Cooking the Fudge: Constructive Ambiguity and the Implementation of the Northern Ireland Agreement, 1998–2007

David Mitchell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article examines the role of ‘constructive ambiguity’ in the 1998 Belfast Agreement and in its implementation, and demonstrates how it offers a particularly illuminating lens for analysing the persistence and then conclusion of political instability during the years 1998–2007. It begins with a description of what constructive ambiguity is and how it works. After outlining how constructive ambiguity featured in the Agreement, it then explores the manner in which the main political parties fashioned constructively ambiguous implementation strategies in response to the ambiguities of the post‐Agreement context. The conclusion discusses the legacy of constructive ambiguity in Northern Ireland, noting how it has aided political progress whilst being unhelpful to the improvement of inter‐communal relationships.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages321-336
    JournalIrish Political Studies
    Volume24
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2009

    Fingerprint

    persistence

    Cite this

    @article{27254974d72b46c79f0753e38ac01315,
    title = "Cooking the Fudge: Constructive Ambiguity and the Implementation of the Northern Ireland Agreement, 1998–2007",
    abstract = "This article examines the role of ‘constructive ambiguity’ in the 1998 Belfast Agreement and in its implementation, and demonstrates how it offers a particularly illuminating lens for analysing the persistence and then conclusion of political instability during the years 1998–2007. It begins with a description of what constructive ambiguity is and how it works. After outlining how constructive ambiguity featured in the Agreement, it then explores the manner in which the main political parties fashioned constructively ambiguous implementation strategies in response to the ambiguities of the post‐Agreement context. The conclusion discusses the legacy of constructive ambiguity in Northern Ireland, noting how it has aided political progress whilst being unhelpful to the improvement of inter‐communal relationships.",
    author = "David Mitchell",
    year = "2009",
    month = "9",
    day = "1",
    language = "English",
    volume = "24",
    pages = "321--336",
    journal = "Irish Political Studies",
    issn = "0790-7184",
    number = "3",

    }

    Cooking the Fudge: Constructive Ambiguity and the Implementation of the Northern Ireland Agreement, 1998–2007. / Mitchell, David.

    In: Irish Political Studies, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.09.2009, p. 321-336.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Cooking the Fudge: Constructive Ambiguity and the Implementation of the Northern Ireland Agreement, 1998–2007

    AU - Mitchell, David

    PY - 2009/9/1

    Y1 - 2009/9/1

    N2 - This article examines the role of ‘constructive ambiguity’ in the 1998 Belfast Agreement and in its implementation, and demonstrates how it offers a particularly illuminating lens for analysing the persistence and then conclusion of political instability during the years 1998–2007. It begins with a description of what constructive ambiguity is and how it works. After outlining how constructive ambiguity featured in the Agreement, it then explores the manner in which the main political parties fashioned constructively ambiguous implementation strategies in response to the ambiguities of the post‐Agreement context. The conclusion discusses the legacy of constructive ambiguity in Northern Ireland, noting how it has aided political progress whilst being unhelpful to the improvement of inter‐communal relationships.

    AB - This article examines the role of ‘constructive ambiguity’ in the 1998 Belfast Agreement and in its implementation, and demonstrates how it offers a particularly illuminating lens for analysing the persistence and then conclusion of political instability during the years 1998–2007. It begins with a description of what constructive ambiguity is and how it works. After outlining how constructive ambiguity featured in the Agreement, it then explores the manner in which the main political parties fashioned constructively ambiguous implementation strategies in response to the ambiguities of the post‐Agreement context. The conclusion discusses the legacy of constructive ambiguity in Northern Ireland, noting how it has aided political progress whilst being unhelpful to the improvement of inter‐communal relationships.

    M3 - Article

    VL - 24

    SP - 321

    EP - 336

    JO - Irish Political Studies

    T2 - Irish Political Studies

    JF - Irish Political Studies

    SN - 0790-7184

    IS - 3

    ER -