"Designed to reduce people... to complete destitution": human dignity in the active welfare state

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper discusses the implications for the right to a life in dignity of the “activation turn” (Kenworthy) in the welfare state, characterised by the requirement that social security claimants be available for and undertake compulsory activities intended to result in finding employment. Failure to comply may result in loss of benefit for up to three years. This paper argues that while activation of claimants is compatible with human rights law, the UK’s sanctions regime may be vulnerable to challenge. The main focus is on whether a regime Webster claims is designed to result in “complete destitution” can be compatible with human dignity. The key focus is on article 3, article 8 and P1-1 ECHR and their relationship to three elements of the protection of human dignity identified by McCrudden: prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment, individual autonomy and satisfaction of essential needs.
LanguageEnglish
Pages66-77
JournalEuropean Human Rights Law Review
Volume2015
Issue number1
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 16 Dec 2014

Fingerprint

human dignity
welfare state
activation
ECHR
social security
sanction
human rights
autonomy
regime
Law

Keywords

  • Dignity
  • Welfare reform
  • Social security
  • European Convention on Human Rights
  • Claimant activation

Cite this

@article{8936438ad88344e3993f3d63b1964e3d,
title = "{"}Designed to reduce people... to complete destitution{"}: human dignity in the active welfare state",
abstract = "This paper discusses the implications for the right to a life in dignity of the “activation turn” (Kenworthy) in the welfare state, characterised by the requirement that social security claimants be available for and undertake compulsory activities intended to result in finding employment. Failure to comply may result in loss of benefit for up to three years. This paper argues that while activation of claimants is compatible with human rights law, the UK’s sanctions regime may be vulnerable to challenge. The main focus is on whether a regime Webster claims is designed to result in “complete destitution” can be compatible with human dignity. The key focus is on article 3, article 8 and P1-1 ECHR and their relationship to three elements of the protection of human dignity identified by McCrudden: prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment, individual autonomy and satisfaction of essential needs.",
keywords = "Dignity, Welfare reform, Social security, European Convention on Human Rights, Claimant activation",
author = "Mark Simpson",
note = "Research supervised by Grainne McKeever and Ann Marie Gray",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "16",
language = "English",
volume = "2015",
pages = "66--77",
number = "1",

}

"Designed to reduce people... to complete destitution": human dignity in the active welfare state. / Simpson, Mark.

Vol. 2015, No. 1, 16.12.2014, p. 66-77.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Designed to reduce people... to complete destitution": human dignity in the active welfare state

AU - Simpson, Mark

N1 - Research supervised by Grainne McKeever and Ann Marie Gray

PY - 2014/12/16

Y1 - 2014/12/16

N2 - This paper discusses the implications for the right to a life in dignity of the “activation turn” (Kenworthy) in the welfare state, characterised by the requirement that social security claimants be available for and undertake compulsory activities intended to result in finding employment. Failure to comply may result in loss of benefit for up to three years. This paper argues that while activation of claimants is compatible with human rights law, the UK’s sanctions regime may be vulnerable to challenge. The main focus is on whether a regime Webster claims is designed to result in “complete destitution” can be compatible with human dignity. The key focus is on article 3, article 8 and P1-1 ECHR and their relationship to three elements of the protection of human dignity identified by McCrudden: prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment, individual autonomy and satisfaction of essential needs.

AB - This paper discusses the implications for the right to a life in dignity of the “activation turn” (Kenworthy) in the welfare state, characterised by the requirement that social security claimants be available for and undertake compulsory activities intended to result in finding employment. Failure to comply may result in loss of benefit for up to three years. This paper argues that while activation of claimants is compatible with human rights law, the UK’s sanctions regime may be vulnerable to challenge. The main focus is on whether a regime Webster claims is designed to result in “complete destitution” can be compatible with human dignity. The key focus is on article 3, article 8 and P1-1 ECHR and their relationship to three elements of the protection of human dignity identified by McCrudden: prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment, individual autonomy and satisfaction of essential needs.

KW - Dignity

KW - Welfare reform

KW - Social security

KW - European Convention on Human Rights

KW - Claimant activation

M3 - Article

VL - 2015

SP - 66

EP - 77

IS - 1

ER -