Conceptualising dignity in the context of social security: bottom-up and top-down perspectives

Ruth Patrick, Mark Simpson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Dignity and social security have been closely associated since at least the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, but there is a lack of clarity around what dignity means in this context. This article explores how two key stakeholders—out-of-work benefit recipients and policymakers—understand dignity in the context of social security, drawing on qualitative research with each group. The evidence presented notes a relative absence of direct references to dignity among policymakers, although related issues are nonetheless discussed, whereas benefit recipients commonly articulate experiences of undignified treatment and the negative impact this has on their lives. This article's exploration of dignity is of particular relevance to Scotland, where recent framework legislation includes the principle that their security system should be underpinned by “respect for the dignity of individuals.” The authors propose that a social security system that protects dignity must take account of distributional, relational, and intrinsic aspects of dignity—providing sufficient income, treating users with respect, and avoiding interventions or discourses that are disrespectful and dehumanizing. Further, the authors question whether it is possible for dignity to enjoy meaningful protection within highly disciplinary conditional welfare regimes.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1-16
Number of pages16
JournalSocial Policy and Administration
Early online date13 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

social security
respect
recipient
human rights
qualitative research
stakeholder
welfare
legislation
income
discourse
lack
evidence
experience
Group

Keywords

  • social security
  • Welfare state
  • dignity
  • Conditionality
  • Devolution
  • Scotland
  • conditionality
  • welfare

Cite this

@article{1a4cbed250c54860924c34bb5053eb45,
title = "Conceptualising dignity in the context of social security: bottom-up and top-down perspectives",
abstract = "Dignity and social security have been closely associated since at least the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, but there is a lack of clarity around what dignity means in this context. This article explores how two key stakeholders—out-of-work benefit recipients and policymakers—understand dignity in the context of social security, drawing on qualitative research with each group. The evidence presented notes a relative absence of direct references to dignity among policymakers, although related issues are nonetheless discussed, whereas benefit recipients commonly articulate experiences of undignified treatment and the negative impact this has on their lives. This article's exploration of dignity is of particular relevance to Scotland, where recent framework legislation includes the principle that their security system should be underpinned by “respect for the dignity of individuals.” The authors propose that a social security system that protects dignity must take account of distributional, relational, and intrinsic aspects of dignity—providing sufficient income, treating users with respect, and avoiding interventions or discourses that are disrespectful and dehumanizing. Further, the authors question whether it is possible for dignity to enjoy meaningful protection within highly disciplinary conditional welfare regimes.",
keywords = "social security, Welfare state, dignity, Conditionality, Devolution, Scotland, conditionality, welfare",
author = "Ruth Patrick and Mark Simpson",
note = "Two manuscripts have been uploaded one is the submitted version and one is the pre-copied edited version. The original one has been closed.",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1111/spol.12528",
language = "English",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Social Policy and Administration",
issn = "0144-5596",

}

Conceptualising dignity in the context of social security: bottom-up and top-down perspectives. / Patrick, Ruth; Simpson, Mark.

In: Social Policy and Administration, 13.08.2019, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptualising dignity in the context of social security: bottom-up and top-down perspectives

AU - Patrick, Ruth

AU - Simpson, Mark

N1 - Two manuscripts have been uploaded one is the submitted version and one is the pre-copied edited version. The original one has been closed.

PY - 2019/8/13

Y1 - 2019/8/13

N2 - Dignity and social security have been closely associated since at least the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, but there is a lack of clarity around what dignity means in this context. This article explores how two key stakeholders—out-of-work benefit recipients and policymakers—understand dignity in the context of social security, drawing on qualitative research with each group. The evidence presented notes a relative absence of direct references to dignity among policymakers, although related issues are nonetheless discussed, whereas benefit recipients commonly articulate experiences of undignified treatment and the negative impact this has on their lives. This article's exploration of dignity is of particular relevance to Scotland, where recent framework legislation includes the principle that their security system should be underpinned by “respect for the dignity of individuals.” The authors propose that a social security system that protects dignity must take account of distributional, relational, and intrinsic aspects of dignity—providing sufficient income, treating users with respect, and avoiding interventions or discourses that are disrespectful and dehumanizing. Further, the authors question whether it is possible for dignity to enjoy meaningful protection within highly disciplinary conditional welfare regimes.

AB - Dignity and social security have been closely associated since at least the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, but there is a lack of clarity around what dignity means in this context. This article explores how two key stakeholders—out-of-work benefit recipients and policymakers—understand dignity in the context of social security, drawing on qualitative research with each group. The evidence presented notes a relative absence of direct references to dignity among policymakers, although related issues are nonetheless discussed, whereas benefit recipients commonly articulate experiences of undignified treatment and the negative impact this has on their lives. This article's exploration of dignity is of particular relevance to Scotland, where recent framework legislation includes the principle that their security system should be underpinned by “respect for the dignity of individuals.” The authors propose that a social security system that protects dignity must take account of distributional, relational, and intrinsic aspects of dignity—providing sufficient income, treating users with respect, and avoiding interventions or discourses that are disrespectful and dehumanizing. Further, the authors question whether it is possible for dignity to enjoy meaningful protection within highly disciplinary conditional welfare regimes.

KW - social security

KW - Welfare state

KW - dignity

KW - Conditionality

KW - Devolution

KW - Scotland

KW - conditionality

KW - welfare

UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/spol.12528

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070767477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/spol.12528

DO - 10.1111/spol.12528

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Social Policy and Administration

T2 - Social Policy and Administration

JF - Social Policy and Administration

SN - 0144-5596

ER -