Abstract
Background: Multi-professional approach to child protection decision making is widely promoted by service organisations, although the conditions for this to be effective are little known.
Objective: This systematic narrative literature review explored empirical evidence on the implementation of multi-professional child protection decision making in community settings. Of particular interest were the contextual conditions upon which joint working is build (inputs), aspects of interactional functioning (mediators), and the results of working together (outputs).
Participants and setting: Five electronic bibliographic databases were selected for the search. The review was restricted to articles published in peer-reviewed journals, in the English language for ten years, from 1st January 2010 to 31st December 2019. Of the 6,934 studies retrieved, 30 studies undertaken in six countries were included.
Methods: The systematic approach to literature reviewing utilised was ‘Systematic Narrative Review’. This approach starts with clearly formulated questions, employs systematic, explicit, and replicable processes for searching the literature to retrieve research, retains quality appraisal limited to publications in peer-reviewed journals, and uses a narrative synthesis.
Results: The analysis outlined key building blocks that form the structure for collaborative decision making and identified cognitive, relational, and behavioural interactional properties that occur when making decisions together. Limitations of the published literature hinder the ability of making robust inferences about outcomes of collaborative decision-making practice.
Conclusion: The article discusses the next steps for research and implications for policy and practice for promoting useful multi-professional working in child protection decision making in the community.
Objective: This systematic narrative literature review explored empirical evidence on the implementation of multi-professional child protection decision making in community settings. Of particular interest were the contextual conditions upon which joint working is build (inputs), aspects of interactional functioning (mediators), and the results of working together (outputs).
Participants and setting: Five electronic bibliographic databases were selected for the search. The review was restricted to articles published in peer-reviewed journals, in the English language for ten years, from 1st January 2010 to 31st December 2019. Of the 6,934 studies retrieved, 30 studies undertaken in six countries were included.
Methods: The systematic approach to literature reviewing utilised was ‘Systematic Narrative Review’. This approach starts with clearly formulated questions, employs systematic, explicit, and replicable processes for searching the literature to retrieve research, retains quality appraisal limited to publications in peer-reviewed journals, and uses a narrative synthesis.
Results: The analysis outlined key building blocks that form the structure for collaborative decision making and identified cognitive, relational, and behavioural interactional properties that occur when making decisions together. Limitations of the published literature hinder the ability of making robust inferences about outcomes of collaborative decision-making practice.
Conclusion: The article discusses the next steps for research and implications for policy and practice for promoting useful multi-professional working in child protection decision making in the community.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 105432 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-17 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Child Abuse and Neglect |
Volume | 123 |
Early online date | 15 Dec 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 31 Jan 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The authors gratefully acknowledge Amy Lauren Shapira of the reference department at the Younes and Soraya Nazarian Library at University of Haifa, for her advice and assistance with formulating the database search strategies. The research was not funded by any institution or organisation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
Keywords
- child abuse
- child protection
- child safeguarding
- decision making
- multi-professional working
- community
- inter-disciplinary
- risk
- assessment
- Review Article
- Child protection
- Decision making
- Inter-disciplinary
- Child abuse
- Multi-professional
- Community