Deviations from aspirational target levels and environmental and safety performance:Implications for operations managers acting irresponsibly

Frank Wiengarten, Di Fan, Mark Pagell, Chris Lo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The relationship between sustainable operations and a firm's financial performance has been an ongoing focus of operations management scholars. Previous literature has extensively explored the impact of acting responsibly on financial performance. This article applies the behavioral theory of the firm and prospect theory to assess the much-neglected reverse relationship, exploring whether a firm's relative aspirational financial performance impacts its likelihood of acting irresponsibly. Furthermore, we explore whether operational slack in the form of capacity, productivity, and inventory attenuates a firm's likelihood of acting irresponsibly when its actual financial performance deviates from its aspirational level. We use a matched pair design with privately held manufacturing firms in the United Kingdom who acted irresponsibly matched with similar firms who did not act irresponsibly. While most firms do not act irresponsibly, we find that the further a firm moves (positively or negatively) from its aspirational level of financial performance, the more likely it is to act irresponsibly. The results also indicate that slack generally does not prevent managers from acting irresponsibly, especially when performing relatively well. This study contributes to the sustainable operations literature and provides important theoretical, managerial, and policy implications.

LanguageEnglish
Pages490-516
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Operations Management
Volume65
Issue number6
Early online date9 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Managers
Productivity
Financial performance
Safety performance
Environmental performance
Deviation

Keywords

  • aspiration level
  • behavioral theory of a firm
  • hubris
  • problemistic search
  • sustainability

Cite this

@article{646738540467461688a79c32135cf43a,
title = "Deviations from aspirational target levels and environmental and safety performance:Implications for operations managers acting irresponsibly",
abstract = "The relationship between sustainable operations and a firm's financial performance has been an ongoing focus of operations management scholars. Previous literature has extensively explored the impact of acting responsibly on financial performance. This article applies the behavioral theory of the firm and prospect theory to assess the much-neglected reverse relationship, exploring whether a firm's relative aspirational financial performance impacts its likelihood of acting irresponsibly. Furthermore, we explore whether operational slack in the form of capacity, productivity, and inventory attenuates a firm's likelihood of acting irresponsibly when its actual financial performance deviates from its aspirational level. We use a matched pair design with privately held manufacturing firms in the United Kingdom who acted irresponsibly matched with similar firms who did not act irresponsibly. While most firms do not act irresponsibly, we find that the further a firm moves (positively or negatively) from its aspirational level of financial performance, the more likely it is to act irresponsibly. The results also indicate that slack generally does not prevent managers from acting irresponsibly, especially when performing relatively well. This study contributes to the sustainable operations literature and provides important theoretical, managerial, and policy implications.",
keywords = "aspiration level, behavioral theory of a firm, hubris, problemistic search, sustainability",
author = "Frank Wiengarten and Di Fan and Mark Pagell and Chris Lo",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/joom.1032",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "490--516",
journal = "Journal of Operations Management",
issn = "0272-6963",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

Deviations from aspirational target levels and environmental and safety performance:Implications for operations managers acting irresponsibly. / Wiengarten, Frank; Fan, Di; Pagell, Mark; Lo, Chris.

In: Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 65, No. 6, 01.09.2019, p. 490-516.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deviations from aspirational target levels and environmental and safety performance:Implications for operations managers acting irresponsibly

AU - Wiengarten, Frank

AU - Fan, Di

AU - Pagell, Mark

AU - Lo, Chris

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - The relationship between sustainable operations and a firm's financial performance has been an ongoing focus of operations management scholars. Previous literature has extensively explored the impact of acting responsibly on financial performance. This article applies the behavioral theory of the firm and prospect theory to assess the much-neglected reverse relationship, exploring whether a firm's relative aspirational financial performance impacts its likelihood of acting irresponsibly. Furthermore, we explore whether operational slack in the form of capacity, productivity, and inventory attenuates a firm's likelihood of acting irresponsibly when its actual financial performance deviates from its aspirational level. We use a matched pair design with privately held manufacturing firms in the United Kingdom who acted irresponsibly matched with similar firms who did not act irresponsibly. While most firms do not act irresponsibly, we find that the further a firm moves (positively or negatively) from its aspirational level of financial performance, the more likely it is to act irresponsibly. The results also indicate that slack generally does not prevent managers from acting irresponsibly, especially when performing relatively well. This study contributes to the sustainable operations literature and provides important theoretical, managerial, and policy implications.

AB - The relationship between sustainable operations and a firm's financial performance has been an ongoing focus of operations management scholars. Previous literature has extensively explored the impact of acting responsibly on financial performance. This article applies the behavioral theory of the firm and prospect theory to assess the much-neglected reverse relationship, exploring whether a firm's relative aspirational financial performance impacts its likelihood of acting irresponsibly. Furthermore, we explore whether operational slack in the form of capacity, productivity, and inventory attenuates a firm's likelihood of acting irresponsibly when its actual financial performance deviates from its aspirational level. We use a matched pair design with privately held manufacturing firms in the United Kingdom who acted irresponsibly matched with similar firms who did not act irresponsibly. While most firms do not act irresponsibly, we find that the further a firm moves (positively or negatively) from its aspirational level of financial performance, the more likely it is to act irresponsibly. The results also indicate that slack generally does not prevent managers from acting irresponsibly, especially when performing relatively well. This study contributes to the sustainable operations literature and provides important theoretical, managerial, and policy implications.

KW - aspiration level

KW - behavioral theory of a firm

KW - hubris

KW - problemistic search

KW - sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067390188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/joom.1032

DO - 10.1002/joom.1032

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 490

EP - 516

JO - Journal of Operations Management

T2 - Journal of Operations Management

JF - Journal of Operations Management

SN - 0272-6963

IS - 6

ER -