Dimensional analysis of the coping strategy indicator in a sample of elderly veterans with acquired limb amputations

DM Desmond, Mark Shevlin, M MacLachlan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Coping Strategy Indicator (CSI), developed by Amirkhan (1990), is intended as a `widely applicable' self-report measure of situational coping encompassing the strategies of avoidance, problem solving and seeking social support. Nonetheless, the instrument's initial development phase was exclusively premised on Californian samples, prompting Parker and Endler (1992) to highlight the need for cross-validation with other populations. The aim of this study was to examine the factor structure of the Coping Strategy Indicator in a sample of 618 British individuals with a chronic health challenge, namely amputation of a limb(s). Confirmatory factor analyses were used to compare four different models of the CSI structure (one-factor, three-orthogonal factors, three-oblique factors and four-oblique factors). The results indicate that the oblique-three-factor model, coherent with the subscales derived in the original sample (Amirkhan, 1990) provided adequate fit to the data. An oblique four-factor model described by Ager and MacLachlan (1998) provided the best fit. Further research is necessary in terms of developing and scoring the instrument as a four-dimensional tool. These results provide further support for the suggestion that the scale is generalizable across population, cultural, and situational variation. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
LanguageEnglish
Pages249-259
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2006

Fingerprint

dimensional analysis
coping
social support
health

Cite this

@article{d2d95271fe774b43a2a05f588999bf4c,
title = "Dimensional analysis of the coping strategy indicator in a sample of elderly veterans with acquired limb amputations",
abstract = "The Coping Strategy Indicator (CSI), developed by Amirkhan (1990), is intended as a `widely applicable' self-report measure of situational coping encompassing the strategies of avoidance, problem solving and seeking social support. Nonetheless, the instrument's initial development phase was exclusively premised on Californian samples, prompting Parker and Endler (1992) to highlight the need for cross-validation with other populations. The aim of this study was to examine the factor structure of the Coping Strategy Indicator in a sample of 618 British individuals with a chronic health challenge, namely amputation of a limb(s). Confirmatory factor analyses were used to compare four different models of the CSI structure (one-factor, three-orthogonal factors, three-oblique factors and four-oblique factors). The results indicate that the oblique-three-factor model, coherent with the subscales derived in the original sample (Amirkhan, 1990) provided adequate fit to the data. An oblique four-factor model described by Ager and MacLachlan (1998) provided the best fit. Further research is necessary in terms of developing and scoring the instrument as a four-dimensional tool. These results provide further support for the suggestion that the scale is generalizable across population, cultural, and situational variation. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd.",
author = "DM Desmond and Mark Shevlin and M MacLachlan",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.015",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "249--259",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Dimensional analysis of the coping strategy indicator in a sample of elderly veterans with acquired limb amputations. / Desmond, DM; Shevlin, Mark; MacLachlan, M.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 40, No. 2, 01.2006, p. 249-259.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dimensional analysis of the coping strategy indicator in a sample of elderly veterans with acquired limb amputations

AU - Desmond, DM

AU - Shevlin, Mark

AU - MacLachlan, M

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - The Coping Strategy Indicator (CSI), developed by Amirkhan (1990), is intended as a `widely applicable' self-report measure of situational coping encompassing the strategies of avoidance, problem solving and seeking social support. Nonetheless, the instrument's initial development phase was exclusively premised on Californian samples, prompting Parker and Endler (1992) to highlight the need for cross-validation with other populations. The aim of this study was to examine the factor structure of the Coping Strategy Indicator in a sample of 618 British individuals with a chronic health challenge, namely amputation of a limb(s). Confirmatory factor analyses were used to compare four different models of the CSI structure (one-factor, three-orthogonal factors, three-oblique factors and four-oblique factors). The results indicate that the oblique-three-factor model, coherent with the subscales derived in the original sample (Amirkhan, 1990) provided adequate fit to the data. An oblique four-factor model described by Ager and MacLachlan (1998) provided the best fit. Further research is necessary in terms of developing and scoring the instrument as a four-dimensional tool. These results provide further support for the suggestion that the scale is generalizable across population, cultural, and situational variation. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

AB - The Coping Strategy Indicator (CSI), developed by Amirkhan (1990), is intended as a `widely applicable' self-report measure of situational coping encompassing the strategies of avoidance, problem solving and seeking social support. Nonetheless, the instrument's initial development phase was exclusively premised on Californian samples, prompting Parker and Endler (1992) to highlight the need for cross-validation with other populations. The aim of this study was to examine the factor structure of the Coping Strategy Indicator in a sample of 618 British individuals with a chronic health challenge, namely amputation of a limb(s). Confirmatory factor analyses were used to compare four different models of the CSI structure (one-factor, three-orthogonal factors, three-oblique factors and four-oblique factors). The results indicate that the oblique-three-factor model, coherent with the subscales derived in the original sample (Amirkhan, 1990) provided adequate fit to the data. An oblique four-factor model described by Ager and MacLachlan (1998) provided the best fit. Further research is necessary in terms of developing and scoring the instrument as a four-dimensional tool. These results provide further support for the suggestion that the scale is generalizable across population, cultural, and situational variation. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.015

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.015

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 249

EP - 259

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

T2 - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

IS - 2

ER -