Critical Theory: understanding the impact language has on workers’ safety and health

Ciaran McAleenan, Philip McAleenan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Knowledge and awareness of safety, health and well-being concepts in construction, and how engineers positively engage with them, result in clearer understanding, contextualised with function and agency, contributing to the facilitation of prevention through design and safe and healthful construction that enhances well-being. Terminologies such as ‘risk assessment’ and ‘risk management’ have long been central to the business and public health discourses as vehicles for measuring the threats and uncertainties that could disrupt or harm either. Epistemologically, the concepts underpinning them are inherently contradictory. Risk assessment measures uncertainty and, being unpredictable, contains the negation of control, whereas applying management to risk, focusing on targets and processes, equates to control, albeit control of uncertainty and the unpredictable. This inherent contradiction is the driver of solutions aimed at preserving the concept rather than embracing its negation. Using critical theory, the authors deconstruct the language of safety, its meanings, interpretations and impact on workers’ safety, health and well-being. In the context of the human ontological project (nature of being), the research contextualises and contrasts the humanising objectives of construction and engineering with the dehumanising language in the safety discourse. It explores the complexity of meanings, developing new understandings of legal and moral obligations.
LanguageEnglish
Pages52-58
JournalProceedings of the ICE - Management, Procurement and Law
Volume172
Issue numberMP2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

Health
Risk assessment
Public health
Terminology
Risk management
Engineers
Workers
Critical theory
Well-being
Health and safety
Uncertainty
Language
Industry
Discourse
Safety
Facilitation
Threat
Moral obligation

Keywords

  • education & training
  • health & safety
  • management

Cite this

@article{5350ba6a63ca41a49398dd8000878ff5,
title = "Critical Theory: understanding the impact language has on workers’ safety and health",
abstract = "Knowledge and awareness of safety, health and well-being concepts in construction, and how engineers positively engage with them, result in clearer understanding, contextualised with function and agency, contributing to the facilitation of prevention through design and safe and healthful construction that enhances well-being. Terminologies such as ‘risk assessment’ and ‘risk management’ have long been central to the business and public health discourses as vehicles for measuring the threats and uncertainties that could disrupt or harm either. Epistemologically, the concepts underpinning them are inherently contradictory. Risk assessment measures uncertainty and, being unpredictable, contains the negation of control, whereas applying management to risk, focusing on targets and processes, equates to control, albeit control of uncertainty and the unpredictable. This inherent contradiction is the driver of solutions aimed at preserving the concept rather than embracing its negation. Using critical theory, the authors deconstruct the language of safety, its meanings, interpretations and impact on workers’ safety, health and well-being. In the context of the human ontological project (nature of being), the research contextualises and contrasts the humanising objectives of construction and engineering with the dehumanising language in the safety discourse. It explores the complexity of meanings, developing new understandings of legal and moral obligations.",
keywords = "education & training, health & safety, management",
author = "Ciaran McAleenan and Philip McAleenan",
note = "Not REF Open Access Compliant",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1680/jmapl.16.00031",
language = "English",
volume = "172",
pages = "52--58",
journal = "Proceedings of the ICE - Management, Procurement and Law",
issn = "1751-4304",
number = "MP2",

}

Critical Theory: understanding the impact language has on workers’ safety and health. / McAleenan, Ciaran; McAleenan, Philip.

In: Proceedings of the ICE - Management, Procurement and Law, Vol. 172, No. MP2, 01.04.2017, p. 52-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical Theory: understanding the impact language has on workers’ safety and health

AU - McAleenan, Ciaran

AU - McAleenan, Philip

N1 - Not REF Open Access Compliant

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Knowledge and awareness of safety, health and well-being concepts in construction, and how engineers positively engage with them, result in clearer understanding, contextualised with function and agency, contributing to the facilitation of prevention through design and safe and healthful construction that enhances well-being. Terminologies such as ‘risk assessment’ and ‘risk management’ have long been central to the business and public health discourses as vehicles for measuring the threats and uncertainties that could disrupt or harm either. Epistemologically, the concepts underpinning them are inherently contradictory. Risk assessment measures uncertainty and, being unpredictable, contains the negation of control, whereas applying management to risk, focusing on targets and processes, equates to control, albeit control of uncertainty and the unpredictable. This inherent contradiction is the driver of solutions aimed at preserving the concept rather than embracing its negation. Using critical theory, the authors deconstruct the language of safety, its meanings, interpretations and impact on workers’ safety, health and well-being. In the context of the human ontological project (nature of being), the research contextualises and contrasts the humanising objectives of construction and engineering with the dehumanising language in the safety discourse. It explores the complexity of meanings, developing new understandings of legal and moral obligations.

AB - Knowledge and awareness of safety, health and well-being concepts in construction, and how engineers positively engage with them, result in clearer understanding, contextualised with function and agency, contributing to the facilitation of prevention through design and safe and healthful construction that enhances well-being. Terminologies such as ‘risk assessment’ and ‘risk management’ have long been central to the business and public health discourses as vehicles for measuring the threats and uncertainties that could disrupt or harm either. Epistemologically, the concepts underpinning them are inherently contradictory. Risk assessment measures uncertainty and, being unpredictable, contains the negation of control, whereas applying management to risk, focusing on targets and processes, equates to control, albeit control of uncertainty and the unpredictable. This inherent contradiction is the driver of solutions aimed at preserving the concept rather than embracing its negation. Using critical theory, the authors deconstruct the language of safety, its meanings, interpretations and impact on workers’ safety, health and well-being. In the context of the human ontological project (nature of being), the research contextualises and contrasts the humanising objectives of construction and engineering with the dehumanising language in the safety discourse. It explores the complexity of meanings, developing new understandings of legal and moral obligations.

KW - education & training

KW - health & safety

KW - management

U2 - 10.1680/jmapl.16.00031

DO - 10.1680/jmapl.16.00031

M3 - Article

VL - 172

SP - 52

EP - 58

JO - Proceedings of the ICE - Management, Procurement and Law

T2 - Proceedings of the ICE - Management, Procurement and Law

JF - Proceedings of the ICE - Management, Procurement and Law

SN - 1751-4304

IS - MP2

ER -