Communicating sensitive business issues: Part 2

David Dickson, Seanenne Rainey, Owen Hargie

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This is the second of a two-part article reporting the results of a study which investigated communication and relationships in the workplaces of four large organizations in Northern Ireland, two in the public sector and two in the private. A central purpose of the research was to evaluate suitable methods for auditing relationships among staff. Based on a review of the apposite literature on organizational and relational communication, the most promising techniques finally selected were the focus group approach, retrospective interview technique, social network analysis, and critical incident technique. In Part 1 the first two of these techniques were evaluated. Now, in Part 2 social network analysis and critical incident technique are similarly examined, in terms of their potential to generate quality data on the types of association that typify those who share a work environment. In a final conclusion to the two-part article, recommendations for using qualitative and quantitative methods for auditing internal relationships are also offered.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages121-127
    JournalCorporate Communications: An International Journal
    Volume8
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Fingerprint

    Critical incident technique
    Communication
    Social network analysis
    Public sector
    Quantitative methods
    Northern Ireland
    Auditing
    Work place
    Staff
    Focus groups
    Qualitative methods
    Data quality
    Internal auditing
    Work environment

    Cite this

    Dickson, D., Rainey, S., & Hargie, O. (2003). Communicating sensitive business issues: Part 2. 8(2), 121-127. https://doi.org/10.1108/1356328031047562
    Dickson, David ; Rainey, Seanenne ; Hargie, Owen. / Communicating sensitive business issues: Part 2. 2003 ; Vol. 8, No. 2. pp. 121-127.
    @article{7e4694b8fc804927b895dd6c50d30118,
    title = "Communicating sensitive business issues: Part 2",
    abstract = "This is the second of a two-part article reporting the results of a study which investigated communication and relationships in the workplaces of four large organizations in Northern Ireland, two in the public sector and two in the private. A central purpose of the research was to evaluate suitable methods for auditing relationships among staff. Based on a review of the apposite literature on organizational and relational communication, the most promising techniques finally selected were the focus group approach, retrospective interview technique, social network analysis, and critical incident technique. In Part 1 the first two of these techniques were evaluated. Now, in Part 2 social network analysis and critical incident technique are similarly examined, in terms of their potential to generate quality data on the types of association that typify those who share a work environment. In a final conclusion to the two-part article, recommendations for using qualitative and quantitative methods for auditing internal relationships are also offered.",
    author = "David Dickson and Seanenne Rainey and Owen Hargie",
    year = "2003",
    doi = "10.1108/1356328031047562",
    language = "English",
    volume = "8",
    pages = "121--127",
    number = "2",

    }

    Dickson, D, Rainey, S & Hargie, O 2003, 'Communicating sensitive business issues: Part 2', vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 121-127. https://doi.org/10.1108/1356328031047562

    Communicating sensitive business issues: Part 2. / Dickson, David; Rainey, Seanenne; Hargie, Owen.

    Vol. 8, No. 2, 2003, p. 121-127.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Communicating sensitive business issues: Part 2

    AU - Dickson, David

    AU - Rainey, Seanenne

    AU - Hargie, Owen

    PY - 2003

    Y1 - 2003

    N2 - This is the second of a two-part article reporting the results of a study which investigated communication and relationships in the workplaces of four large organizations in Northern Ireland, two in the public sector and two in the private. A central purpose of the research was to evaluate suitable methods for auditing relationships among staff. Based on a review of the apposite literature on organizational and relational communication, the most promising techniques finally selected were the focus group approach, retrospective interview technique, social network analysis, and critical incident technique. In Part 1 the first two of these techniques were evaluated. Now, in Part 2 social network analysis and critical incident technique are similarly examined, in terms of their potential to generate quality data on the types of association that typify those who share a work environment. In a final conclusion to the two-part article, recommendations for using qualitative and quantitative methods for auditing internal relationships are also offered.

    AB - This is the second of a two-part article reporting the results of a study which investigated communication and relationships in the workplaces of four large organizations in Northern Ireland, two in the public sector and two in the private. A central purpose of the research was to evaluate suitable methods for auditing relationships among staff. Based on a review of the apposite literature on organizational and relational communication, the most promising techniques finally selected were the focus group approach, retrospective interview technique, social network analysis, and critical incident technique. In Part 1 the first two of these techniques were evaluated. Now, in Part 2 social network analysis and critical incident technique are similarly examined, in terms of their potential to generate quality data on the types of association that typify those who share a work environment. In a final conclusion to the two-part article, recommendations for using qualitative and quantitative methods for auditing internal relationships are also offered.

    U2 - 10.1108/1356328031047562

    DO - 10.1108/1356328031047562

    M3 - Article

    VL - 8

    SP - 121

    EP - 127

    IS - 2

    ER -