Comparison between inverted absorber asymmetric and symmetric tubular-absorbercompound parabolic concentrating solar collectors

A. F. Kothdiwala; Philip Charles Eames; Brian Norton; Aggelos Zacharopoulos

doi:10.1016/S0960-1481(98)00786-1

Comparison between inverted absorber asymmetric and symmetric tubular-absorbercompound parabolic concentrating solar collectors

A. F. Kothdiwala, Philip Charles Eames, Brian Norton, Aggelos Zacharopoulos

Faculty Of Computing, Eng. & Built Env.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Hottel-Whiller-Bliss characteristics of particular comparable examples of asymmetric and symmetric compound parabolic concentrating solar energy collectors are presented. It is shown that over the relevant range of operating conditions at an optimum absorber configuration an asymmetric inverted flat absorber compound parabolic concentrating collector has a solar conversion efficiency 10%-15% greater than a comparable tubular absorber symmetric compound parabolic concentrating collector.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	277-281
Journal	Renewable Energy
Volume	18
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(98)00786-1
Publication status	Published (in print/issue) - Oct 1999

Access to Document

10.1016/S0960-1481(98)00786-1

Cite this

@article{8adfac49ee2849cab6a3a3e79d26537d,

title = "Comparison between inverted absorber asymmetric and symmetric tubular-absorbercompound parabolic concentrating solar collectors",

abstract = "The Hottel-Whiller-Bliss characteristics of particular comparable examples of asymmetric and symmetric compound parabolic concentrating solar energy collectors are presented. It is shown that over the relevant range of operating conditions at an optimum absorber configuration an asymmetric inverted flat absorber compound parabolic concentrating collector has a solar conversion efficiency 10%-15% greater than a comparable tubular absorber symmetric compound parabolic concentrating collector.",

author = "Kothdiwala, {A. F.} and Eames, {Philip Charles} and Brian Norton and Aggelos Zacharopoulos",

year = "1999",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1016/S0960-1481(98)00786-1",

language = "English",

volume = "18",

pages = "277--281",

journal = "Renewable Energy",

issn = "1879-0682",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison between inverted absorber asymmetric and symmetric tubular-absorbercompound parabolic concentrating solar collectors

AU - Kothdiwala, A. F.

AU - Eames, Philip Charles

AU - Norton, Brian

AU - Zacharopoulos, Aggelos

PY - 1999/10

Y1 - 1999/10

N2 - The Hottel-Whiller-Bliss characteristics of particular comparable examples of asymmetric and symmetric compound parabolic concentrating solar energy collectors are presented. It is shown that over the relevant range of operating conditions at an optimum absorber configuration an asymmetric inverted flat absorber compound parabolic concentrating collector has a solar conversion efficiency 10%-15% greater than a comparable tubular absorber symmetric compound parabolic concentrating collector.

AB - The Hottel-Whiller-Bliss characteristics of particular comparable examples of asymmetric and symmetric compound parabolic concentrating solar energy collectors are presented. It is shown that over the relevant range of operating conditions at an optimum absorber configuration an asymmetric inverted flat absorber compound parabolic concentrating collector has a solar conversion efficiency 10%-15% greater than a comparable tubular absorber symmetric compound parabolic concentrating collector.

U2 - 10.1016/S0960-1481(98)00786-1

DO - 10.1016/S0960-1481(98)00786-1

M3 - Article

SN - 1879-0682

VL - 18

SP - 277

EP - 281

JO - Renewable Energy

JF - Renewable Energy

ER -

Comparison between inverted absorber asymmetric and symmetric tubular-absorbercompound parabolic concentrating solar collectors

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this