU - Gillespie, Jennifer

AU - McClean, Sally

AU - FitzGibbon, Francis

AU - Scotney, Bryan

AU - Dobbs, Frank

AU - Meenan, Brian

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Healthcare stakeholders require accurate and reliable models to aid performance management, but there is an issue as to whether deterministic or stochastic modelling is more appropriate. Deterministic models are usually simpler, more easily understood, and less data intensive. However, stochastic models tend to be more realistic, but require significant data to develop a realistic model. We illustrate that when queueing is a defining property of the problem semantics then we need suitable data and a model that allows us to describe and characterise the relationship between the queueing process, its parameters and delay. By comparing an analytic deterministic model with a stochastic simulation of an orthopaedic Integrated Clinical Assessment and Treatment Service, we show that when uncertainty is ignored in the planning stages then there will be a deficiency in the number of staff allocated. This causes queues to build up and it follows that patients will receive a diminished quality of care.

AB - Healthcare stakeholders require accurate and reliable models to aid performance management, but there is an issue as to whether deterministic or stochastic modelling is more appropriate. Deterministic models are usually simpler, more easily understood, and less data intensive. However, stochastic models tend to be more realistic, but require significant data to develop a realistic model. We illustrate that when queueing is a defining property of the problem semantics then we need suitable data and a model that allows us to describe and characterise the relationship between the queueing process, its parameters and delay. By comparing an analytic deterministic model with a stochastic simulation of an orthopaedic Integrated Clinical Assessment and Treatment Service, we show that when uncertainty is ignored in the planning stages then there will be a deficiency in the number of staff allocated. This causes queues to build up and it follows that patients will receive a diminished quality of care.

U2 - 10.1057/jos.2014.8

DO - 10.1057/jos.2014.8

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 293

EP - 303

JO - Journal of Simulation

T2 - Journal of Simulation

JF - Journal of Simulation

SN - 1747-7778

IS - 4

ER -