Development and validation of an inventory to assess conflict in sport teams: the Group Conflict Questionnaire

Kyle Paradis, Albert Carron, Luc Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to develop and validate a conceptually and psychometrically sound conflict questionnaire for sport. The development process involved 3 phases: (a) a qualitative phase, (b) a content and factorial validity phase and (c) a construct validity phase. A total of 50 items were generated and sent to 6 experts to determine content validity. Through this process, 25 items were retained and administered to a sample of athletes (n = 437) to determine factorial validity. Based on these results, a second sample (n = 305) was administered the 14-item version of the Group Conflict Questionnaire along with the Group Environment Questionnaire, the Athlete Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Passion Scale to test convergent, discriminant and known-group difference validity. Cross-validation from both samples via confirmatory factor analysis yielded moderate-to-acceptable model fit, thus supporting factorial validity for the 14-item version. Additionally, initial support for convergent validity and known-group difference validity and partial support for discriminant validity were found. A sport-specific conflict questionnaire is now available for researchers to utilise. Results and research implications are discussed.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1966-1978
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Volume32
Issue number20
Early online date30 Oct 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Dec 2014

Keywords

  • validity
  • group dynamics
  • psychometrics
  • measurement
  • intra-group conflict

Cite this

@article{fecd9777a9414011bd93993d9ef4f336,
title = "Development and validation of an inventory to assess conflict in sport teams: the Group Conflict Questionnaire",
abstract = "The purpose of the study was to develop and validate a conceptually and psychometrically sound conflict questionnaire for sport. The development process involved 3 phases: (a) a qualitative phase, (b) a content and factorial validity phase and (c) a construct validity phase. A total of 50 items were generated and sent to 6 experts to determine content validity. Through this process, 25 items were retained and administered to a sample of athletes (n = 437) to determine factorial validity. Based on these results, a second sample (n = 305) was administered the 14-item version of the Group Conflict Questionnaire along with the Group Environment Questionnaire, the Athlete Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Passion Scale to test convergent, discriminant and known-group difference validity. Cross-validation from both samples via confirmatory factor analysis yielded moderate-to-acceptable model fit, thus supporting factorial validity for the 14-item version. Additionally, initial support for convergent validity and known-group difference validity and partial support for discriminant validity were found. A sport-specific conflict questionnaire is now available for researchers to utilise. Results and research implications are discussed.",
keywords = "validity, group dynamics, psychometrics, measurement, intra-group conflict",
author = "Kyle Paradis and Albert Carron and Luc Martin",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1080/02640414.2014.970220",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1966--1978",
journal = "Journal of Sports Sciences",
issn = "0264-0414",
number = "20",

}

Development and validation of an inventory to assess conflict in sport teams: the Group Conflict Questionnaire. / Paradis, Kyle; Carron, Albert; Martin, Luc.

In: Journal of Sports Sciences, Vol. 32, No. 20, 14.12.2014, p. 1966-1978.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and validation of an inventory to assess conflict in sport teams: the Group Conflict Questionnaire

AU - Paradis, Kyle

AU - Carron, Albert

AU - Martin, Luc

PY - 2014/12/14

Y1 - 2014/12/14

N2 - The purpose of the study was to develop and validate a conceptually and psychometrically sound conflict questionnaire for sport. The development process involved 3 phases: (a) a qualitative phase, (b) a content and factorial validity phase and (c) a construct validity phase. A total of 50 items were generated and sent to 6 experts to determine content validity. Through this process, 25 items were retained and administered to a sample of athletes (n = 437) to determine factorial validity. Based on these results, a second sample (n = 305) was administered the 14-item version of the Group Conflict Questionnaire along with the Group Environment Questionnaire, the Athlete Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Passion Scale to test convergent, discriminant and known-group difference validity. Cross-validation from both samples via confirmatory factor analysis yielded moderate-to-acceptable model fit, thus supporting factorial validity for the 14-item version. Additionally, initial support for convergent validity and known-group difference validity and partial support for discriminant validity were found. A sport-specific conflict questionnaire is now available for researchers to utilise. Results and research implications are discussed.

AB - The purpose of the study was to develop and validate a conceptually and psychometrically sound conflict questionnaire for sport. The development process involved 3 phases: (a) a qualitative phase, (b) a content and factorial validity phase and (c) a construct validity phase. A total of 50 items were generated and sent to 6 experts to determine content validity. Through this process, 25 items were retained and administered to a sample of athletes (n = 437) to determine factorial validity. Based on these results, a second sample (n = 305) was administered the 14-item version of the Group Conflict Questionnaire along with the Group Environment Questionnaire, the Athlete Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Passion Scale to test convergent, discriminant and known-group difference validity. Cross-validation from both samples via confirmatory factor analysis yielded moderate-to-acceptable model fit, thus supporting factorial validity for the 14-item version. Additionally, initial support for convergent validity and known-group difference validity and partial support for discriminant validity were found. A sport-specific conflict questionnaire is now available for researchers to utilise. Results and research implications are discussed.

KW - validity

KW - group dynamics

KW - psychometrics

KW - measurement

KW - intra-group conflict

U2 - 10.1080/02640414.2014.970220

DO - 10.1080/02640414.2014.970220

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 1966

EP - 1978

JO - Journal of Sports Sciences

T2 - Journal of Sports Sciences

JF - Journal of Sports Sciences

SN - 0264-0414

IS - 20

ER -