Developing and testing a theory-driven e-learning intervention to equip healthcare professionals to communicate with parents impacted by parental cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Parents have a desire and need for instructive support from healthcare professionals on how best to communicate a cancer diagnosis with their dependent children. Healthcare professionals lack confidence to initiate and facilitate parent-child communication, reporting the need for training. To address the evident gap, this paper outlines the planning, development and testing phases of an e-learning intervention, using a person-based approach.

Methods: The planning and development phases combined evidence from reviews of qualitative and quantitative literature, an expert group and data generated from primary research of two focus groups with frontline oncology professionals (n=23) to develop the e-learning intervention prototype.

An iterative approach was adopted with 14 ‘think aloud’ interviews for prototype usability testing, resulting in continuous movement between data collection, analysis and modification of the e-learning intervention.

Results: Involving end-users throughout all phases of this process, optimised the intervention development. As a result, a communication framework on how healthcare professionals can initiate these conversations with parents was integrated, alongside role-play videos and original artwork by children expressing their views associated with parental cancer.

During the testing phase, think-aloud interviews identified key navigational difficulties which were modified and resolved. Minor modifications were made to the content and ‘look and feel’ of screen pages.

Conclusions: The systematic and iterative, person-based approach, yielded important and complementary insights to enhance acceptability of the e-learning intervention. Providing a detailed description of the foundations that underpinned the development of this e-learning intervention, promotes transparency in the planning and design process, therefore aids methodological rigour.

Fingerprint

Parents
Learning
Delivery of Health Care
Neoplasms
Communication
Interviews
Focus Groups
Research

Keywords

  • Parental cancer
  • methodology
  • person-based approach
  • intervention development
  • qualitative
  • e-learning
  • think-aloud interviews
  • Qualitative research
  • Person-based approach
  • Methodology
  • E-Learning
  • Intervention development
  • Think-aloud interviews

Cite this

@article{d41a9503ef21464b94901edf821d8367,
title = "Developing and testing a theory-driven e-learning intervention to equip healthcare professionals to communicate with parents impacted by parental cancer",
abstract = "Purpose: Parents have a desire and need for instructive support from healthcare professionals on how best to communicate a cancer diagnosis with their dependent children. Healthcare professionals lack confidence to initiate and facilitate parent-child communication, reporting the need for training. To address the evident gap, this paper outlines the planning, development and testing phases of an e-learning intervention, using a person-based approach. Methods: The planning and development phases combined evidence from reviews of qualitative and quantitative literature, an expert group and data generated from primary research of two focus groups with frontline oncology professionals (n=23) to develop the e-learning intervention prototype. An iterative approach was adopted with 14 ‘think aloud’ interviews for prototype usability testing, resulting in continuous movement between data collection, analysis and modification of the e-learning intervention. Results: Involving end-users throughout all phases of this process, optimised the intervention development. As a result, a communication framework on how healthcare professionals can initiate these conversations with parents was integrated, alongside role-play videos and original artwork by children expressing their views associated with parental cancer. During the testing phase, think-aloud interviews identified key navigational difficulties which were modified and resolved. Minor modifications were made to the content and ‘look and feel’ of screen pages.Conclusions: The systematic and iterative, person-based approach, yielded important and complementary insights to enhance acceptability of the e-learning intervention. Providing a detailed description of the foundations that underpinned the development of this e-learning intervention, promotes transparency in the planning and design process, therefore aids methodological rigour.",
keywords = "Parental cancer, methodology, person-based approach, intervention development, qualitative, e-learning, think-aloud interviews, Qualitative research, Person-based approach, Methodology, E-Learning, Intervention development, Think-aloud interviews",
author = "Cherith Semple and Eilis McCaughan",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejon.2019.05.006",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "126--134",
journal = "European Journal of Oncology Nursing",
issn = "1462-3889",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing and testing a theory-driven e-learning intervention to equip healthcare professionals to communicate with parents impacted by parental cancer

AU - Semple, Cherith

AU - McCaughan, Eilis

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Purpose: Parents have a desire and need for instructive support from healthcare professionals on how best to communicate a cancer diagnosis with their dependent children. Healthcare professionals lack confidence to initiate and facilitate parent-child communication, reporting the need for training. To address the evident gap, this paper outlines the planning, development and testing phases of an e-learning intervention, using a person-based approach. Methods: The planning and development phases combined evidence from reviews of qualitative and quantitative literature, an expert group and data generated from primary research of two focus groups with frontline oncology professionals (n=23) to develop the e-learning intervention prototype. An iterative approach was adopted with 14 ‘think aloud’ interviews for prototype usability testing, resulting in continuous movement between data collection, analysis and modification of the e-learning intervention. Results: Involving end-users throughout all phases of this process, optimised the intervention development. As a result, a communication framework on how healthcare professionals can initiate these conversations with parents was integrated, alongside role-play videos and original artwork by children expressing their views associated with parental cancer. During the testing phase, think-aloud interviews identified key navigational difficulties which were modified and resolved. Minor modifications were made to the content and ‘look and feel’ of screen pages.Conclusions: The systematic and iterative, person-based approach, yielded important and complementary insights to enhance acceptability of the e-learning intervention. Providing a detailed description of the foundations that underpinned the development of this e-learning intervention, promotes transparency in the planning and design process, therefore aids methodological rigour.

AB - Purpose: Parents have a desire and need for instructive support from healthcare professionals on how best to communicate a cancer diagnosis with their dependent children. Healthcare professionals lack confidence to initiate and facilitate parent-child communication, reporting the need for training. To address the evident gap, this paper outlines the planning, development and testing phases of an e-learning intervention, using a person-based approach. Methods: The planning and development phases combined evidence from reviews of qualitative and quantitative literature, an expert group and data generated from primary research of two focus groups with frontline oncology professionals (n=23) to develop the e-learning intervention prototype. An iterative approach was adopted with 14 ‘think aloud’ interviews for prototype usability testing, resulting in continuous movement between data collection, analysis and modification of the e-learning intervention. Results: Involving end-users throughout all phases of this process, optimised the intervention development. As a result, a communication framework on how healthcare professionals can initiate these conversations with parents was integrated, alongside role-play videos and original artwork by children expressing their views associated with parental cancer. During the testing phase, think-aloud interviews identified key navigational difficulties which were modified and resolved. Minor modifications were made to the content and ‘look and feel’ of screen pages.Conclusions: The systematic and iterative, person-based approach, yielded important and complementary insights to enhance acceptability of the e-learning intervention. Providing a detailed description of the foundations that underpinned the development of this e-learning intervention, promotes transparency in the planning and design process, therefore aids methodological rigour.

KW - Parental cancer

KW - methodology

KW - person-based approach

KW - intervention development

KW - qualitative

KW - e-learning

KW - think-aloud interviews

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Person-based approach

KW - Methodology

KW - E-Learning

KW - Intervention development

KW - Think-aloud interviews

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067175734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.05.006

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 126

EP - 134

JO - European Journal of Oncology Nursing

T2 - European Journal of Oncology Nursing

JF - European Journal of Oncology Nursing

SN - 1462-3889

M1 - 41

ER -