Comparative effectiveness of tirzepatide and semaglutide for obesity management in US clinical practice: a 6-month retrospective cohort study

  • Carel W. le Roux
  • , Nicolae Done
  • , Alan J. M. Brnabic
  • , Abigail Zion
  • , Ilya Lipkovich
  • , Zbigniew Kadziola
  • , Julia P. Dunn
  • , Urvi Desai
  • , Noam Kirson
  • , Georgios K. Dimitriadis
  • , Hong Kan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: The SURMOUNT-5 trial demonstrated greater weight reduction with tirzepatide vs. semaglutide in adults with obesity without diabetes. This study compared real-world weight reduction and cardiometabolic parameters associated with tirzepatide and semaglutide for obesity management. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Truveta de-identified US electronic health record data. Adults with obesity or overweight and ≥ 1 obesity-related complication, without diabetes, who initiated tirzepatide or semaglutide December 2023–June 2024 and adhered to treatment, were followed for 6 months. Primary outcome was percentage weight change from baseline. Secondary outcomes included weight-reduction targets and changes in body mass index (BMI) and cardiometabolic parameters. Primary analysis employed propensity-score weighted regression. Sensitivity analyses included modified intention-to-treat. Results: Among 2,396 on-treatment patients (1,003 tirzepatide; 1,393 semaglutide), greater 6-month mean percentage weight reduction was observed with tirzepatide (–11.15% vs. −8.83%; adjusted difference −2.32%-points [95% CI: −3.17, −1.48]). Higher proportions of tirzepatide-treated patients achieved 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% weight-reduction targets. Greater reductions in BMI, blood pressure, and haemoglobin A1c were observed with tirzepatide. More patients received higher doses of semaglutide (≥ 1.7 mg; 67.7%) vs. tirzepatide (≥ 10 mg; 42.4%). Sensitivity analysis findings were consistent. Conclusions: Consistent with clinical trials, real-world tirzepatide treatment was associated with greater 6-month weight reduction and more frequent achievement of weight-reduction targets and improvements in select cardiometabolic parameters than semaglutide among adults with obesity without diabetes. This early emergence of tirzepatide’s comparative advantage over semaglutide was observed despite more semaglutide-treated patients receiving higher doses than tirzepatide-treated patients.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)413-423
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Endocrinological Investigation
Volume49
Issue number2
Early online date9 Feb 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 28 Feb 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026.

Data Access Statement

The data that support the findings of this study were licensed from Truveta. Per the Data Use Agreement between Lilly and Truveta, the deposition of data into publicly available repositories is not allowed

Funding

Eli Lilly and Company.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Comparative effectiveness
  • Tirzepatide
  • Semaglutide
  • Real-world evidence
  • Obesity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative effectiveness of tirzepatide and semaglutide for obesity management in US clinical practice: a 6-month retrospective cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this