Consumer Regulation Strategies: Attenuating the Effect of Consumer References in a Voting Context

Jodie Whelan, Miranda R Goode, June Cotte, Matthew Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Consumption cues (e.g., brands, money, and advertisements) can have powerful effects on cognition, perception, and behavior, yet how people regulate responses to such cues is not well understood. This is surprising given that consumption cues are increasingly present in nontraditional consumer contexts, such as healthcare, education, and politics. This research develops a measure of two types of consumer regulation strategies, cue‐based and budget‐based (studies 1–4), and demonstrates that these strategies influence how people respond to consumption cues in a political context (study 5). Specifically, in a study involving the 2012 American Presidential Election, priming survey participants as consumers (versus citizens) influenced both voting intentions and self‐reported voting behavior, and the newly developed consumer regulation scale was instrumental in detecting this effect. These findings suggest there may be merit in the escalating debate and concern over referring to voters as consumers.
LanguageEnglish
Pages899-916
JournalPsychology and Marketing
Volume33
Issue number11
Early online date12 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Oct 2016

Fingerprint

Politics
Cues
Budgets
Cognition
Voting
Delivery of Health Care
Education
Research

Cite this

Whelan, Jodie ; Goode, Miranda R ; Cotte, June ; Thompson, Matthew. / Consumer Regulation Strategies: Attenuating the Effect of Consumer References in a Voting Context. In: Psychology and Marketing. 2016 ; Vol. 33, No. 11. pp. 899-916.
@article{a32ca162e64542fe8c94481e57eb4c64,
title = "Consumer Regulation Strategies: Attenuating the Effect of Consumer References in a Voting Context",
abstract = "Consumption cues (e.g., brands, money, and advertisements) can have powerful effects on cognition, perception, and behavior, yet how people regulate responses to such cues is not well understood. This is surprising given that consumption cues are increasingly present in nontraditional consumer contexts, such as healthcare, education, and politics. This research develops a measure of two types of consumer regulation strategies, cue‐based and budget‐based (studies 1–4), and demonstrates that these strategies influence how people respond to consumption cues in a political context (study 5). Specifically, in a study involving the 2012 American Presidential Election, priming survey participants as consumers (versus citizens) influenced both voting intentions and self‐reported voting behavior, and the newly developed consumer regulation scale was instrumental in detecting this effect. These findings suggest there may be merit in the escalating debate and concern over referring to voters as consumers.",
author = "Jodie Whelan and Goode, {Miranda R} and June Cotte and Matthew Thompson",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1002/mar.20927",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "899--916",
journal = "Psychology and Marketing",
issn = "0742-6046",
number = "11",

}

Consumer Regulation Strategies: Attenuating the Effect of Consumer References in a Voting Context. / Whelan, Jodie; Goode, Miranda R; Cotte, June; Thompson, Matthew.

In: Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 33, No. 11, 12.10.2016, p. 899-916.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consumer Regulation Strategies: Attenuating the Effect of Consumer References in a Voting Context

AU - Whelan, Jodie

AU - Goode, Miranda R

AU - Cotte, June

AU - Thompson, Matthew

PY - 2016/10/12

Y1 - 2016/10/12

N2 - Consumption cues (e.g., brands, money, and advertisements) can have powerful effects on cognition, perception, and behavior, yet how people regulate responses to such cues is not well understood. This is surprising given that consumption cues are increasingly present in nontraditional consumer contexts, such as healthcare, education, and politics. This research develops a measure of two types of consumer regulation strategies, cue‐based and budget‐based (studies 1–4), and demonstrates that these strategies influence how people respond to consumption cues in a political context (study 5). Specifically, in a study involving the 2012 American Presidential Election, priming survey participants as consumers (versus citizens) influenced both voting intentions and self‐reported voting behavior, and the newly developed consumer regulation scale was instrumental in detecting this effect. These findings suggest there may be merit in the escalating debate and concern over referring to voters as consumers.

AB - Consumption cues (e.g., brands, money, and advertisements) can have powerful effects on cognition, perception, and behavior, yet how people regulate responses to such cues is not well understood. This is surprising given that consumption cues are increasingly present in nontraditional consumer contexts, such as healthcare, education, and politics. This research develops a measure of two types of consumer regulation strategies, cue‐based and budget‐based (studies 1–4), and demonstrates that these strategies influence how people respond to consumption cues in a political context (study 5). Specifically, in a study involving the 2012 American Presidential Election, priming survey participants as consumers (versus citizens) influenced both voting intentions and self‐reported voting behavior, and the newly developed consumer regulation scale was instrumental in detecting this effect. These findings suggest there may be merit in the escalating debate and concern over referring to voters as consumers.

U2 - 10.1002/mar.20927

DO - 10.1002/mar.20927

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 899

EP - 916

JO - Psychology and Marketing

T2 - Psychology and Marketing

JF - Psychology and Marketing

SN - 0742-6046

IS - 11

ER -