Comparison of visual assessment tests in multiply handicapped children.

R T Mackie, D L McCulloch, Kathryn Saunders, J Ballantyne, R E Day, M S Bradnam, G N Dutton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aims of this study were to compare acuity estimates achieved with visual evoked potential (VEP) and acuity card techniques and to examine the success rates of each test in a group of multiply handicapped children. Subjects were 52 children (3-183 months) with multiple handicaps associated with prematurity (n = 17), congenital anomalies (n = 16), hypoxic insult (n = 10) and other disorders (n = 9). Success rates for completing the tests were: VEP 88% and acuity cards 85% (Keeler or Cardiff). The acuity card tests were less likely to be successfully completed in the severely disabled (p <0.05) and in those children with nystagmus (p <0.05). When both acuity cards were successful, results agreed to within +/- 1.75 octaves. Acuity card thresholds were significantly correlated with VEP thresholds (p <0.02), but thresholds achieved with VEPs were better in children with poor vision.
LanguageEnglish
Pages136-41
JournalEye (London, England)
Volume9 ( Pt
Publication statusPublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Visual Evoked Potentials
Disabled Children

Cite this

Mackie, R. T., McCulloch, D. L., Saunders, K., Ballantyne, J., Day, R. E., Bradnam, M. S., & Dutton, G. N. (1995). Comparison of visual assessment tests in multiply handicapped children. Eye (London, England), 9 ( Pt, 136-41.
Mackie, R T ; McCulloch, D L ; Saunders, Kathryn ; Ballantyne, J ; Day, R E ; Bradnam, M S ; Dutton, G N. / Comparison of visual assessment tests in multiply handicapped children. In: Eye (London, England). 1995 ; Vol. 9 ( Pt. pp. 136-41.
@article{e8444d180a89498d8e069bf9be818c75,
title = "Comparison of visual assessment tests in multiply handicapped children.",
abstract = "The aims of this study were to compare acuity estimates achieved with visual evoked potential (VEP) and acuity card techniques and to examine the success rates of each test in a group of multiply handicapped children. Subjects were 52 children (3-183 months) with multiple handicaps associated with prematurity (n = 17), congenital anomalies (n = 16), hypoxic insult (n = 10) and other disorders (n = 9). Success rates for completing the tests were: VEP 88{\%} and acuity cards 85{\%} (Keeler or Cardiff). The acuity card tests were less likely to be successfully completed in the severely disabled (p <0.05) and in those children with nystagmus (p <0.05). When both acuity cards were successful, results agreed to within +/- 1.75 octaves. Acuity card thresholds were significantly correlated with VEP thresholds (p <0.02), but thresholds achieved with VEPs were better in children with poor vision.",
author = "Mackie, {R T} and McCulloch, {D L} and Kathryn Saunders and J Ballantyne and Day, {R E} and Bradnam, {M S} and Dutton, {G N}",
year = "1995",
language = "English",
volume = "9 ( Pt",
pages = "136--41",
journal = "EYE",
issn = "0950-222X",

}

Mackie, RT, McCulloch, DL, Saunders, K, Ballantyne, J, Day, RE, Bradnam, MS & Dutton, GN 1995, 'Comparison of visual assessment tests in multiply handicapped children.', Eye (London, England), vol. 9 ( Pt, pp. 136-41.

Comparison of visual assessment tests in multiply handicapped children. / Mackie, R T; McCulloch, D L; Saunders, Kathryn; Ballantyne, J; Day, R E; Bradnam, M S; Dutton, G N.

In: Eye (London, England), Vol. 9 ( Pt, 1995, p. 136-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of visual assessment tests in multiply handicapped children.

AU - Mackie, R T

AU - McCulloch, D L

AU - Saunders, Kathryn

AU - Ballantyne, J

AU - Day, R E

AU - Bradnam, M S

AU - Dutton, G N

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - The aims of this study were to compare acuity estimates achieved with visual evoked potential (VEP) and acuity card techniques and to examine the success rates of each test in a group of multiply handicapped children. Subjects were 52 children (3-183 months) with multiple handicaps associated with prematurity (n = 17), congenital anomalies (n = 16), hypoxic insult (n = 10) and other disorders (n = 9). Success rates for completing the tests were: VEP 88% and acuity cards 85% (Keeler or Cardiff). The acuity card tests were less likely to be successfully completed in the severely disabled (p <0.05) and in those children with nystagmus (p <0.05). When both acuity cards were successful, results agreed to within +/- 1.75 octaves. Acuity card thresholds were significantly correlated with VEP thresholds (p <0.02), but thresholds achieved with VEPs were better in children with poor vision.

AB - The aims of this study were to compare acuity estimates achieved with visual evoked potential (VEP) and acuity card techniques and to examine the success rates of each test in a group of multiply handicapped children. Subjects were 52 children (3-183 months) with multiple handicaps associated with prematurity (n = 17), congenital anomalies (n = 16), hypoxic insult (n = 10) and other disorders (n = 9). Success rates for completing the tests were: VEP 88% and acuity cards 85% (Keeler or Cardiff). The acuity card tests were less likely to be successfully completed in the severely disabled (p <0.05) and in those children with nystagmus (p <0.05). When both acuity cards were successful, results agreed to within +/- 1.75 octaves. Acuity card thresholds were significantly correlated with VEP thresholds (p <0.02), but thresholds achieved with VEPs were better in children with poor vision.

UR - http://www.nature.com/eye/index.html

M3 - Article

VL - 9 ( Pt

SP - 136

EP - 141

JO - EYE

T2 - EYE

JF - EYE

SN - 0950-222X

ER -

Mackie RT, McCulloch DL, Saunders K, Ballantyne J, Day RE, Bradnam MS et al. Comparison of visual assessment tests in multiply handicapped children. Eye (London, England). 1995;9 ( Pt:136-41.