Digital imaging and radiographic practise in diagnostic radiography: An overview of current knowledge and practice in Europe.

S. L. McFadden, Thom Roding, Geert De Vries, Martin Benwell, Harmen Bijwaard, Jelle Scheurleer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Recent research has identified the issue of ‘dose creep’ in diagnostic radiography and claims it is due to the introduction of CR and DR technology. More recently radiographers have reported that they do not regularly manipulate exposure factors for different sized patients and rely on pre-set exposures. The aim of the study was to identify any variation in knowledge and radiographic practice across Europe when imaging the chest, abdomen and pelvis using digital imaging.Methods: A random selection of 50 % of educational institutes (n=17) which were affiliated members of the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS) were contacted via their contact details supplied on the EFRS website. Each of these institutes identified appropriate radiographic staff in their clinical network to complete an online survey via SurveyMonkey. Data was collected on exposures used for 3 common x-ray examinations using CR/DR, range of equipment in use, staff educational training and awareness of DRL . Descriptive statistics were performed with the aid of Excel and SPSS version 21. Results: A response rate of 70% was achieved from the affiliated educational members of EFRS and a rate of 55% from the individual hospitals in 12 countries across Europe. Variation was identified in practice when imaging the chest, abdomen and pelvis using both CR and DR digital systems. There is wide variation in radiographer training/education across countries. Conclusion: There is a need for standardisation of education and training including protocols and exposure parameters to ensure that there is continued adherence to the ALARA principle.
LanguageEnglish
Pages137
Number of pages141
JournalRadiography
Volume24
Issue number2
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 13 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Radiography
Pelvis
Abdomen
Thorax
Education
X-Rays
Technology
Equipment and Supplies
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Digital imaging
  • Radiographic practice
  • Europe
  • DRL

Cite this

McFadden, S. L., Roding, T., De Vries, G., Benwell, M., Bijwaard, H., & Scheurleer, J. (Accepted/In press). Digital imaging and radiographic practise in diagnostic radiography: An overview of current knowledge and practice in Europe. Radiography, 24(2), 137.
McFadden, S. L. ; Roding, Thom ; De Vries, Geert ; Benwell, Martin ; Bijwaard, Harmen ; Scheurleer, Jelle. / Digital imaging and radiographic practise in diagnostic radiography: An overview of current knowledge and practice in Europe. In: Radiography. 2017 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 137.
@article{e5add61c755d424d9512891b23a3143b,
title = "Digital imaging and radiographic practise in diagnostic radiography: An overview of current knowledge and practice in Europe.",
abstract = "Introduction: Recent research has identified the issue of ‘dose creep’ in diagnostic radiography and claims it is due to the introduction of CR and DR technology. More recently radiographers have reported that they do not regularly manipulate exposure factors for different sized patients and rely on pre-set exposures. The aim of the study was to identify any variation in knowledge and radiographic practice across Europe when imaging the chest, abdomen and pelvis using digital imaging.Methods: A random selection of 50 {\%} of educational institutes (n=17) which were affiliated members of the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS) were contacted via their contact details supplied on the EFRS website. Each of these institutes identified appropriate radiographic staff in their clinical network to complete an online survey via SurveyMonkey. Data was collected on exposures used for 3 common x-ray examinations using CR/DR, range of equipment in use, staff educational training and awareness of DRL . Descriptive statistics were performed with the aid of Excel and SPSS version 21. Results: A response rate of 70{\%} was achieved from the affiliated educational members of EFRS and a rate of 55{\%} from the individual hospitals in 12 countries across Europe. Variation was identified in practice when imaging the chest, abdomen and pelvis using both CR and DR digital systems. There is wide variation in radiographer training/education across countries. Conclusion: There is a need for standardisation of education and training including protocols and exposure parameters to ensure that there is continued adherence to the ALARA principle.",
keywords = "Digital imaging, Radiographic practice, Europe, DRL",
author = "McFadden, {S. L.} and Thom Roding and {De Vries}, Geert and Martin Benwell and Harmen Bijwaard and Jelle Scheurleer",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "13",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "137",
journal = "Radiography",
issn = "1078-8174",
number = "2",

}

McFadden, SL, Roding, T, De Vries, G, Benwell, M, Bijwaard, H & Scheurleer, J 2017, 'Digital imaging and radiographic practise in diagnostic radiography: An overview of current knowledge and practice in Europe.', Radiography, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 137.

