Communications between staff and adult persons with intellectual disabilities in naturally occurring settings.

Roy McConkey, Irene Morris, Margaret Purcell,

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Videotapes were made of 43 staff-client dyads in small-scale residential and day service settings. Frequency counts were made of carers’ communicative acts, and two experienced speech and language therapists rated these for appropriateness. Recommendations for enhancing communication were also noted. The results showed that clients were presented with few opportunities to engage as equal partners in the conversational interchanges: staff overly relied on verbal acts, even when they were communicating with predominantly non-verbal clients; they tended to favour the use of directives and questions, and the majority of staff failed to adjust their language to the client’s level of understanding. The most commonly recommended changes for staff were to use simpler sentences and words, to increase their use of non-verbal signals and open questions, to provide more opportunities for clients to initiate topics, and to increase their responsiveness to client’s non-verbal signals. The explanations for staff behaviour are reviewed and the implications for changing practice are discussed.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages194-205
    JournalJournal of Intellectual Disability Research
    Volume43
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 1999

    Fingerprint

    communications
    disability
    staff
    human being
    language
    dyad
    therapist
    communication

    Cite this

    @article{9bc4ac58505b430a8256ec2734bd1159,
    title = "Communications between staff and adult persons with intellectual disabilities in naturally occurring settings.",
    abstract = "Videotapes were made of 43 staff-client dyads in small-scale residential and day service settings. Frequency counts were made of carers’ communicative acts, and two experienced speech and language therapists rated these for appropriateness. Recommendations for enhancing communication were also noted. The results showed that clients were presented with few opportunities to engage as equal partners in the conversational interchanges: staff overly relied on verbal acts, even when they were communicating with predominantly non-verbal clients; they tended to favour the use of directives and questions, and the majority of staff failed to adjust their language to the client’s level of understanding. The most commonly recommended changes for staff were to use simpler sentences and words, to increase their use of non-verbal signals and open questions, to provide more opportunities for clients to initiate topics, and to increase their responsiveness to client’s non-verbal signals. The explanations for staff behaviour are reviewed and the implications for changing practice are discussed.",
    author = "Roy McConkey and Irene Morris and Margaret Purcell,",
    year = "1999",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    language = "English",
    volume = "43",
    pages = "194--205",
    journal = "Journal of Intellectual Disability Research",
    issn = "0964-2633",
    number = "3",

    }

    Communications between staff and adult persons with intellectual disabilities in naturally occurring settings. / McConkey, Roy; Morris, Irene; Purcell, Margaret.

    In: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Vol. 43, No. 3, 01.07.1999, p. 194-205.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Communications between staff and adult persons with intellectual disabilities in naturally occurring settings.

    AU - McConkey, Roy

    AU - Morris, Irene

    AU - Purcell,, Margaret

    PY - 1999/7/1

    Y1 - 1999/7/1

    N2 - Videotapes were made of 43 staff-client dyads in small-scale residential and day service settings. Frequency counts were made of carers’ communicative acts, and two experienced speech and language therapists rated these for appropriateness. Recommendations for enhancing communication were also noted. The results showed that clients were presented with few opportunities to engage as equal partners in the conversational interchanges: staff overly relied on verbal acts, even when they were communicating with predominantly non-verbal clients; they tended to favour the use of directives and questions, and the majority of staff failed to adjust their language to the client’s level of understanding. The most commonly recommended changes for staff were to use simpler sentences and words, to increase their use of non-verbal signals and open questions, to provide more opportunities for clients to initiate topics, and to increase their responsiveness to client’s non-verbal signals. The explanations for staff behaviour are reviewed and the implications for changing practice are discussed.

    AB - Videotapes were made of 43 staff-client dyads in small-scale residential and day service settings. Frequency counts were made of carers’ communicative acts, and two experienced speech and language therapists rated these for appropriateness. Recommendations for enhancing communication were also noted. The results showed that clients were presented with few opportunities to engage as equal partners in the conversational interchanges: staff overly relied on verbal acts, even when they were communicating with predominantly non-verbal clients; they tended to favour the use of directives and questions, and the majority of staff failed to adjust their language to the client’s level of understanding. The most commonly recommended changes for staff were to use simpler sentences and words, to increase their use of non-verbal signals and open questions, to provide more opportunities for clients to initiate topics, and to increase their responsiveness to client’s non-verbal signals. The explanations for staff behaviour are reviewed and the implications for changing practice are discussed.

    M3 - Article

    VL - 43

    SP - 194

    EP - 205

    JO - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

    T2 - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

    JF - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

    SN - 0964-2633

    IS - 3

    ER -