Determining the relative contribution of retinal disparity and blur cues to ocular accommodation in Down syndrome

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
80 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) often exhibit hypoaccommodation alongside accurate vergence. This study investigates the sensitivity of the two systems to retinal disparity and blur cues, establishing the relationship between the two in terms of accommodative-convergence to accommodation (AC/A) and convergence-accommodation to convergence (CA/C) ratios. An objective photorefraction system measured accommodation and vergence under binocular conditions and when retinal disparity and blur cues were removed. Participants were aged 6-16 years (DS n = 41, controls n = 76). Measures were obtained from 65.9% of participants with DS and 100% of controls. Accommodative and vergence responses were reduced with the removal of one or both cues in controls (p <0.007). For participants with DS, removal of blur was less detrimental to accommodative responses than removal of disparity; accommodative responses being significantly better when all cues were available or when blur was removed in comparison to when proximity was the only available cue. AC/A ratios were larger and CA/C ratios smaller in participants with DS (p <0.00001). This study demonstrates that retinal disparity is the main driver to both systems in DS and illustrates the diminished influence of retinal blur. High AC/A and low CA/C ratios in combination with disparity-driven responses suggest prioritisation of vergence over accurate accommodation.
Original languageEnglish
Article number39860
Number of pages8
JournalScientific Reports
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 10 Jan 2017

Keywords

  • Down syndrome
  • accommodation
  • convergence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Determining the relative contribution of retinal disparity and blur cues to ocular accommodation in Down syndrome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this