Digital imaging and radiographic practise in diagnostic radiography: An overview of current knowledge and practice in Europe. / McFadden, S. L.; Roding, Thom; De Vries, Geert; Benwell, Martin; Bijwaard, Harmen; Scheurleer, Jelle.

In: Radiography, Vol. 24, No. 2, 13.11.2017, p. 137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Digital imaging and radiographic practise in diagnostic radiography: An overview of current knowledge and practice in Europe.

AU - McFadden, S. L.

AU - Roding, Thom

AU - De Vries, Geert

AU - Benwell, Martin

AU - Bijwaard, Harmen

AU - Scheurleer, Jelle

PY - 2017/11/13

Y1 - 2017/11/13

N2 - Introduction: Recent research has identified the issue of ‘dose creep’ in diagnostic radiography and claims it is due to the introduction of CR and DR technology. More recently radiographers have reported that they do not regularly manipulate exposure factors for different sized patients and rely on pre-set exposures. The aim of the study was to identify any variation in knowledge and radiographic practice across Europe when imaging the chest, abdomen and pelvis using digital imaging.Methods: A random selection of 50 % of educational institutes (n=17) which were affiliated members of the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS) were contacted via their contact details supplied on the EFRS website. Each of these institutes identified appropriate radiographic staff in their clinical network to complete an online survey via SurveyMonkey. Data was collected on exposures used for 3 common x-ray examinations using CR/DR, range of equipment in use, staff educational training and awareness of DRL . Descriptive statistics were performed with the aid of Excel and SPSS version 21. Results: A response rate of 70% was achieved from the affiliated educational members of EFRS and a rate of 55% from the individual hospitals in 12 countries across Europe. Variation was identified in practice when imaging the chest, abdomen and pelvis using both CR and DR digital systems. There is wide variation in radiographer training/education across countries. Conclusion: There is a need for standardisation of education and training including protocols and exposure parameters to ensure that there is continued adherence to the ALARA principle.

AB - Introduction: Recent research has identified the issue of ‘dose creep’ in diagnostic radiography and claims it is due to the introduction of CR and DR technology. More recently radiographers have reported that they do not regularly manipulate exposure factors for different sized patients and rely on pre-set exposures. The aim of the study was to identify any variation in knowledge and radiographic practice across Europe when imaging the chest, abdomen and pelvis using digital imaging.Methods: A random selection of 50 % of educational institutes (n=17) which were affiliated members of the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS) were contacted via their contact details supplied on the EFRS website. Each of these institutes identified appropriate radiographic staff in their clinical network to complete an online survey via SurveyMonkey. Data was collected on exposures used for 3 common x-ray examinations using CR/DR, range of equipment in use, staff educational training and awareness of DRL . Descriptive statistics were performed with the aid of Excel and SPSS version 21. Results: A response rate of 70% was achieved from the affiliated educational members of EFRS and a rate of 55% from the individual hospitals in 12 countries across Europe. Variation was identified in practice when imaging the chest, abdomen and pelvis using both CR and DR digital systems. There is wide variation in radiographer training/education across countries. Conclusion: There is a need for standardisation of education and training including protocols and exposure parameters to ensure that there is continued adherence to the ALARA principle.

KW - Digital imaging

KW - Radiographic practice

KW - Europe

KW - DRL

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 137

JO - Radiography

T2 - Radiography

JF - Radiography

SN - 1078-8174

IS - 2

ER -