Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Discussing methodological gaps in psychosocial intervention research for dementia: an opinion article from the INTERDEM Methodology Taskforce guided by the MRC framework

  • Sara Laureen Bartels
  • , Nathan Stephens
  • , Federica D'Andrea
  • , Melanie Handley
  • , Marine Markaryan
  • , Andrea Nakakawa Bernal
  • , Lieve Van den Block
  • , Simone R de Bruin
  • , Karen Windle
  • , Martina Roes
  • , Niels Janssen
  • , Hannah Christie
  • , Lesley Garcia
  • , Gwen Teesing
  • , Esme Moniz-Cook
  • , Maud Graff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Downloads (Pure)
Original languageEnglish
Article number1458023
JournalFrontiers in Dementia
Volume3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 26 Sept 2024

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Alzheimer's Association, Advancing Research on Care and Outcome Measurement (ARCOM) programme under the grant number ARCOM-24-1250087 awarded to MG, and executed in collaboration with SLB and FD'A. The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Alzheimer's Association. Funding details of the studies cited in this work are listed below: the HOMEDEM network received funding from European Union's EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Europe Horizon Europe (HORIZON) Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Doctoral Networks (MSCA-DN) under the grant agreement 101072827. The CONNECT study was funded by Alzheimer's Society (UK) under the grant number 516 AS-PG-19a-010.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • dementia care
  • psychosocial intervention
  • support
  • methodology
  • public involvement
  • theory-driven
  • context
  • complexity

Cite this