Abstract
This paper presents clinical testing conducted to evaluate the accuracy of Aingeal, a wireless in-hospital patient monitor, in measuring respiration rate via impedance pneumography. Healthy volunteers were invited to simultaneously wear a CE Marked Aingeal vital signs monitor and a capnograph, the current gold standard in respiration rate measurement. During the test, participants were asked to undergo a series of defined breathing protocols which included normal breathing, paced breathing between 8-23 breaths per minute (bpm) and a recovery period following moderate exercise. Statistical analysis of the data collected shows a mean difference of -0.73, a standard deviation of 1.61, limits of agreement of -3.88 and +2.42 bpm and a P-value of 0.22. This testing demonstrates comparable performance of the Aingeal device in measuring respiration rate with a well-accepted and widely used alternative method. © 2013 IEEE.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Unknown Host Publication |
| Publisher | IEEE |
| Pages | 6711-6715 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 2013 |
| Event | IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Conference - Duration: 1 Jan 2013 → … |
Conference
| Conference | IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Conference |
|---|---|
| Period | 1/01/13 → … |