Communication skills training: management manipulation or personal development?

Owen Hargie, Dennis Tourish

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In a recent edition of Human Relations, Elmes and Costello (1992) reported the results of their observations of a communication skills training (CST) workshop. Their paper examined this approach to training from a dramaturgical perspective and argued that CST could be considered as an inherently manipulative means of strengthening management control within organizations. Given that there has been an explosive growth of interest in CST as a means of furthering personal development, in a variety of professional contexts, the present paper addresses the concerns raised by Elmes and Costello, by examining some of the central issues associated with this approach to training. Research evidence is reviewed which suggests that CST is an effective training medium which can be a positive force for strengthening relationships within the work environment. CST as a means of furthering behavioral change is examine in the light of the Elmes and Costello critique. Finally, the implications of these issues for the management of relationships at work are considered.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages1377-1389
    JournalHuman Relations
    Volume47
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1994

    Fingerprint

    communication skills
    manipulation
    Communication
    management
    human relations
    Communication skills
    Manipulation
    Training management
    Skills training
    Communication Skills
    Personal Development
    Management Training
    work environment
    edition
    evidence

    Cite this

    Hargie, Owen ; Tourish, Dennis. / Communication skills training: management manipulation or personal development?. In: Human Relations. 1994 ; Vol. 47, No. 11. pp. 1377-1389.
    @article{2f1fa326e991408f90bc5673c83d29c7,
    title = "Communication skills training: management manipulation or personal development?",
    abstract = "In a recent edition of Human Relations, Elmes and Costello (1992) reported the results of their observations of a communication skills training (CST) workshop. Their paper examined this approach to training from a dramaturgical perspective and argued that CST could be considered as an inherently manipulative means of strengthening management control within organizations. Given that there has been an explosive growth of interest in CST as a means of furthering personal development, in a variety of professional contexts, the present paper addresses the concerns raised by Elmes and Costello, by examining some of the central issues associated with this approach to training. Research evidence is reviewed which suggests that CST is an effective training medium which can be a positive force for strengthening relationships within the work environment. CST as a means of furthering behavioral change is examine in the light of the Elmes and Costello critique. Finally, the implications of these issues for the management of relationships at work are considered.",
    author = "Owen Hargie and Dennis Tourish",
    year = "1994",
    doi = "10.1177/001872679404701104",
    language = "English",
    volume = "47",
    pages = "1377--1389",
    journal = "Human Relations",
    issn = "0018-7267",
    number = "11",

    }

    Communication skills training: management manipulation or personal development? / Hargie, Owen; Tourish, Dennis.

    In: Human Relations, Vol. 47, No. 11, 1994, p. 1377-1389.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Communication skills training: management manipulation or personal development?

    AU - Hargie, Owen

    AU - Tourish, Dennis

    PY - 1994

    Y1 - 1994

    N2 - In a recent edition of Human Relations, Elmes and Costello (1992) reported the results of their observations of a communication skills training (CST) workshop. Their paper examined this approach to training from a dramaturgical perspective and argued that CST could be considered as an inherently manipulative means of strengthening management control within organizations. Given that there has been an explosive growth of interest in CST as a means of furthering personal development, in a variety of professional contexts, the present paper addresses the concerns raised by Elmes and Costello, by examining some of the central issues associated with this approach to training. Research evidence is reviewed which suggests that CST is an effective training medium which can be a positive force for strengthening relationships within the work environment. CST as a means of furthering behavioral change is examine in the light of the Elmes and Costello critique. Finally, the implications of these issues for the management of relationships at work are considered.

    AB - In a recent edition of Human Relations, Elmes and Costello (1992) reported the results of their observations of a communication skills training (CST) workshop. Their paper examined this approach to training from a dramaturgical perspective and argued that CST could be considered as an inherently manipulative means of strengthening management control within organizations. Given that there has been an explosive growth of interest in CST as a means of furthering personal development, in a variety of professional contexts, the present paper addresses the concerns raised by Elmes and Costello, by examining some of the central issues associated with this approach to training. Research evidence is reviewed which suggests that CST is an effective training medium which can be a positive force for strengthening relationships within the work environment. CST as a means of furthering behavioral change is examine in the light of the Elmes and Costello critique. Finally, the implications of these issues for the management of relationships at work are considered.

    U2 - 10.1177/001872679404701104

    DO - 10.1177/001872679404701104

    M3 - Article

    VL - 47

    SP - 1377

    EP - 1389

    JO - Human Relations

    T2 - Human Relations

    JF - Human Relations

    SN - 0018-7267

    IS - 11

    ER -