Contemporary multidisciplinary approaches to coastal classification and environmental risk analysis

Andrew Cooper, S McLaughlin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Coastal classification or typology based on multidisciplinary data and multivariate analysis has recently emerged as a tool in coastal management. In this paper, eighteen published accounts of coastal classification procedures are reviewed in order to determine the reasons for such an increase, the variability between different approaches and the utility of each approach. The increase in use of such approaches to coastal classification may be linked to technological advances and widespread use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The main differences identified between the indices are in terms of scale of application, variables included, mode of analysis, mode of presentation and the nature of the risks being assessed. While many authors drew attention to limitations imposed by lack of availability of data, in general it was concluded that few indices adequately considered the physical basis for interaction between variables used in the classification procedure. In particular, while most indices recognise the need for socio-economic data, few were able to adequately incorporate such information. Those indices with the highest utility in risk assessment are considered to be those in which (a) the nature of potential perturbation and (b) the issues of management concern were clearly defined. Those in which neither is adequately defined are likely to be of use mainly as databases. A potential stepwise approach to development of specific coastal classification indices is outlined in which user needs and interrelationships between variables are examined in the planning stage. We recommend development of a GIS-based hierarchy of coastal classifications on varying spatial scales in which resolution may be adapted and variables combined differently according to specific aspects of management concern at different spatial management levels.
LanguageEnglish
Pages512-524
JournalJournal of Coastal Research
Volume14
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1998

Fingerprint

environmental risk
coastal zone management
multivariate analysis
typology
risk analysis
risk assessment
perturbation
index

Keywords

  • coastal classification
  • typology
  • GIS
  • coastal management
  • vulnerability/sensitivity

Cite this

@article{78f324a1256e4c8b829965b228f8fbbb,
title = "Contemporary multidisciplinary approaches to coastal classification and environmental risk analysis",
abstract = "Coastal classification or typology based on multidisciplinary data and multivariate analysis has recently emerged as a tool in coastal management. In this paper, eighteen published accounts of coastal classification procedures are reviewed in order to determine the reasons for such an increase, the variability between different approaches and the utility of each approach. The increase in use of such approaches to coastal classification may be linked to technological advances and widespread use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The main differences identified between the indices are in terms of scale of application, variables included, mode of analysis, mode of presentation and the nature of the risks being assessed. While many authors drew attention to limitations imposed by lack of availability of data, in general it was concluded that few indices adequately considered the physical basis for interaction between variables used in the classification procedure. In particular, while most indices recognise the need for socio-economic data, few were able to adequately incorporate such information. Those indices with the highest utility in risk assessment are considered to be those in which (a) the nature of potential perturbation and (b) the issues of management concern were clearly defined. Those in which neither is adequately defined are likely to be of use mainly as databases. A potential stepwise approach to development of specific coastal classification indices is outlined in which user needs and interrelationships between variables are examined in the planning stage. We recommend development of a GIS-based hierarchy of coastal classifications on varying spatial scales in which resolution may be adapted and variables combined differently according to specific aspects of management concern at different spatial management levels.",
keywords = "coastal classification, typology, GIS, coastal management, vulnerability/sensitivity",
author = "Andrew Cooper and S McLaughlin",
year = "1998",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "512--524",
journal = "Journal of Coastal Research",
issn = "0749-0208",
number = "2",

}

Contemporary multidisciplinary approaches to coastal classification and environmental risk analysis. / Cooper, Andrew; McLaughlin, S.

In: Journal of Coastal Research, Vol. 14, No. 2, 1998, p. 512-524.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contemporary multidisciplinary approaches to coastal classification and environmental risk analysis

AU - Cooper, Andrew

AU - McLaughlin, S

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Coastal classification or typology based on multidisciplinary data and multivariate analysis has recently emerged as a tool in coastal management. In this paper, eighteen published accounts of coastal classification procedures are reviewed in order to determine the reasons for such an increase, the variability between different approaches and the utility of each approach. The increase in use of such approaches to coastal classification may be linked to technological advances and widespread use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The main differences identified between the indices are in terms of scale of application, variables included, mode of analysis, mode of presentation and the nature of the risks being assessed. While many authors drew attention to limitations imposed by lack of availability of data, in general it was concluded that few indices adequately considered the physical basis for interaction between variables used in the classification procedure. In particular, while most indices recognise the need for socio-economic data, few were able to adequately incorporate such information. Those indices with the highest utility in risk assessment are considered to be those in which (a) the nature of potential perturbation and (b) the issues of management concern were clearly defined. Those in which neither is adequately defined are likely to be of use mainly as databases. A potential stepwise approach to development of specific coastal classification indices is outlined in which user needs and interrelationships between variables are examined in the planning stage. We recommend development of a GIS-based hierarchy of coastal classifications on varying spatial scales in which resolution may be adapted and variables combined differently according to specific aspects of management concern at different spatial management levels.

AB - Coastal classification or typology based on multidisciplinary data and multivariate analysis has recently emerged as a tool in coastal management. In this paper, eighteen published accounts of coastal classification procedures are reviewed in order to determine the reasons for such an increase, the variability between different approaches and the utility of each approach. The increase in use of such approaches to coastal classification may be linked to technological advances and widespread use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The main differences identified between the indices are in terms of scale of application, variables included, mode of analysis, mode of presentation and the nature of the risks being assessed. While many authors drew attention to limitations imposed by lack of availability of data, in general it was concluded that few indices adequately considered the physical basis for interaction between variables used in the classification procedure. In particular, while most indices recognise the need for socio-economic data, few were able to adequately incorporate such information. Those indices with the highest utility in risk assessment are considered to be those in which (a) the nature of potential perturbation and (b) the issues of management concern were clearly defined. Those in which neither is adequately defined are likely to be of use mainly as databases. A potential stepwise approach to development of specific coastal classification indices is outlined in which user needs and interrelationships between variables are examined in the planning stage. We recommend development of a GIS-based hierarchy of coastal classifications on varying spatial scales in which resolution may be adapted and variables combined differently according to specific aspects of management concern at different spatial management levels.

KW - coastal classification

KW - typology

KW - GIS

KW - coastal management

KW - vulnerability/sensitivity

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 512

EP - 524

JO - Journal of Coastal Research

T2 - Journal of Coastal Research

JF - Journal of Coastal Research

SN - 0749-0208

IS - 2

ER -