Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research

Sinead Keeney, Felicity Hasson, Hugh McKenna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to provide insight into the Delphi technique by outlining our personal experiences during its use over a 10-year period in a variety of applications. As a means of achieving consensus on an issue, the Delphi research method has become widely used in healthcare research generally and nursing research in particular. The literature on this technique is expanding, mainly addressing what it is and how it should be used. However, there is still much confusion and uncertainty surrounding it, particularly about issues such as modifications, consensus, anonymity, definition of experts, how `experts' are selected and how non-respondents are pursued. This issues that arise when planning and carrying out a Delphi study include the definition of consensus; the issue of anonymity vs. quasi-anonymity for participants; how to estimate the time needed to collect the data, analyse each `round', feed back results to participants, and gain their responses to this feedback; how to define and select the `experts' who will be asked to participate; how to enhance response rates; and how many `rounds' to conduct. Many challenges and questions are raised when using the Delphi technique, but there is no doubt that it is an important method for achieving consensus on issues where none previously existed. Researchers need to adapt the method to suit their particular study.
LanguageEnglish
Pages205-212
JournalJournal of Advanced Nursing
Volume53
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2006

Fingerprint

Delphi Technique
Nursing Research
Health Services Research
Uncertainty
Research Personnel
Research

Cite this

@article{dbf4a68e6312437c94fc2e675b5d04a1,
title = "Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research",
abstract = "The aim of this paper was to provide insight into the Delphi technique by outlining our personal experiences during its use over a 10-year period in a variety of applications. As a means of achieving consensus on an issue, the Delphi research method has become widely used in healthcare research generally and nursing research in particular. The literature on this technique is expanding, mainly addressing what it is and how it should be used. However, there is still much confusion and uncertainty surrounding it, particularly about issues such as modifications, consensus, anonymity, definition of experts, how `experts' are selected and how non-respondents are pursued. This issues that arise when planning and carrying out a Delphi study include the definition of consensus; the issue of anonymity vs. quasi-anonymity for participants; how to estimate the time needed to collect the data, analyse each `round', feed back results to participants, and gain their responses to this feedback; how to define and select the `experts' who will be asked to participate; how to enhance response rates; and how many `rounds' to conduct. Many challenges and questions are raised when using the Delphi technique, but there is no doubt that it is an important method for achieving consensus on issues where none previously existed. Researchers need to adapt the method to suit their particular study.",
author = "Sinead Keeney and Felicity Hasson and Hugh McKenna",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03399.x",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "205--212",
journal = "Journal of Advanced Nursing",
issn = "0309-2402",
number = "2",

}

Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. / Keeney, Sinead; Hasson, Felicity; McKenna, Hugh.

In: Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 53, No. 2, 01.2006, p. 205-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research

AU - Keeney, Sinead

AU - Hasson, Felicity

AU - McKenna, Hugh

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - The aim of this paper was to provide insight into the Delphi technique by outlining our personal experiences during its use over a 10-year period in a variety of applications. As a means of achieving consensus on an issue, the Delphi research method has become widely used in healthcare research generally and nursing research in particular. The literature on this technique is expanding, mainly addressing what it is and how it should be used. However, there is still much confusion and uncertainty surrounding it, particularly about issues such as modifications, consensus, anonymity, definition of experts, how `experts' are selected and how non-respondents are pursued. This issues that arise when planning and carrying out a Delphi study include the definition of consensus; the issue of anonymity vs. quasi-anonymity for participants; how to estimate the time needed to collect the data, analyse each `round', feed back results to participants, and gain their responses to this feedback; how to define and select the `experts' who will be asked to participate; how to enhance response rates; and how many `rounds' to conduct. Many challenges and questions are raised when using the Delphi technique, but there is no doubt that it is an important method for achieving consensus on issues where none previously existed. Researchers need to adapt the method to suit their particular study.

AB - The aim of this paper was to provide insight into the Delphi technique by outlining our personal experiences during its use over a 10-year period in a variety of applications. As a means of achieving consensus on an issue, the Delphi research method has become widely used in healthcare research generally and nursing research in particular. The literature on this technique is expanding, mainly addressing what it is and how it should be used. However, there is still much confusion and uncertainty surrounding it, particularly about issues such as modifications, consensus, anonymity, definition of experts, how `experts' are selected and how non-respondents are pursued. This issues that arise when planning and carrying out a Delphi study include the definition of consensus; the issue of anonymity vs. quasi-anonymity for participants; how to estimate the time needed to collect the data, analyse each `round', feed back results to participants, and gain their responses to this feedback; how to define and select the `experts' who will be asked to participate; how to enhance response rates; and how many `rounds' to conduct. Many challenges and questions are raised when using the Delphi technique, but there is no doubt that it is an important method for achieving consensus on issues where none previously existed. Researchers need to adapt the method to suit their particular study.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03399.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03399.x

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 205

EP - 212

JO - Journal of Advanced Nursing

T2 - Journal of Advanced Nursing

JF - Journal of Advanced Nursing

SN - 0309-2402

IS - 2

ER -