Discourse in the shadows: Discursive construction and the Northern Ireland Assembly

John Wilson, Karyn Stapleton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Parliamentary discourse (PD) is shaped by pre-defined rules, which may be strategically transgressed to achieve political goals. Here, we examine a relatively unique form of PD, the discourse of the ‘Shadow Assembly’, which was tasked with establishing the procedures of the new Northern Ireland Assembly (1998). Using a discursive constructionist perspective, which emphasizes the intersection between social theory and sociolinguistics, we examine how Members of the Assembly vie to discursively establish the fundamental parameters of political behaviour within the Assembly. These included address terms, speaking rights and, indeed, which language members should speak. Hence, we have a rare opportunity to examine how discursive construction mediates the future forms of interactional limits and constraints. In particular, we consider PD in a context where the rules are not pre-established and there is, moreover, a strong history of socio-political conflict. We also consider the role of culture in shaping and constituting PD.
LanguageEnglish
Pages69-92
JournalDiscourse and Society
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

discourse
political goal
political behavior
political conflict
sociolinguistics
speaking
Discourse
Northern Ireland
Discursive Construction
Parliamentary Discourse
history
language
Fundamental
Interaction
Political Behavior
History
Address Terms
Language
Social Theory
Discursive

Cite this

@article{5390e830bdb7406491cb4a4abe8d6b21,
title = "Discourse in the shadows: Discursive construction and the Northern Ireland Assembly",
abstract = "Parliamentary discourse (PD) is shaped by pre-defined rules, which may be strategically transgressed to achieve political goals. Here, we examine a relatively unique form of PD, the discourse of the ‘Shadow Assembly’, which was tasked with establishing the procedures of the new Northern Ireland Assembly (1998). Using a discursive constructionist perspective, which emphasizes the intersection between social theory and sociolinguistics, we examine how Members of the Assembly vie to discursively establish the fundamental parameters of political behaviour within the Assembly. These included address terms, speaking rights and, indeed, which language members should speak. Hence, we have a rare opportunity to examine how discursive construction mediates the future forms of interactional limits and constraints. In particular, we consider PD in a context where the rules are not pre-established and there is, moreover, a strong history of socio-political conflict. We also consider the role of culture in shaping and constituting PD.",
author = "John Wilson and Karyn Stapleton",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1177/0957926511419930",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "69--92",
journal = "Discourse and Society",
issn = "0957-9265",
number = "1",

}

Discourse in the shadows: Discursive construction and the Northern Ireland Assembly. / Wilson, John; Stapleton, Karyn.

In: Discourse and Society, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2012, p. 69-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discourse in the shadows: Discursive construction and the Northern Ireland Assembly

AU - Wilson, John

AU - Stapleton, Karyn

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Parliamentary discourse (PD) is shaped by pre-defined rules, which may be strategically transgressed to achieve political goals. Here, we examine a relatively unique form of PD, the discourse of the ‘Shadow Assembly’, which was tasked with establishing the procedures of the new Northern Ireland Assembly (1998). Using a discursive constructionist perspective, which emphasizes the intersection between social theory and sociolinguistics, we examine how Members of the Assembly vie to discursively establish the fundamental parameters of political behaviour within the Assembly. These included address terms, speaking rights and, indeed, which language members should speak. Hence, we have a rare opportunity to examine how discursive construction mediates the future forms of interactional limits and constraints. In particular, we consider PD in a context where the rules are not pre-established and there is, moreover, a strong history of socio-political conflict. We also consider the role of culture in shaping and constituting PD.

AB - Parliamentary discourse (PD) is shaped by pre-defined rules, which may be strategically transgressed to achieve political goals. Here, we examine a relatively unique form of PD, the discourse of the ‘Shadow Assembly’, which was tasked with establishing the procedures of the new Northern Ireland Assembly (1998). Using a discursive constructionist perspective, which emphasizes the intersection between social theory and sociolinguistics, we examine how Members of the Assembly vie to discursively establish the fundamental parameters of political behaviour within the Assembly. These included address terms, speaking rights and, indeed, which language members should speak. Hence, we have a rare opportunity to examine how discursive construction mediates the future forms of interactional limits and constraints. In particular, we consider PD in a context where the rules are not pre-established and there is, moreover, a strong history of socio-political conflict. We also consider the role of culture in shaping and constituting PD.

U2 - 10.1177/0957926511419930

DO - 10.1177/0957926511419930

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 69

EP - 92

JO - Discourse and Society

T2 - Discourse and Society

JF - Discourse and Society

SN - 0957-9265

IS - 1

ER -