Comparing long-term placements for young children in care: Does type of placement really matter?

Dominic Mc Sherry, Montserrat Fargas Malet, Kerrylee Weatherall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents findings from the third phase of a longitudinal study, entitled Care Pathways and Outcomes, which has been tracking the placements and measuring outcomes for a population of children (n = 374) who were under the age of five and in care in Northern Ireland on the 31st March 2000. It explores how a sub-sample of these children at age nine to 14 years old were getting on in the placements provided for them, in comparative terms across five placement types: adoption; foster care; kinship foster care (with relatives); on Residence Order; and living with birth parents. This specifically focused on the development of attachment and self-concept from the perspective of the children, and behavioural and emotional function, and parenting stress, from the perspective of parents and carers. Findings showed no significant placement effect from the perspective of children, and a statistically weak, but descriptively compelling, effect from the perspective of parents. The findings challenge the notion of adoption as the gold standard in long-term placements, specifically from the perspective of children in terms of their parent/carer attachments and self-concept, and highlight what appears to be the central importance of placement longevity for delivering positive longer-term outcomes for these children, irrespective of placement type.
LanguageEnglish
Pages56-66
Number of pages11
JournalChildren and Youth Services Review
Volume69
Early online date29 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2016

Fingerprint

parents
self-concept
gold standard
kinship
longitudinal study

Keywords

  • Foster care; adoption; rehabilitation; kinship foster care; longitudinal; outcomes

Cite this

Mc Sherry, Dominic ; Fargas Malet, Montserrat ; Weatherall, Kerrylee. / Comparing long-term placements for young children in care: Does type of placement really matter?. 2016 ; Vol. 69. pp. 56-66.
@article{23928e4e9bbd43d59ae2ea3bd296dc22,
title = "Comparing long-term placements for young children in care: Does type of placement really matter?",
abstract = "This paper presents findings from the third phase of a longitudinal study, entitled Care Pathways and Outcomes, which has been tracking the placements and measuring outcomes for a population of children (n = 374) who were under the age of five and in care in Northern Ireland on the 31st March 2000. It explores how a sub-sample of these children at age nine to 14 years old were getting on in the placements provided for them, in comparative terms across five placement types: adoption; foster care; kinship foster care (with relatives); on Residence Order; and living with birth parents. This specifically focused on the development of attachment and self-concept from the perspective of the children, and behavioural and emotional function, and parenting stress, from the perspective of parents and carers. Findings showed no significant placement effect from the perspective of children, and a statistically weak, but descriptively compelling, effect from the perspective of parents. The findings challenge the notion of adoption as the gold standard in long-term placements, specifically from the perspective of children in terms of their parent/carer attachments and self-concept, and highlight what appears to be the central importance of placement longevity for delivering positive longer-term outcomes for these children, irrespective of placement type.",
keywords = "Foster care; adoption; rehabilitation; kinship foster care; longitudinal; outcomes",
author = "{Mc Sherry}, Dominic and {Fargas Malet}, Montserrat and Kerrylee Weatherall",
note = "Dominic was employed at Queens but there is not an exception to state employed at another UK Institution",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.07.021",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "56--66",

}

Comparing long-term placements for young children in care: Does type of placement really matter? / Mc Sherry, Dominic; Fargas Malet, Montserrat; Weatherall, Kerrylee.

Vol. 69, 01.10.2016, p. 56-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing long-term placements for young children in care: Does type of placement really matter?

AU - Mc Sherry, Dominic

AU - Fargas Malet, Montserrat

AU - Weatherall, Kerrylee

N1 - Dominic was employed at Queens but there is not an exception to state employed at another UK Institution

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - This paper presents findings from the third phase of a longitudinal study, entitled Care Pathways and Outcomes, which has been tracking the placements and measuring outcomes for a population of children (n = 374) who were under the age of five and in care in Northern Ireland on the 31st March 2000. It explores how a sub-sample of these children at age nine to 14 years old were getting on in the placements provided for them, in comparative terms across five placement types: adoption; foster care; kinship foster care (with relatives); on Residence Order; and living with birth parents. This specifically focused on the development of attachment and self-concept from the perspective of the children, and behavioural and emotional function, and parenting stress, from the perspective of parents and carers. Findings showed no significant placement effect from the perspective of children, and a statistically weak, but descriptively compelling, effect from the perspective of parents. The findings challenge the notion of adoption as the gold standard in long-term placements, specifically from the perspective of children in terms of their parent/carer attachments and self-concept, and highlight what appears to be the central importance of placement longevity for delivering positive longer-term outcomes for these children, irrespective of placement type.

AB - This paper presents findings from the third phase of a longitudinal study, entitled Care Pathways and Outcomes, which has been tracking the placements and measuring outcomes for a population of children (n = 374) who were under the age of five and in care in Northern Ireland on the 31st March 2000. It explores how a sub-sample of these children at age nine to 14 years old were getting on in the placements provided for them, in comparative terms across five placement types: adoption; foster care; kinship foster care (with relatives); on Residence Order; and living with birth parents. This specifically focused on the development of attachment and self-concept from the perspective of the children, and behavioural and emotional function, and parenting stress, from the perspective of parents and carers. Findings showed no significant placement effect from the perspective of children, and a statistically weak, but descriptively compelling, effect from the perspective of parents. The findings challenge the notion of adoption as the gold standard in long-term placements, specifically from the perspective of children in terms of their parent/carer attachments and self-concept, and highlight what appears to be the central importance of placement longevity for delivering positive longer-term outcomes for these children, irrespective of placement type.

KW - Foster care; adoption; rehabilitation; kinship foster care; longitudinal; outcomes

U2 - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.07.021

DO - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.07.021

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 56

EP - 66

ER -