Developing constitutional principles through firefighting: social security parity in Northern Ireland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The convention of parity of social security provision between Northern Ireland and Great Britain is explored as an example of how the uncodified UK constitution allows hasty, nominally temporary responses to chance events to gain decisive force in a particular field of governance or policy. As Northern Ireland’s politicians debate the future of parity to an unprecedented extent and Scotland looks to the development of a new post-referendum settlement of which, the Westminster parties have promised, greater devolved responsibility for “welfare” will play a part, discussion of the lessons of parity for those who would favour meaningful regional control of social security is timely. The author suggests that the key challenge is finding a settlement that affords economically weaker regions genuine policy autonomy without diminution of living standards.
LanguageEnglish
Pages31-49
JournalJournal of Social Security Law
Volume22
Issue number1
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 6 Nov 2014

Fingerprint

social security
referendum
standard of living
politician
constitution
autonomy
welfare
governance
responsibility
event

Keywords

  • Social security
  • Devolution
  • Northern Ireland
  • Welfare reform

Cite this

@article{c7b4fd8588f0431486ef0f5e07758109,
title = "Developing constitutional principles through firefighting: social security parity in Northern Ireland",
abstract = "The convention of parity of social security provision between Northern Ireland and Great Britain is explored as an example of how the uncodified UK constitution allows hasty, nominally temporary responses to chance events to gain decisive force in a particular field of governance or policy. As Northern Ireland’s politicians debate the future of parity to an unprecedented extent and Scotland looks to the development of a new post-referendum settlement of which, the Westminster parties have promised, greater devolved responsibility for “welfare” will play a part, discussion of the lessons of parity for those who would favour meaningful regional control of social security is timely. The author suggests that the key challenge is finding a settlement that affords economically weaker regions genuine policy autonomy without diminution of living standards.",
keywords = "Social security, Devolution, Northern Ireland, Welfare reform",
author = "Mark Simpson",
note = "Research supervised by Grainne McKeever and Ann Marie Gray",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "31--49",
number = "1",

}

Developing constitutional principles through firefighting: social security parity in Northern Ireland. / Simpson, Mark.

Vol. 22, No. 1, 06.11.2014, p. 31-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing constitutional principles through firefighting: social security parity in Northern Ireland

AU - Simpson, Mark

N1 - Research supervised by Grainne McKeever and Ann Marie Gray

PY - 2014/11/6

Y1 - 2014/11/6

N2 - The convention of parity of social security provision between Northern Ireland and Great Britain is explored as an example of how the uncodified UK constitution allows hasty, nominally temporary responses to chance events to gain decisive force in a particular field of governance or policy. As Northern Ireland’s politicians debate the future of parity to an unprecedented extent and Scotland looks to the development of a new post-referendum settlement of which, the Westminster parties have promised, greater devolved responsibility for “welfare” will play a part, discussion of the lessons of parity for those who would favour meaningful regional control of social security is timely. The author suggests that the key challenge is finding a settlement that affords economically weaker regions genuine policy autonomy without diminution of living standards.

AB - The convention of parity of social security provision between Northern Ireland and Great Britain is explored as an example of how the uncodified UK constitution allows hasty, nominally temporary responses to chance events to gain decisive force in a particular field of governance or policy. As Northern Ireland’s politicians debate the future of parity to an unprecedented extent and Scotland looks to the development of a new post-referendum settlement of which, the Westminster parties have promised, greater devolved responsibility for “welfare” will play a part, discussion of the lessons of parity for those who would favour meaningful regional control of social security is timely. The author suggests that the key challenge is finding a settlement that affords economically weaker regions genuine policy autonomy without diminution of living standards.

KW - Social security

KW - Devolution

KW - Northern Ireland

KW - Welfare reform

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 31

EP - 49

IS - 1

ER -