Abstract
| Language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 66-77 |
| Journal | European Human Rights Law Review |
| Volume | 2015 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 16 Dec 2014 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Dignity
- Welfare reform
- Social security
- European Convention on Human Rights
- Claimant activation
Cite this
}
"Designed to reduce people... to complete destitution": human dignity in the active welfare state. / Simpson, Mark.
Vol. 2015, No. 1, 16.12.2014, p. 66-77.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - "Designed to reduce people... to complete destitution": human dignity in the active welfare state
AU - Simpson, Mark
N1 - Research supervised by Grainne McKeever and Ann Marie Gray
PY - 2014/12/16
Y1 - 2014/12/16
N2 - This paper discusses the implications for the right to a life in dignity of the “activation turn” (Kenworthy) in the welfare state, characterised by the requirement that social security claimants be available for and undertake compulsory activities intended to result in finding employment. Failure to comply may result in loss of benefit for up to three years. This paper argues that while activation of claimants is compatible with human rights law, the UK’s sanctions regime may be vulnerable to challenge. The main focus is on whether a regime Webster claims is designed to result in “complete destitution” can be compatible with human dignity. The key focus is on article 3, article 8 and P1-1 ECHR and their relationship to three elements of the protection of human dignity identified by McCrudden: prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment, individual autonomy and satisfaction of essential needs.
AB - This paper discusses the implications for the right to a life in dignity of the “activation turn” (Kenworthy) in the welfare state, characterised by the requirement that social security claimants be available for and undertake compulsory activities intended to result in finding employment. Failure to comply may result in loss of benefit for up to three years. This paper argues that while activation of claimants is compatible with human rights law, the UK’s sanctions regime may be vulnerable to challenge. The main focus is on whether a regime Webster claims is designed to result in “complete destitution” can be compatible with human dignity. The key focus is on article 3, article 8 and P1-1 ECHR and their relationship to three elements of the protection of human dignity identified by McCrudden: prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment, individual autonomy and satisfaction of essential needs.
KW - Dignity
KW - Welfare reform
KW - Social security
KW - European Convention on Human Rights
KW - Claimant activation
M3 - Article
VL - 2015
SP - 66
EP - 77
IS - 1
ER -