Discretion and Law in the British and Irish Social Welfare Systems

Liam Thornton

    Research output: Non-textual formWeb publication/site

    Abstract

    The debate on whether a welfare system imposes either a rule based or discretionarysystem, while appearing a simple academic study at first, is one of enormoussignificance for the many hundreds of thousands of people who rely on social welfarepayments each week to maintain subsistence. Imagine the decision of whether aperson could eat, cloth herself or pay the rent being held by one individual. Imaginefurther, a person who does not reach the required legislative requirements for a givenwelfare payment, suffering insurmountable hardship because of this legislativeprovision. Both these examples are at the extremes of the discretion versus lawdebate; however it serves to remind us that one, without the other, may have potentialdisastrous consequences for an individual. This paper shall outline the arguments forand against both systems, and give examples of how relying on either law ordiscretion independently has resulted in perplexing results.
    LanguageEnglish
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2005

    Fingerprint

    social welfare
    studies (academic)
    Law
    rent
    welfare
    human being

    Cite this

    Thornton, Liam (Author). / Discretion and Law in the British and Irish Social Welfare Systems. [Web publication/site].
    @misc{bc7805dd655e4a318b8e8e135de54d03,
    title = "Discretion and Law in the British and Irish Social Welfare Systems",
    abstract = "The debate on whether a welfare system imposes either a rule based or discretionarysystem, while appearing a simple academic study at first, is one of enormoussignificance for the many hundreds of thousands of people who rely on social welfarepayments each week to maintain subsistence. Imagine the decision of whether aperson could eat, cloth herself or pay the rent being held by one individual. Imaginefurther, a person who does not reach the required legislative requirements for a givenwelfare payment, suffering insurmountable hardship because of this legislativeprovision. Both these examples are at the extremes of the discretion versus lawdebate; however it serves to remind us that one, without the other, may have potentialdisastrous consequences for an individual. This paper shall outline the arguments forand against both systems, and give examples of how relying on either law ordiscretion independently has resulted in perplexing results.",
    author = "Liam Thornton",
    year = "2005",
    month = "4",
    day = "1",
    language = "English",

    }

    Discretion and Law in the British and Irish Social Welfare Systems. Thornton, Liam (Author). 2005.

    Research output: Non-textual formWeb publication/site

    TY - ADVS

    T1 - Discretion and Law in the British and Irish Social Welfare Systems

    AU - Thornton, Liam

    PY - 2005/4/1

    Y1 - 2005/4/1

    N2 - The debate on whether a welfare system imposes either a rule based or discretionarysystem, while appearing a simple academic study at first, is one of enormoussignificance for the many hundreds of thousands of people who rely on social welfarepayments each week to maintain subsistence. Imagine the decision of whether aperson could eat, cloth herself or pay the rent being held by one individual. Imaginefurther, a person who does not reach the required legislative requirements for a givenwelfare payment, suffering insurmountable hardship because of this legislativeprovision. Both these examples are at the extremes of the discretion versus lawdebate; however it serves to remind us that one, without the other, may have potentialdisastrous consequences for an individual. This paper shall outline the arguments forand against both systems, and give examples of how relying on either law ordiscretion independently has resulted in perplexing results.

    AB - The debate on whether a welfare system imposes either a rule based or discretionarysystem, while appearing a simple academic study at first, is one of enormoussignificance for the many hundreds of thousands of people who rely on social welfarepayments each week to maintain subsistence. Imagine the decision of whether aperson could eat, cloth herself or pay the rent being held by one individual. Imaginefurther, a person who does not reach the required legislative requirements for a givenwelfare payment, suffering insurmountable hardship because of this legislativeprovision. Both these examples are at the extremes of the discretion versus lawdebate; however it serves to remind us that one, without the other, may have potentialdisastrous consequences for an individual. This paper shall outline the arguments forand against both systems, and give examples of how relying on either law ordiscretion independently has resulted in perplexing results.

    M3 - Web publication/site

    ER -