Abstract
To transform our food system to ensure that our diets are simultaneously healthy and sustainable, it is important to ensure that consumer demand and preferences support increased production and availability of sustainable and nutritious foods (the ‘pull’ side of the food system). To facilitate this, consumers need to be provided with information on the nutritional content and environmental impact of foods and meals. The aim of this research was to understand consumer attitudes towards a combined nutrition and sustainability index applied to food labelling and to nutrition and sustainability labelling of foods. Five focus groups were conducted, with 43 consumer participants, which were used to inform the design of interview protocols with 20 consumer participants regarding label design. Participants were selected to represent a mix of gender, age and socio-economic status within UK samples. Thematic analysis of the results suggested that, although participants broadly supported improved nutrition and sustainability of their food choices, nutrition was prioritised over sustainability (potentially reflecting perceptions of personal and immediate impacts on consumer health, and at the same time indirect, systemic and more remote impacts on the environment associated with food choices). Animal welfare was considered a sustainability issue associated with production. For some less affluent consumers, cost represented a more important determinant of food choices. The use of the combined index was appreciated by participants, but additional information about how the nutrition and environmental impact scores contribute to the combined score, and transparency regarding these calculations, would be needed if the label is to be trusted and understood. It was concluded that consumers value the ability to assess nutrition and the environmental impact of foods and meals using the labels provided, if the contributory components of the combined index are made available within the public domain to ensure transparency regarding how these were calculated. The impact of the index on actual food choices (e.g., when combined with policy measures such as taxation and subsidy policy levers) requires further analysis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e70139 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-19 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | International Journal of Consumer Studies |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Early online date | 12 Nov 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 30 Nov 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 The Author(s). International Journal of Consumer Studies published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.Funding
The research was funded by the BBSRC Award number BB/W017962/1 and UK Research and Innovation.
| Funder number |
|---|
| BB/W017962/1 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- consumer decisions
- focus groups
- food
- interviews
- nutrition labelling
- sustainability labelling
- UK
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Consumer attitudes to combined sustainability and nutrition labelling of foods: an exploratory study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver