Abstract
Introduction: The creation of person-centred cultures in health care settings is understood as a pre requisite to the provision of person-centred practice. Such cultures need systematic facilitation by health care leaders. While there are few empirically informed theoretical models for person-centred leadership and many organisations internationally, educate leaders in how to transform cultures to become more person-centred, there is lack of consensus on how person-centred leadership can be developed and no high quality, multi-centre evaluations of their effectiveness or impact. Before such evaluations can be undertaken an agreed curriculum is necessary. Only by having this can the fidelity of a leadership programme, subject to evaluation, be maintained.
Methods: This study sought to gain international expert consensus on a curriculum for person-centred leadership using a modified Delphi method. Delphi studies employ anonymous and confidential survey methods to ensure expert consensus can be achieved without the interference of influential voices or group coalitions. They typically include two or more rounds with controlled feedback between rounds. We developed curriculum components by undertaking a literature review to identify programmes and theoretical models for person-centred leadership alongside a mapping of current person-centred leadership programmes being delivered by members of an international community of practice committed to the development of person-centred practice. We recruited experts using snowball recruitment. In round 1 we focused on seeking consensus on 16 curriculum components and 6 pedagogical delivery principles and offered the opportunity to comment on the phrasing or clarity of any components or propose additional components.
Results: Round 1 resulted in consensus of ≥70% for all components. All bar one had consensus of ≥80%. In round 2 consensus was achieved for all components (≥80% and a mode of 5).
Discussion: Using a modified Delphi study approach we have developed an internationally critiqued curriculum framework for person- centred leadership programmes, specific enough to ensure the fidelity of future programme delivery whilst providing sufficient flexibility for appropriate cultural modification within any complex intervention evaluation study. Research is now needed to evaluate the impact of engagement with this curriculum on healthcare leaders’ self-views; enacted leadership behaviours and practices; health care cultures and other relevant patient and staff outcomes.
Methods: This study sought to gain international expert consensus on a curriculum for person-centred leadership using a modified Delphi method. Delphi studies employ anonymous and confidential survey methods to ensure expert consensus can be achieved without the interference of influential voices or group coalitions. They typically include two or more rounds with controlled feedback between rounds. We developed curriculum components by undertaking a literature review to identify programmes and theoretical models for person-centred leadership alongside a mapping of current person-centred leadership programmes being delivered by members of an international community of practice committed to the development of person-centred practice. We recruited experts using snowball recruitment. In round 1 we focused on seeking consensus on 16 curriculum components and 6 pedagogical delivery principles and offered the opportunity to comment on the phrasing or clarity of any components or propose additional components.
Results: Round 1 resulted in consensus of ≥70% for all components. All bar one had consensus of ≥80%. In round 2 consensus was achieved for all components (≥80% and a mode of 5).
Discussion: Using a modified Delphi study approach we have developed an internationally critiqued curriculum framework for person- centred leadership programmes, specific enough to ensure the fidelity of future programme delivery whilst providing sufficient flexibility for appropriate cultural modification within any complex intervention evaluation study. Research is now needed to evaluate the impact of engagement with this curriculum on healthcare leaders’ self-views; enacted leadership behaviours and practices; health care cultures and other relevant patient and staff outcomes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 1866482 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-12 |
| Journal | Frontiers in Health Services |
| Volume | 6 |
| Early online date | 30 Jun 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published online - 30 Jun 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 Baldie, Cardiff, Sanders, Cope, Hølge-Hazelton, Kjerholt and McCance.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- curriculum
- education
- expert consensus
- leadership
- person-centred
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Consensus on curriculum design for a person-centred leadership learning programme – a Delphi study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver