Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of Quality of Life Scales for Arabic-Speaking Adults: A Systematic Review

Mohammed Al Maqbali, Jackie Gracey, Jane Rankin, Lynn Dunwoody, Eileen Hacker, Ciara Hughes

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
211 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This review aimed to explore the psychometric properties of quality of life (QOL) scales to identify appropriate tools for research and clinical practice in Arabic-speaking adults. A systematic search of the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature® (EBSCO Information Services, Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA), MEDLINE® (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA), EMBASE (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands) and PsycINFO (American Psychological Association, Washington, District of Columbia, USA) databases was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Quality assessment criteria were then utilised to evaluate the psychometric properties of identified QOL scales. A total of 27 studies relating to seven QOL scales were found. While these studies provided sufficient information regarding the scales’ validity and reliability, not all reported translation and cross-cultural adaptation processes. Researchers and clinicians should consider whether the psychometric properties, subscales and characteristics of their chosen QOL scale are suitable for use in their population of interest.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-137
Number of pages13
JournalSultan Qaboos University Medical Journal
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 31 May 2020

Keywords

  • Cross-Cultural Comparison
  • Psychometrics
  • Quality of Life
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Systematic Review
  • Translations
  • Validity and Reliability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of Quality of Life Scales for Arabic-Speaking Adults: A Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this